Bombay High Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation for Minor Claimant with Permanent Disability in Motor Accident Case — Multiplier Method Applied for Future Loss of Earning Capacity. Notional Income of Rs.15,000 Per Annum Used for 7-Year-Old Child Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a claim for enhancement of compensation by a 7-year-old girl, Sayyad Alisha Rajjak, who suffered severe injuries in a road accident on 12 February 2013 when a tanker driven by respondent No.1 gave her a forceful dash. She was initially treated at Pandit Hospital, Ahmednagar for 4 days where she underwent 3 operations, and later at Noble Hospital from 15 February to 26 February 2013. She suffered a crush injury leading to 35% permanent disability. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Beed, awarded Rs.6,00,000/- as compensation. The claimant appealed seeking enhancement to Rs.27,70,000/- but restricted the claim to Rs.10,00,000/- for court fee purposes. The legal issues centered on the proper method for computing compensation for a child with permanent disability, particularly future loss of earning capacity. The appellant argued that the Tribunal erred in not applying the multiplier method and in awarding inadequate amounts for pain and suffering and medical expenses. The respondents contended that the award was just. The court analyzed the principles for assessing compensation for children with disabilities, noting that the multiplier method should be applied for future loss of earning capacity. It took the notional income of Rs.15,000/- per annum as per the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, applied a multiplier of 15 (appropriate for the child's age), and calculated future loss of earning capacity as Rs.78,750/- (15,000 x 15 x 35/100). The court also awarded Rs.1,00,000/- for pain and suffering, Rs.50,000/- for medical expenses, and Rs.50,000/- for future medical expenses, totaling Rs.2,78,750/-. However, considering the overall circumstances and the restricted claim, the court enhanced the compensation to Rs.10,00,000/-. The appeal was partly allowed, and the respondent insurance company was directed to pay the enhanced amount with interest at 9% per annum from the date of the claim petition.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Compensation - Permanent Disability to Child - Assessment of Compensation - The court considered the case of a 7-year-old girl who suffered 35% permanent disability due to a road accident. The Tribunal awarded Rs.6,00,000/-. The High Court enhanced the compensation to Rs.10,00,000/- by applying the multiplier method for future loss of earning capacity, taking notional income as per the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and adding amounts for pain and suffering, medical expenses, and future medical expenses. (Paras 1-10)

B) Motor Accident Compensation - Future Loss of Earning Capacity - Multiplier Method - For a child with permanent disability, the court held that the multiplier method should be applied to compute future loss of earning capacity, using the notional income of Rs.15,000/- per annum as per the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the appropriate multiplier of 15 for the age of the child. (Paras 5-8)

C) Motor Accident Compensation - Pain and Suffering - Medical Expenses - The court awarded Rs.1,00,000/- for pain and suffering and Rs.50,000/- for medical expenses, considering the nature of injuries and the treatment undergone. (Para 9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal for a 7-year-old girl with 35% permanent disability is just and proper, and whether the claimant is entitled to enhancement.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is partly allowed. The compensation is enhanced from Rs.6,00,000 to Rs.10,00,000. The respondent No.2 insurance company is directed to pay the enhanced amount with interest at 9% per annum from the date of the claim petition.

Law Points

  • Compensation for permanent disability to a child
  • Future loss of earning capacity
  • Multiplier method
  • Notional income for non-earning child
  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (08) 57

First Appeal No. 41 of 2017

2018-08-16

A.M. Dhavale, J.

Shri. Sushant B. Choudhari for Appellant, Shri. G.R. Sayed for Respondent No. 1, Shri. S.G. Chapalgaonkar for Respondent No. 2

Sayyad Alisha Rajjak (minor, through guardian father Sayyad Rajjak Sayyad Mohammad)

Altaf Noormohamad Tamboli and The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal for enhancement of compensation in a motor accident claim

Remedy Sought

Enhancement of compensation from Rs.6,00,000 to Rs.10,00,000 (restricted for court fee)

Filing Reason

Claimant dissatisfied with the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Beed awarded Rs.6,00,000 on 1st October 2016 in MACP No.273/13

Issues

Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just and proper? Whether the claimant is entitled to enhancement of compensation?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the Tribunal erred in not applying the multiplier method for future loss of earning capacity and awarded inadequate amounts for pain and suffering and medical expenses. Respondents contended that the award was just and proper and no enhancement was warranted.

Ratio Decidendi

For a child with permanent disability, the multiplier method should be applied to compute future loss of earning capacity, using the notional income as per the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the appropriate multiplier for the child's age. Additionally, separate amounts should be awarded for pain and suffering, medical expenses, and future medical expenses.

Judgment Excerpts

This is claimants appeal for enhancement of compensation awarded in the accident claim. The claimant by the Appeal seeks enhancement to the tune of Rs.27,70,000/- restricted to Rs.10,00,000/- for the purpose of court-fee. The court held that the multiplier method should be applied for future loss of earning capacity.

Procedural History

The claim petition was filed before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Beed, which awarded Rs.6,00,000 on 1st October 2016. The claimant filed the present appeal before the High Court for enhancement.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Second Schedule
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation for Minor Claimant with Permanent Disability in Motor Accident Case — Multiplier Method Applied for Future Loss of Earning Capacity. Notional Income of Rs.15,000 Per Annum Used for 7-Year-Old Chi...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Prosecution Case. Alleged Stabbing Incident Lacks Credible Witnesses and Medical Evidence, Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sect...