Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Due to Absence of Live Link and Inconsistent Treatment by Appellate Authority. The Court Holds That Externment Under Section 55 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Requires Proximity Between Offences and Action, and Dismissal of Petitioner’s Appeal While Allowing Co-Externees’ Appeals Demonstrates Non-Application of Mind.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, a shopkeeper running a bag business in Dhule, challenged an externment order passed by the Superintendent of Police, Dhule, under Section 55 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, externing him from Dhule district for two years. Earlier, in 2015, a similar externment proposal was dropped by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate. Subsequently, in 2017, fresh proceedings were initiated based on statements of witnesses recorded on 2 September 2017. A show-cause notice was issued on 12 September 2017, and the petitioner responded. However, the Superintendent of Police passed the externment order on 27 October 2017, citing offences from 2011 to 2015 and alleging that the petitioner operated as part of a gang. The petitioner's appeal before the Divisional Commissioner, Nashik, was dismissed in December 2017, confirming the externment. During the writ petition hearing, it came to light that the Divisional Commissioner had allowed appeals of other alleged gang members against whom identical orders were passed. The High Court found that there was no live link or proximity between the old offences and the externment proceedings; the authorities mechanically relied on stale offences without recent material. Additionally, the inconsistent treatment of co-externees by the appellate authority demonstrated total non-application of mind. Consequently, the court held that the externment order and the appellate order were legally unsustainable. The petition was allowed, and both orders were quashed and set aside, making the rule absolute with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Externment - Live Link - Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, Section 55 - The court held that for externment, there must be a live link and proximity between the offences registered and the initiation of proceedings; mere reference to stale offences from years prior (2011-2015) without any recent material vitiates the order - Held that externment order invalid due to lack of live link (Paras 8-9).

B) Administrative Law - Non-Application of Mind - Gang Externment - Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 - The appellate authority dismissed the petitioner's appeal while allowing appeals of other alleged gang members on the same facts, indicating non-application of mind - Held that such inconsistent approach renders the order unsustainable (Paras 10-11).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the externment order passed under Section 55 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 is valid when there is no live link between the offences and the externment proceedings, and when the appellate authority has inconsistently dealt with co-externees?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition allowed; externment order dated 27.10.2017 and appellate order dated December 2017 quashed; rule made absolute in terms of prayer clause 'C'.

Law Points

  • Externment under Maharashtra Police Act requires live link between offences and action
  • past externment proceedings dropped cannot be revived without fresh material
  • appellate authority must apply mind consistently to similarly placed persons
  • lack of proximity renders externment invalid
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (07) 2

Criminal Writ Petition No. 41 of 2018

2018-07-05

S.S. Shinde, V.K. Jadhav

P.B. Pawar, K.S. Hoke Patil

Sachin Bhaskar Badgujar

State of Maharashtra & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition challenging externment order passed under Section 55 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks quashing of externment order dated 27.10.2017 and appellate order confirming it.

Filing Reason

Petitioner alleged that externment proceedings were based on stale offences with no live link, earlier dropped proceedings were revived without fresh material, and the appellate authority inconsistently treated co-externees.

Previous Decisions

Sub-Divisional Magistrate dropped externment proposal in 2015; later SP, Dhule passed externment order on 27.10.2017, confirmed by Divisional Commissioner, Nashik in December 2017.

Issues

Whether the externment order is vitiated due to lack of live link between the offences and the proceedings? Whether the appellate authority's inconsistent treatment of gang members demonstrates non-application of mind?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that earlier dropped proceedings were revived without fresh material, and there was no proximity between offences (2011-2015) and externment of 2017; relied on precedents. State argued that externment was properly done under Section 55 after following procedure and based on material showing petitioner was operating as a gang member.

Ratio Decidendi

For externment under Section 55 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, there must be a live link and proximity between the offences relied upon and the initiation of proceedings; stale offences without recent material cannot justify externment. Appellate authority must apply mind consistently and cannot treat similarly situated persons differently on same facts.

Judgment Excerpts

there is no live link and proximity between the registration of the said offences and initiation of the present externment proceedings. Thus it appears that, there is total nonapplication of mind by the Divisional Commissioner while passing the order in the appeal filed by the petitioner and the another appeal filed by the members of the alleged gang.

Procedural History

In 2015, police proposed externment but Sub-Divisional Magistrate dropped proceedings. On 27.10.2017, Superintendent of Police, Dhule passed externment order for two years from Dhule district under Section 55 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. Petitioner appealed to Divisional Commissioner, Nashik, which dismissed the appeal in December 2017. Petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 41 of 2018 before Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Police Act, 1951: Section 55
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA Appeals in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Acquisition for J.P. Nagar Layout Declared Lapsed. Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 mandates award within two years of final notification; failure results in la...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Due to Absence of Live Link and Inconsistent Treatment by Appellate Authority. The Court Holds That Externment Under Section 55 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Requires Proximity Between Offences and Act...