Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Abetment of Suicide and Cruelty in Dowry Demand Case. Appellant convicted under Sections 498A and 306 IPC for subjecting wife to cruelty and driving her to suicide due to unlawful demand of Rs.50,000.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 66
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Ashok Moon, was convicted by the 3rd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Sessions Trial 78/2003 for offences under Sections 498A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three years and seven years respectively, with fines. He was acquitted under Section 304B IPC. The marriage of the deceased Sulekha and the appellant was solemnized in April 2001. Within 2-3 months, Sulekha left the matrimonial home due to cruelty, including physical assault and a demand of Rs.50,000. She hanged herself at her parental home on 04.04.2003. An oral report (Exh.27) was lodged by her father, P.W.1 Udhav Kolhe, alleging cruelty and an illicit relationship. The prosecution relied on the evidence of P.W.1 and P.W.2 (mother Asha Kolhe) and a suicide note (Exh.53). The court found the evidence credible and the suicide note corroborated the allegations. The appeal challenged the conviction, but the High Court upheld it, finding no merit in the appeal. The court held that the prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt, and the suicide note was a dying declaration. The appeal was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Abetment of Suicide - Section 306 IPC - Conviction upheld where deceased wife committed suicide due to cruelty and unlawful demand of Rs.50,000 by husband - Suicide note corroborated by oral evidence of parents - Held that the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant abetted suicide (Paras 1-10).

B) Criminal Law - Cruelty by Husband - Section 498A IPC - Conviction upheld where appellant subjected wife to physical and mental cruelty for dowry demand - Evidence of parents and suicide note established cruelty - Held that the appellant is guilty of cruelty (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant is guilty of abetment of suicide and cruelty based on evidence of parents and suicide note.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction and sentence under Sections 498A and 306 IPC upheld.

Law Points

  • Abetment of suicide
  • Cruelty by husband
  • Dowry demand
  • Suicide note as dying declaration
  • Conviction under Section 306 IPC
  • Conviction under Section 498A IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (02) 135

Criminal Appeal No.411 of 2004

2018-02-09

Rohit B. Deo, J.

Shri C.R. Thakur for Appellant, Shri P.S. Tembhare, APP for Respondent

Ashok s/o Haribhau Moon

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for offences under Sections 498A and 306 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction and sentence.

Filing Reason

Appellant aggrieved by judgment and order dated 28.05.2004 convicting him under Sections 498A and 306 IPC.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Sections 498A and 306 IPC, acquitted under Section 304B IPC.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 306 IPC is sustainable? Whether the conviction under Section 498A IPC is sustainable?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence of parents is interested and unreliable. Appellant argued that the suicide note does not prove abetment.

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence of parents and the suicide note clearly establish that the appellant subjected the deceased to cruelty and abetted her suicide. The suicide note is a dying declaration and corroborates the oral evidence.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant is aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 28.05.2004 passed by the 3rd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Sessions Trial 78/2003, by and under which, the appellant is convicted for offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code... The prosecution case, as is unfolded during the trial, is thus: The marriage of deceased Sau. Sulekha and the accused was solemnized in April, 2001.

Procedural History

Trial court convicted appellant on 28.05.2004. Appellant filed Criminal Appeal No.411 of 2004 in Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. Judgment reserved on 12.12.2017 and pronounced on 09.02.2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 498A, 306, 304B
  • Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961: 3, 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction for Restoration of Possession in Suit for Specific Performance and Possession — Plaintiff Establishes Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience in His Favor.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Lacked Completeness and Chain of Circumstances Was Not Established.