Bombay High Court Allows Furlough Application Remand After Deletion of Restrictive Rule. Pending Appeal No Longer a Bar to Furlough Under Maharashtra Prisons (Mumbai Furlough and Parole) (Amendment) Rules, 2016.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sahebrao Kaluram Bhintade, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the rejection of his furlough application. He had applied for furlough on 4.9.2017, which was rejected by the Sanctioning Authority on 30.11.2017 on the ground that his appeal against conviction and sentence was pending before a higher court, relying on sub-Rule 11 of Rule 4 of the Maharashtra Prisons (Mumbai Furlough and Parole) (Amendment) Rules, 2016. His appeal against that rejection was dismissed on 12.2.2018. However, during the pendency of the writ petition, the State Government issued a Notification dated 16.4.2018 deleting sub-Rule 11 of Rule 4. The Court noted that the sole ground for rejection no longer existed. Consequently, the Court set aside the impugned orders dated 30.11.2017 and 12.2.2018 and remanded the matter back to the Sanctioning Authority for fresh consideration of the petitioner's furlough application, without being influenced by the pendency of the appeal. The rule was made absolute in those terms.

Headnote

A) Prisons Law - Furlough - Pending Appeal - Sub-Rule 11 of Rule 4 of Maharashtra Prisons (Mumbai Furlough and Parole) (Amendment) Rules, 2016 - The petitioner's furlough application was rejected on the ground that his appeal against conviction was pending, relying on sub-Rule 11 of Rule 4. However, the said rule was deleted by Notification dated 16.4.2018. The Court held that since the rule no longer exists, the rejection orders are unsustainable and set aside, remanding the matter for fresh consideration (Paras 3-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the pendency of an appeal against conviction can be a ground to reject a furlough application under the Maharashtra Prisons (Mumbai Furlough and Parole) (Amendment) Rules, 2016, after the deletion of sub-Rule 11 of Rule 4.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned orders dated 30.11.2017 and 12.2.2018 are set aside. The matter is remanded back to the Sanctioning Authority for considering the petitioner's furlough application afresh. Rule made absolute.

Law Points

  • Furlough
  • Pending appeal
  • Deletion of rule
  • Remand
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (06) 203

Criminal Writ Petition No. 1327 of 2018

2018-06-15

Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, Acting C.J., M.S. Sonak, J.

2018:BHC-AS:15271-DB

Mr. Daulat G. Khamkar (for Petitioner), Mr. Arfan Sait (APP for State)

Sahebrao Kaluram Bhintade

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition challenging rejection of furlough application.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought setting aside of orders rejecting furlough and direction for grant of furlough.

Filing Reason

Furlough application rejected on ground of pending appeal against conviction.

Previous Decisions

Furlough application rejected on 30.11.2017; appeal dismissed on 12.2.2018.

Issues

Whether the pendency of an appeal against conviction can be a ground to reject furlough after deletion of sub-Rule 11 of Rule 4.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the rule relied upon for rejection has been deleted. State conceded the deletion of the rule.

Ratio Decidendi

Since sub-Rule 11 of Rule 4 of the Maharashtra Prisons (Mumbai Furlough and Parole) (Amendment) Rules, 2016, which allowed rejection of furlough on the ground of pending appeal, has been deleted by Notification dated 16.4.2018, the rejection orders based on that rule are unsustainable and must be set aside, and the matter remanded for fresh consideration.

Judgment Excerpts

One of the main grounds for rejecting the application of the petitioner for furlough is that the appeal preferred by him against his conviction and sentence is pending before the higher court. This was in view of sub-Rule 11 of Rule 4 of the Maharashtra Prisons (Mumbai Furlough and Parole) (Amendment) Rules, 2016. However, it is an admitted fact that the said Rule has been deleted by Notification dated 16.4.2018.

Procedural History

Petitioner applied for furlough on 4.9.2017; rejected on 30.11.2017; appeal dismissed on 12.2.2018; filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1327 of 2018; heard on 15.6.2018 and disposed.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Prisons (Mumbai Furlough and Parole) (Amendment) Rules, 2016: Rule 4, sub-Rule 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Trustees' Petition Challenging Charity Commissioner's Order in Trust Dispute — Appointment of Receiver Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction and Procedural Irregularity. The Court held that the Charity Commissioner exceeded hi...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Furlough Application Remand After Deletion of Restrictive Rule. Pending Appeal No Longer a Bar to Furlough Under Maharashtra Prisons (Mumbai Furlough and Parole) (Amendment) Rules, 2016.