Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Teacher's Writ Petition for Pay Scale Revision and Arrears. Past Service as Shikshan Sevak Counts for Pay Fixation Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shekhar P. Deshmukh, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in the respondent no.4 Junior College on 30th November 1998. His appointment was initially for the academic year 1998-99 on a fixed salary of Rs.5922 per month, and he was continued on similar terms in subsequent years. He was suspended on 6th December 2001 and terminated on 4th April 2006. The School Tribunal set aside the termination and ordered reinstatement, which was upheld by the High Court. The petitioner then sought approval of his services in the pay scale of 9300-34800 + Grade Pay of 4600 with effect from 1st February 2012, considering his past service from 30th November 1998. The impugned order dated 3rd March 2012 granted the pay scale only after completion of the Shikshan Sevak period, ignoring his past service. The court held that the past service as Shikshan Sevak must be counted for pay fixation, and directed the respondents to approve the petitioner's services in the prescribed pay scale with effect from 1st February 2012 and pay arrears from that date.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Pay Scale Fixation - Shikshan Sevak - Past Service - The petitioner, appointed as Assistant Teacher on 30th November 1998, was placed in the pay scale of 9300-34800 + Grade Pay of 4600 only after completion of Shikshan Sevak period, ignoring his past service. The court held that the past service rendered as Shikshan Sevak must be counted for pay fixation, and the impugned order was set aside. (Paras 1-20)

B) Service Law - Approval of Appointment - Arrears - The court directed the respondents to approve the petitioner's services in the prescribed pay scale with effect from 1st February 2012 and pay arrears from that date, considering his past service from 30th November 1998. (Paras 1-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, an Assistant Teacher, is entitled to be placed in the pay scale of 9300-34800 + Grade Pay of 4600 with effect from 1st February 2012, considering his past service as a Shikshan Sevak from 30th November 1998, and whether the impugned order dated 3rd March 2012 granting such pay scale only after completion of Shikshan Sevak period is valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order dated 3rd March 2012 is quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to approve the petitioner's services in the prescribed pay scale with effect from 1st February 2012 and pay arrears from that date, considering his past service from 30th November 1998.

Law Points

  • Pay scale fixation
  • Shikshan Sevak
  • past service
  • approval of appointment
  • arrears
  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act
  • 1977
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (07) 51

WRIT PETITION NO.1166 OF 2018

2018-07-03

S.C. Dharmadhikari, Smt. Bharati H. Dangre

Mr. Mihir Desai, Sr. Counsel with Mr. Chetan Mali i/b Mr. S.S. Jadhav for the petitioner; Mr. Kedar Dighe, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3; Mr. J.K. Jadhav for respondent no.4

Shekhar P. Deshmukh

Deputy Director Education and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging an order placing the petitioner in a pay scale only after completion of Shikshan Sevak period, ignoring past service.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of impugned order dated 3rd March 2012 and direction to approve services in prescribed pay scale with effect from 1st February 2012 with arrears.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's past service as Shikshan Sevak was not considered for pay fixation.

Previous Decisions

School Tribunal set aside termination; writ petition by management disposed of.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to pay scale of 9300-34800 + Grade Pay of 4600 with effect from 1st February 2012 considering his past service from 30th November 1998.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that his past service as Shikshan Sevak should be counted for pay fixation. Respondents contended that the pay scale was correctly granted only after completion of Shikshan Sevak period.

Ratio Decidendi

Past service rendered as Shikshan Sevak must be counted for pay fixation of an Assistant Teacher, and the pay scale should be granted from the date of initial appointment, not from the completion of Shikshan Sevak period.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner, an Assistant Teacher appointed in the respondent no.4 College is constrained to invoke the writ jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court, praying for quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 3rd March 2012, thereby placing the petitioner in the pay scale of 9300 34800 + Grade Pay of 4600 on completion of the period of Shikshan Sevak. The petitioner on acquiring M.Sc (Physics) and B.Ed degree became eligible to be appointed as Assistant Teacher and accordingly, was so appointed in the respondent no.4 Junior College with effect from 30th November 1998.

Procedural History

The petitioner was appointed on 30th November 1998, suspended on 6th December 2001, terminated on 4th April 2006. School Tribunal set aside termination; management's writ petition disposed of. Petitioner then filed this writ petition challenging the order dated 3rd March 2012 regarding pay scale.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Teacher's Writ Petition for Pay Scale Revision and Arrears. Past Service as Shikshan Sevak Counts for Pay Fixation Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Settlement Between Parties — Offences Under Sections 498-A, 452, 323, 504 IPC Quashed as Complainant and Husband Resolve Differences and Live Together. The Court held that inherent powers ...