Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as incident occurred during a sudden quarrel without premeditation, reducing offence to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Nitin Vithalrao Parab, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of Pawankumar Jain under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution case was that on 2 July 2010, the appellant and the deceased were together in a Maruti 800 car. Later, an accident was reported near Jyoti Panjab Hotel, where the appellant was nabbed by the crowd and the deceased was found unconscious and later died. The appellant was charged with murder. The High Court, on appeal, examined the evidence and found that the incident occurred during a sudden quarrel without premeditation. The court noted that the appellant did not take undue advantage or act in a cruel manner. Applying Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, the court held that the offence was culpable homicide not amounting to murder, punishable under Section 304 Part I IPC. The court set aside the conviction under Section 302 IPC and convicted the appellant under Section 304 Part I IPC, sentencing him to the period already undergone (about 7 years and 6 months) and reducing the fine.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 IPC - Conviction set aside - The appellant was convicted for murder of Pawankumar Jain. The court examined whether the act was done with intention to cause death or with knowledge that it is likely to cause death. Held that the incident occurred during a sudden quarrel without premeditation, and the appellant did not take undue advantage or act in a cruel manner. The offence falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, punishable under Section 304 Part I IPC (Paras 10-14).

B) Criminal Law - Culpable Homicide - Section 304 Part I IPC - Sudden Quarrel - Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC - The court applied the principle that when a death occurs in a sudden fight in the heat of passion upon a sudden quarrel, and the offender does not take undue advantage or act in a cruel or unusual manner, the offence is culpable homicide not amounting to murder. Held that the appellant is liable under Section 304 Part I IPC (Paras 10-14).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murder is sustainable in law, or whether the offence falls under a lesser degree of culpable homicide.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside. Appellant convicted under Section 304 Part I IPC and sentenced to the period already undergone (about 7 years and 6 months). Fine reduced to Rs. 5,000/-.

Law Points

  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 304 Part I IPC
  • Section 304 Part II IPC
  • Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC
  • Sudden quarrel
  • Absence of premeditation
  • Culpable homicide not amounting to murder
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018:BHC-AS:1210-DB

Criminal Appeal No.401 of 2012

2018-01-13

B. R. Gavai, Bharati H. Dangre

2018:BHC-AS:1210-DB

Mr. Nitin Pradhan with Mr. Ashok Mishra and Mr. Prem Tanna i/b SOLICIS LEX for the Appellant, Mrs. Ashwini Takalkar, APP for the State

Nitin Vithalrao Parab

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal or reduction of sentence

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment

Previous Decisions

Sessions Court convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable Whether the offence falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the incident occurred during a sudden quarrel without premeditation State argued that the appellant intentionally caused death

Ratio Decidendi

When a death occurs in a sudden fight in the heat of passion upon a sudden quarrel, and the offender does not take undue advantage or act in a cruel or unusual manner, the offence is culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, punishable under Section 304 Part I IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The incident had occurred during a sudden quarrel without any premeditation. The appellant did not take any undue advantage or act in a cruel or unusual manner. The offence would fall under Exception 4 to Section 300 of IPC and would be punishable under Section 304 Part I of IPC.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.661 of 2010 for offence under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appealed to the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 304, 300
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as incident occurred during a sudden quarrel without premeditation, reducing offence to culpable homicide not...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Possession and Title Based on Registered Sale...