Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Auction Sale of Guarantor's Property Without Notice Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. Court holds that sale of property belonging to a guarantor without notice under Section 101 and Rule 107 is void and liable to be set aside.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Amit P. Modi, filed a writ petition challenging the auction sale of his property by the respondent no.5 society, for which he was a guarantor. The respondent no.2, Pradeep Subhashchandra Kothawade, was the auction purchaser. The petitioner contended that no notice under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 and Rule 107 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961 was served upon him before the sale. The respondents argued that the sale was valid and the sale certificate was conclusive under Section 104 of the Act. The court examined the provisions and found that the sale was conducted without any notice to the petitioner, which is a mandatory requirement. The court held that the sale is void and not binding on the petitioner. The court set aside the sale certificate and directed the respondents to refund the auction amount to the respondent no.2 with interest. The writ petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Societies - Auction Sale - Notice to Guarantor - Section 101 Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, Rule 107 Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961 - Sale of guarantor's property without any notice under Section 101 and Rule 107 is void and not binding on the guarantor - The court held that the sale conducted without notice is illegal and set aside the sale certificate and possession (Paras 1-20).

B) Cooperative Societies - Sale Certificate - Conclusiveness - Section 104 Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Sale certificate is not conclusive if the sale itself is void for want of notice - The court held that the bar under Section 104 does not apply when the sale is void ab initio (Paras 15-20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the auction sale of the petitioner's property, who was a guarantor, without issuing any notice under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 and Rule 107 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961 is valid and binding on the petitioner.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the auction sale and sale certificate, and directed the respondents to refund the auction amount to respondent no.2 with interest at 9% per annum from the date of deposit till repayment.

Law Points

  • Auction sale without notice to guarantor is void
  • Section 101 Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act
  • Rule 107 Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules
  • Guarantor's right to notice
  • Sale certificate not conclusive if sale is void
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (08) 76

WRIT PETITION NO.11062 OF 2014

2018-08-07

R.D. Dhanuka

Mr.R.D. Soni with Mr.V.R. Kasle i/b Ram & Co. for the Petitioner, Mr.P.N. Joshi for the Respondent No.2, Mr.S.D. Rayrikar, A.G.P. for the State – Respondent Nos.3 and 4, Mr.R.S. Apte, Senior Counsel I/b Mr.Siddharth Wakankar for the Respondent Nos.5 and 6

Amit P. Modi

The State of Maharashtra, Pradeep Subhashchandra Kothawade, The Divisional Joint Registrar Cooperative Societies, The Assistant Registrar Cooperative Societies, Shri Ramchandra Vinayak Kothawade Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakari Patsanstha Marya, The Special Recovery Officer

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging auction sale of guarantor's property without notice

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to set aside the auction sale of his property and the sale certificate

Filing Reason

The petitioner's property was auctioned without any notice to him as guarantor

Issues

Whether the auction sale of the petitioner's property without notice under Section 101 and Rule 107 is valid? Whether the sale certificate is conclusive under Section 104 despite lack of notice?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that no notice under Section 101 and Rule 107 was served upon him before the sale, making the sale void. Respondents argued that the sale was valid and the sale certificate is conclusive under Section 104.

Ratio Decidendi

A sale of a guarantor's property under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act without notice under Section 101 and Rule 107 is void ab initio and not binding on the guarantor. The conclusiveness of the sale certificate under Section 104 does not apply to a void sale.

Judgment Excerpts

The sale of the property belonging to the petitioner who was a guarantor without any notice under Section 101 of the Act and Rule 107 of the Rules is void and not binding on the petitioner. The bar under Section 104 of the Act would not apply to a sale which is void ab initio.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed in 2014. On 21st July 2014, the court put parties to notice that the petition may be heard finally at admission stage. The court heard all parties and disposed of the petition on 7th August 2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960: 101, 104
  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961: 107
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Auction Sale of Guarantor's Property Without Notice Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. Court holds that sale of property belonging to a guarantor without notice under Section 101 and Rule 1...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Entry Ban Against Social Activist in Goa — Violation of Fundamental Rights Under Article 19(1)(d) and (e) of Constitution. Ban Order Passed Without Providing Opportunity of Hearing and Without Recording Subjective Satisfac...