Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Land Dispute Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute and Lack of Criminal Intent. Dispute over right of way through agricultural land does not constitute offences under Sections 294, 504, 506 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicants, original accused persons, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of FIR No. 51 of 2018 registered at Latur (Rural) Police Station for offences under Sections 294, 504, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), and the consequent charge-sheet pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Latur. The informant, respondent No.2, alleged that on 13-05-2018 at about 6:30 a.m., she was in front of her house when her distant relatives were passing through her agricultural land. She objected to their use of her land as a pathway. At that time, the applicants arrived and allegedly abused her. The court examined the FIR and charge-sheet and found that the dispute was essentially about a right of way over agricultural land, which is a civil matter. The allegations of abusive language did not satisfy the ingredients of the offences under Sections 294, 504, and 506 IPC, as there was no evidence of public nuisance, intentional insult to provoke breach of peace, or criminal intimidation. The court held that continuing criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law. Accordingly, the court allowed the application and quashed the FIR and charge-sheet.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Abuse of Process - Dispute pertained to right of way over agricultural land - Court held that the allegations were essentially civil in nature and lacked ingredients of criminal offences - Held that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and charge-sheet for offences under Sections 294, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC should be quashed as the dispute is civil in nature and lacks criminal intent.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Application allowed. FIR No. 51 of 2018 registered with Latur (Rural) Police Station and charge-sheet No. 05 of 2018 pending before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Latur, are quashed.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC
  • Civil dispute not to be given criminal colour
  • Abuse of process of law
  • Ingredients of Sections 294
  • 504
  • 506 IPC not made out
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (10) 38

Criminal Application No. 2303 of 2018

2018-10-19

T. V. Nalawade, Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi

Mr. P. D. Jarare for applicants, Ms. D. S. Jape for respondent No.1/State, Mr. S. P. Katneshwarkar for respondent No.2

Dnyanoba s/o Nivrutti Thormote and Archana alias Munna w/o Dnyanoba Thormote

The State of Maharashtra and Venutai w/o Dnyanoba Mare

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR and charge-sheet.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No. 51 of 2018 and charge-sheet No. 05 of 2018 pending before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Latur.

Filing Reason

Allegations of abuse and criminal intimidation arising from a land dispute over right of way.

Issues

Whether the FIR and charge-sheet disclose ingredients of offences under Sections 294, 504, 506 IPC. Whether the dispute is essentially civil in nature and criminal proceedings are an abuse of process.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicants argued that the dispute is civil in nature regarding right of way and no criminal offence is made out. Respondent No.2 argued that the applicants abused her and committed offences.

Ratio Decidendi

When the allegations in FIR and charge-sheet do not make out ingredients of criminal offences and the dispute is essentially civil in nature, continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law, warranting quashing under Section 482 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The dispute is essentially civil in nature and the criminal machinery has been set in motion only to wreak vengeance. The ingredients of the offences under Sections 294, 504, 506 IPC are not made out.

Procedural History

FIR No. 51 of 2018 was registered on 13-05-2018 at Latur (Rural) Police Station. Charge-sheet No. 05 of 2018 was filed before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Latur. Applicants filed Criminal Application No. 2303 of 2018 under Section 482 CrPC for quashing. The High Court heard and allowed the application on 19-10-2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 294, 504, 506, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Land Dispute Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute and Lack of Criminal Intent. Dispute over right of way through agricultural land does not constitute offences under Sections 294, 504, 506 IPC.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Drivers' Petition for Time Bound Promotion Scheme Benefits. Government Resolution dated 17.5.2003 Quashed as Discriminatory Against Drivers in Zilla Parishads.