Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Maharashtra Money Lending Act Case — No Prima Facie Case of Business of Money Lending. Court holds that mere lending of money without license does not constitute an offence under Sections 23, 39, 45, and 48 of the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014 unless the lender is a 'money lender' as defined under Section 2(10) of the Act.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 115
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicants, Baliram Ashroba Kadape, Ashroba Maruti Kadape, and Namdeo Achyutrao Pote, filed Criminal Application No. 3884 of 2017 under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 09/2017 registered at Ashti Police Station, District Jalna, for offences under Sections 23, 39, 45, and 48 of the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014. The FIR was lodged by Sanjeev Dadasaheb Deore, Assistant Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Partur, alleging that the applicants were engaged in money lending without a valid license. The applicants contended that they were not 'money lenders' as defined under the Act and that the loans given were personal and not part of any business. They argued that the FIR was mala fide and politically motivated, as applicant no. 1 had political differences with the local guardian minister. The State opposed the quashing, submitting that the applicants had admitted to lending money and that the Act does not require the lender to be a habitual money lender. The court examined the definition of 'money lender' under Section 2(10) of the Act, which requires the person to be engaged in the business of money lending. The court noted that the FIR did not contain any allegation that the applicants were carrying on the business of money lending. The loans were given to acquaintances and relatives, and there was no evidence of systematic lending. The court held that the essential ingredients of the offence were missing, and continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of process. Accordingly, the court quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings. The connected application for intervention was disposed of.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Quashing of FIR - Inherent powers - FIR can be quashed if no prima facie case is made out and continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law. (Paras 1-10)

B) Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014 - Sections 23, 39, 45, 48 - Offence of money lending without license - Definition of 'money lender' - The Act defines 'money lender' as a person who carries on the business of money lending. Mere lending of money, even without license, does not attract penal provisions unless the lender is engaged in the business of money lending. (Paras 5-8)

C) Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014 - Section 2(10) - Definition of 'money lender' - The term 'money lender' includes a person who advances loan in the course of his business. Isolated or occasional loans by individuals not in the business of money lending are excluded. (Para 6)

D) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Quashing of FIR - Abuse of process - Where the allegations in the FIR do not disclose the essential ingredients of the alleged offence, the FIR is liable to be quashed to prevent abuse of the process of court. (Paras 9-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR registered against the applicants for offences under Sections 23, 39, 45, and 48 of the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014 deserves to be quashed for lack of prima facie case.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and quashed FIR No. 09/2017 registered at Ashti Police Station and all consequential proceedings. The connected application for intervention was disposed of.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR
  • Prima facie case
  • Money lending
  • Definition of money lender
  • Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act
  • 2014
  • Sections 23
  • 39
  • 45
  • 48
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (02) 28

Criminal Application No. 3884 of 2017 with Criminal Application No. 4555 of 2017

2018-02-09

S. S. Shinde, A. M. Dhavale

Mr S. S. Thombre, Mr V. M. Kagne, Mr S. V. Mundhe

Baliram S/o Ashroba Kadape, Ashroba S/o Maruti Kadape, Namdeo S/o Achyutrao Pote

The State of Maharashtra, Sanjeev S/o Dadasaheb Deore, The Police Inspector, Police Station, Ashti

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No. 09/2017 registered at Ashti Police Station for offences under Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014

Filing Reason

Applicants alleged that the FIR was mala fide and lacked prima facie case as they were not 'money lenders' under the Act

Issues

Whether the FIR discloses a prima facie case for offences under Sections 23, 39, 45, and 48 of the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014? Whether the applicants are 'money lenders' as defined under Section 2(10) of the Act?

Submissions/Arguments

Applicants argued that they are not money lenders and the loans were personal; FIR is politically motivated. State argued that lending without license is an offence under the Act regardless of whether it is a business.

Ratio Decidendi

For an offence under the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014, the accused must be a 'money lender' as defined under Section 2(10), i.e., a person engaged in the business of money lending. Mere lending of money without a license does not constitute an offence unless the lender is in the business of money lending. Where the FIR does not allege that the accused is in the business of money lending, the essential ingredients of the offence are missing, and the FIR is liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The three applicants seek quashing of FIR registered at C.R. No. 09/2017 at Ashti Police Station, Tq. Partur, against them for offences punishable u/s 23, 39, 45 & 48 of Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014. The definition of 'money lender' under Section 2(10) of the Act requires the person to be engaged in the business of money lending. The FIR does not contain any allegation that the applicants were carrying on the business of money lending.

Procedural History

The applicants filed Criminal Application No. 3884 of 2017 under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR. Another application, Criminal Application No. 4555 of 2017, was filed by complainants for intervention. The court heard both matters together and passed judgment on 09.02.2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014: 23, 39, 45, 48, 2(10)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows NGO's Writ Petition for Tree Plantation on Government Land Under Environmental Law — Directs Authorities to Consider Representation for Environmental Conservation. The court held that while a writ of mandamus cannot compel ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Maharashtra Money Lending Act Case — No Prima Facie Case of Business of Money Lending. Court holds that mere lending of money without license does not constitute an offence under Sections 23, 39, 45, and 48 of the M...