Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Case — Permanent Disability Assessed at 60% Leads to Additional Award for Loss of Earning Capacity. Multiplier of 15 Applied to Monthly Income of Rs.4,460 Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Bhimrao Shamrao Shinde, was travelling in a tempo trax vehicle on 19 May 1996 when the vehicle met with an accident due to rash and negligent driving, dashing against a roadside tree. The appellant sustained severe injuries including a fracture to his right femur, resulting in 60% permanent disability. He was hospitalized at Yavatmal, Nagpur, and Pune until August 1996. At the time of the accident, he was 37 years old and working as an Agricultural Overseer with a monthly salary of Rs.4,460. He filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation of Rs.6,00,000. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Yavatmal, by judgment dated 28 March 2005, awarded Rs.6,925 for loss of salary for 47 days, Rs.1,03,670 for medical expenses, and Rs.5,000 for mental and physical pains, totaling Rs.1,15,595. Dissatisfied, the appellant appealed for enhancement. The High Court considered the issue of compensation for loss of earning capacity due to permanent disability. The court noted that the appellant's disability was 60% and that his job as an Agricultural Overseer required physical activity, which was impaired. Applying the multiplier method, the court calculated loss of earning capacity as Rs.4,460 x 12 x 15 x 60% = Rs.4,81,680. The court also enhanced the award for pain and suffering from Rs.5,000 to Rs.25,000. The total compensation was enhanced to Rs.6,17,275, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the claim petition. The appeal was allowed in part.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation for Permanent Disability - Loss of Earning Capacity - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 - The appellant suffered 60% permanent disability due to fracture of right femur in a road accident. The Tribunal awarded only medical expenses and loss of salary for 47 days but did not grant compensation for loss of earning capacity. The High Court held that the appellant was entitled to compensation for loss of earning capacity based on his monthly income of Rs.4,460, applying a multiplier of 15 and 60% disability, resulting in an additional award of Rs.4,81,680. (Paras 7-10)

B) Motor Accident Claims - Heads of Compensation - Pain and Suffering - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 - The Tribunal awarded only Rs.5,000 for mental and physical pains. The High Court enhanced this amount to Rs.25,000 considering the nature of injuries and prolonged treatment. (Para 11)

C) Motor Accident Claims - Medical Expenses - Reimbursement - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 - The Tribunal awarded Rs.1,03,670 towards medical expenses based on bills produced. The High Court upheld this amount as it was supported by evidence. (Para 6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal erred in not awarding compensation for loss of earning capacity due to permanent disability and whether the compensation granted was just and proper.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed in part. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal is enhanced from Rs.1,15,595 to Rs.6,17,275. The appellant is entitled to interest at 6% per annum on the enhanced amount from the date of the claim petition till realization. The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. is directed to deposit the enhanced amount within eight weeks.

Law Points

  • Compensation for permanent disability
  • Loss of earning capacity
  • Multiplier method
  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988 Section 166
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (01) 124

First Appeal (FA) No. 562 of 2005

2018-01-16

Manish Pitale, J.

Shri U.L. Chhangani holding for Shri S.U. Nemade for appellant; Respondent No.1 served; Shri S.K. Pardhy for respondent No.2

Bhimrao Shamrao Shinde

Ramesh Sitaram Devkar, The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against judgment of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal seeking enhancement of compensation for injuries sustained in a road accident.

Remedy Sought

Enhancement of compensation from Rs.1,15,595 to Rs.6,00,000 for permanent disability and other losses.

Filing Reason

Dissatisfaction with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Yavatmal, awarded Rs.1,15,595 on 28.03.2005 in Motor Accident Claim No. 56 of 1997.

Issues

Whether the appellant is entitled to compensation for loss of earning capacity due to permanent disability? Whether the compensation awarded for pain and suffering is adequate?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the Tribunal erred in not awarding compensation for loss of earning capacity despite 60% permanent disability, and that the amount for pain and suffering was too low. Respondent Insurance Company argued that the Tribunal's award was just and proper.

Ratio Decidendi

In motor accident claims, compensation for permanent disability must include loss of earning capacity calculated by applying the multiplier method based on the injured's income and percentage of disability. The multiplier should be as per the age of the claimant. Pain and suffering compensation should be commensurate with the nature of injuries and duration of treatment.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant was 37 years old when the accident took place and he was working as an Agricultural Overseer... drawing a monthly salary of Rs.4,460/ only. The appellant suffered permanent disability of 60 per cent. The Tribunal ought to have granted compensation for loss of earning capacity... applying the multiplier of 15... the loss of earning capacity would be Rs.4,81,680/. The amount of Rs.5,000/ awarded towards mental and physical pains is on the lower side... enhanced to Rs.25,000/.

Procedural History

The appellant filed claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Yavatmal, which was registered as Motor Accident Claim No. 56 of 1997. The Tribunal passed judgment on 28.03.2005 awarding Rs.1,15,595. Aggrieved, the appellant filed the present First Appeal No. 562 of 2005 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. The appeal was reserved on 08.01.2018 and judgment pronounced on 16.01.2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Case — Permanent Disability Assessed at 60% Leads to Additional Award for Loss of Earning Capacity. Multiplier of 15 Applied to Monthly Income of Rs.4,460 Under Section 166...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in NDPS Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Search and Seizure Procedures. Failure to Join Independent Witnesses and Non-Production of Seized Contraband Before Court Renders Conviction Unsustainable U...