Bombay High Court Quashes Order De-registering Co-operative Society; Unauthorised Construction by Members Not a Ground for Cancellation Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Court Holds that Municipal Corporation Has Statutory Powers to Address Construction Violations Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, and Society Registration Cannot Be Thwarted on That Basis.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, a co-operative housing society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, challenged an order passed by the Secretary, Co-operation and Textiles Department, Government of Maharashtra, which allowed a revision application filed by the respondent developer and directed de-registration of the society. The society was formed by flat purchasers from the developer who had constructed the building. The Deputy Registrar granted registration on 21st January 1999. Prior to that, the Divisional Joint Registrar, by order dated 10th November 1998, had rejected the developer's complaint alleging unauthorised constructions by some flat purchasers. The developer filed a revision under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. On 20th May 1999, the revisional authority set aside the earlier order and directed de-registration on the ground that the society's formation would amount to sanctioning illegal constructions. The society filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution. The core legal issue was whether the registration of a co-operative society could be cancelled solely because some of its members had carried out unauthorised construction in their flats. The petitioner argued that such unauthorised works could not be a valid ground for cancellation and relied on the case of Sukhsagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra. The respondents, including the developer and the Municipal Corporation, supported the revisional order. The High Court held that the registration of a society under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 cannot be set aside on the ground of unauthorised construction by a few members. The court relied on the Sukhsagar case, which established that registration does not impinge upon the Municipal Corporation's statutory powers to grant occupation certificates or take action against illegal constructions. The court found the impugned order to be perverse and contrary to law. Accordingly, the writ petition was allowed, the order dated 20th May 1999 was quashed, and the revision application filed by the developer was dismissed. No costs were awarded.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Law - Registration of Society - Cancellation of Registration - Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, Section 154 - Ground for cancellation must be valid; unauthorised construction works by members cannot be considered for refusing or cancelling registration - Held that the order setting aside registration was perverse and contrary to law; Municipal Corporation empowered to take action against unauthorised construction under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (Paras 6, 10-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the registration of a co-operative society under the provisions of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 could be set aside on the ground of alleged unauthorised construction works carried out by flat purchasers in the building

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Impugned order dated 20th May 1999 quashed and set aside; revision application filed by developer dismissed; rule made absolute with no costs

Law Points

  • Registration of co-operative society cannot be cancelled on ground of unauthorised constructions by members
  • such infractions to be handled by Municipal Corporation under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act
  • 1888
  • registration does not affect powers to grant occupation certificate
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (07) 57

WRIT PETITION NO.3512 OF 1999

2018-07-20

R.D. Dhanuka

Mr. Javed Hussain, Mr. U.A. Madane, Mr. Pradip Patil

Shiv Co-op. Housing Soc. Ltd.

Haresh Desai, Partner of Bhavna Corporation & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 227 challenging order of revisional authority cancelling registration of co-operative housing society

Remedy Sought

Petitioner society sought quashing of order dated 20th May 1999 and restoration of its registration

Filing Reason

Revisional authority allowed developer's revision and directed de-registration on ground of unauthorised constructions by members

Previous Decisions

Divisional Joint Registrar allowed registration on 10th November 1998; developer's revision before Secretary resulted in cancellation on 20th May 1999; High Court admitted petition and granted interim relief on 2nd September 1999

Issues

Whether registration of a co-operative society can be set aside on the ground of unauthorised construction works carried out by some of its members in their flats?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: Unauthorised constructions by members cannot be a ground to cancel registration; relied on Sukhsagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra Respondent (developer) and Municipal Corporation: Supported revisional order, contending that registration would sanction illegal constructions State: Supported revisional authority's findings

Ratio Decidendi

Registration of a co-operative society under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 cannot be set aside on the ground of unauthorised construction works carried out by a few members in their flats; such infractions are to be addressed by the Municipal Corporation under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888

Judgment Excerpts

In my view, registration of society granted under the provisions of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 cannot be set aside on the ground that there were unauthorised construction works carried out by few members of the petitioner society in the flats constructed in the building owned by the society. This Court in the case of Sukhsagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. & Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. (supra) has dealt with similar issue and has held that registration of society does not impinge upon the statutory powers of the Municipal Corporation to determine whether an occupation certificate should be granted or not.

Procedural History

Deputy Registrar granted registration to the society on 21st January 1999. Divisional Joint Registrar, by order dated 10th November 1998, rejected the developer's complaint about unauthorised constructions. The developer filed a revision under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 before the Secretary, Cooperation and Textiles Department. On 20th May 1999, the Secretary allowed the revision, set aside the order dated 10th November 1998, and directed de-registration within one month. The society filed the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution. The High Court admitted the petition on 2nd September 1999 and granted interim relief. The petition was finally heard and decided on 20th July 2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: Section 154
  • Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Compromise Decree in Civil Suit Due to Fraud and Non-Compliance with Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC — Suit Restored for Hearing on Merits. The court held that a compromise decree obtained without a written and signed comprom...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Order De-registering Co-operative Society; Unauthorised Construction by Members Not a Ground for Cancellation Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Court Holds that Municipal Corporation Has Statutory Powers to...