Bombay High Court Adjourns Writ Petition in Trust Dispute Due to Counsel's Unavailability. Matter listed for 2nd May 2018 after Civil Application disposed on 9th March 2018.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Bombay High Court was hearing Civil Application No.1232 of 2016 in Writ Petition No.1927 of 2013, filed by Sir Mohammad Yusuf Trust against Unmish Manharlal Udani. On 20th April 2018, the matter was listed but the petitioner's counsel informed the court that his arguing counsel was busy and requested time beyond the vacation. The court noted that the Civil Application had already been disposed of on 9th March 2018. Consequently, the court adjourned the writ petition to 2nd May 2018. No other substantive issues were addressed.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Adjournment - Counsel's Unavailability - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order XVII - The court adjourned the writ petition to 2nd May 2018 as the petitioner's arguing counsel was busy, noting that the Civil Application had already been disposed of on 9th March 2018. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the writ petition should be adjourned due to counsel's unavailability.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ Petition adjourned to 2nd May 2018.

Law Points

  • Adjournment granted due to counsel's unavailability
  • Civil Application disposed
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (04) 179

Civil Application No.1232 of 2016 in Writ Petition No.1927 of 2013

2018-04-20

K.K. Tated, B.P. Colabawalla

2018:BHC-AS:7319-DB

P.S. Dani, Sr. Counsel with Sahil Sayyed, Nikhil Apte i/b M/s Wadia Ghandy and Co. for Applicant; Nishant Tripathi with Vaibhav Matkar, Somnath Iyer i/b M/s M. Tripathi and Co. for Respondent

Sir Mohammad Yusuf Trust

Unmish Manharlal Udani

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil application in writ petition

Remedy Sought

Adjournment of writ petition

Filing Reason

Counsel for petitioner was busy

Previous Decisions

Civil Application disposed on 9th March 2018

Issues

Whether the writ petition should be adjourned due to counsel's unavailability.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel submitted that his arguing counsel is busy and requested time beyond vacation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court granted adjournment as the petitioner's counsel was unavailable, noting that the Civil Application had already been disposed of.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned counsel for Petitioner submits that his arguing counsel is busy today. Writ Petition stand over to 2nd May 2018.

Procedural History

Civil Application No.1232 of 2016 was filed in Writ Petition No.1927 of 2013. The Civil Application was disposed on 9th March 2018. On 20th April 2018, the matter was listed but adjourned due to counsel's unavailability.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order in Cooperative Society Dispute — Revision Under Section 154 of MCS Act Allowed Without Proper Hearing. Minister's order set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice and failure to consid...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Adjourns Writ Petition in Trust Dispute Due to Counsel's Unavailability. Matter listed for 2nd May 2018 after Civil Application disposed on 9th March 2018.