Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 11
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The State of Maharashtra and the complainant Smt. Shobha Giri challenged the judgment of acquittal passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad in Sessions Trial No. 2/2002, acquitting the respondents/accused for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case was that on 20-9-2001 at about 8.30 p.m., the complainant's husband returned from the field and a quarrel ensued between her father-in-law and brother-in-law regarding partition of property. The accused allegedly assaulted the deceased with sticks and axes, causing his death. The trial court acquitted the accused, finding the evidence unreliable. The High Court, in appeal, examined the evidence and found that the prosecution witnesses turned hostile or gave contradictory statements. The medical evidence did not support the prosecution version. The court held that the trial court's acquittal was not perverse and dismissed the appeal and revision, upholding the acquittal.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Acquittal - Section 302 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Appeal against acquittal - Prosecution case based on oral report of complainant - Witnesses turned hostile or gave contradictory statements - Medical evidence not supporting prosecution version - Held that the trial court's acquittal was not perverse and no interference warranted (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the judgment of acquittal passed by the trial court is perverse and liable to be set aside.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal and revision dismissed; acquittal upheld

Law Points

  • Acquittal upheld
  • lack of credible evidence
  • unreliable witnesses
  • benefit of doubt
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 34 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (03) 144

Criminal Appeal No. 679 of 2005 with Criminal Revision Application No. 223 of 2005

2018-03-09

B. R. Gavai, M. G. Giratkar

Shri N. R. Patil, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State/appellant in Appeal 679/05 and for nonapplicant no. 1 in Revn. No. 223/2005; Shri K. S. Narwade, Advocate for the applicant in Revn. No. 223/2005

State of Maharashtra

Dnyaneshwar Govindgir @ Babangir Giri and Manikpuri Vithalbuwa Puri

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against acquittal in murder case

Remedy Sought

State and complainant sought reversal of acquittal and conviction of accused

Filing Reason

Trial court acquitted accused for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC

Previous Decisions

Trial court acquitted all accused in Sessions Trial No. 2/2002

Issues

Whether the judgment of acquittal is perverse and liable to be set aside

Submissions/Arguments

Prosecution argued that trial court erred in acquitting accused despite evidence Defense argued that prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt

Ratio Decidendi

The trial court's acquittal was not perverse as the prosecution evidence was unreliable and witnesses turned hostile; no interference warranted.

Judgment Excerpts

The case of the prosecution against the respondents/accused in short is as under. The trial court acquitted the accused, finding the evidence unreliable.

Procedural History

Sessions Trial No. 2/2002 resulted in acquittal; State filed Criminal Appeal No. 679/2005 and complainant filed Criminal Revision Application No. 223/2005 before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Motion to Strike Caveat in Probate Suit — Consent Terms in Related Suit Bar Challenge to Caveator's Interest. The Plaintiff's own consent terms in a related suit acknowledging the Defendant's claim to shares precluded th...