Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case Against Applicants. Court holds that mere issuance of cheque without existing debt or liability does not attract offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicants, Sanjay Hapgunde and Pradip Kalyane, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 01974 of 2018 registered at Nanded police station for offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The FIR was lodged by respondent no.2, Sunita Gulzarwad, alleging that a cheque issued by the applicants was dishonoured. The applicants contended that there was no existing debt or liability and that the cheque was given as a security for a loan that was already repaid. The State of Maharashtra and the complainant were respondents. The High Court, after hearing arguments, granted leave to amend the application to include quashing of proceedings before the trial court. The Court examined the complaint and found that the complainant did not provide any evidence of a legally enforceable debt. The Court held that the essential ingredients of Section 138 were not satisfied, as the cheque was not issued in discharge of any debt or liability. Consequently, the Court quashed the FIR and all proceedings arising therefrom. The judgment was delivered by a Division Bench comprising T.V. Nalawade and Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, JJ., with the opinion authored by Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Negotiable Instruments Act - Dishonour of Cheque - Section 138 - Quashing of FIR - The applicants sought quashing of FIR alleging cheque dishonour, contending that the cheque was not issued for any existing debt or liability - The Court examined the complaint and found that the complainant failed to show any legally enforceable debt - Held that mere issuance of cheque without proof of debt does not constitute offence under Section 138 (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, can be quashed when there is no prima facie evidence of a legally enforceable debt or liability.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the application, quashed the FIR and all proceedings arising therefrom.

Law Points

  • Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act
  • 1881
  • presumption under Section 139
  • existence of legally enforceable debt
  • quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC
  • inherent powers of High Court
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (09) 10

Criminal Application No. 01974 of 2018

2018-09-19

T.V. Nalawade, Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi

Mr. N.S. Ghanekar, Ms. D.S. Jape, Mr. Yogesh D. Kale

Sanjay s/o. Kishanrao Hapgunde and Pradip s/o. Mallikarjun Kalyane

The State of Maharashtra and Sunita w/o. Gangadhar Gulzarwad

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR and proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No. 01974 of 2018 and all proceedings before the trial court.

Filing Reason

The applicants alleged that the cheque was not issued for any existing debt or liability and that the complaint was false.

Issues

Whether the FIR and proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, should be quashed for lack of prima facie case.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicants argued that the cheque was not issued for any legally enforceable debt or liability. Respondent/complainant contended that the cheque was dishonoured and offence under Section 138 is made out.

Ratio Decidendi

For an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the cheque must be issued in discharge of a legally enforceable debt or liability. Mere issuance of cheque without proof of such debt does not constitute the offence.

Judgment Excerpts

At the outset, learned Advocate for the applicants, seeks leave to amend the application so as to add the relief of quashing the proceedings initiated pursuant to the FIR, in question, before the trial court. Leave granted. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

Procedural History

The applicants filed Criminal Application No. 01974 of 2018 under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR. The Court granted leave to amend to include quashing of trial court proceedings. After hearing, the Court quashed the FIR and proceedings.

Acts & Sections

  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case Against Applicants. Court holds that mere issuance of cheque without existing debt or liability does not attract offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Refuses to Cancel NEET (UG) 2024 Examination Despite Alleged Paper Leak. Court Holds No Systemic Breach and Orders Segregation of Tainted Students.