Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Assistant Teacher in Primary School — Violation of Natural Justice and Section 5 of MEPS Act, 1977. Termination order set aside as no prior approval was obtained from the Education Officer and no inquiry was conducted before dismissal.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 130
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Rajeshree Hanumantrao Rokade, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in a primary school run by respondent no.3 trust. She was terminated from service by an order dated 19.03.2016 without any inquiry and without obtaining prior approval of the Education Officer as required under Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. The petitioner challenged the termination by filing a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The court considered the provisions of the Act and held that the termination was in gross violation of the statutory requirements and principles of natural justice. The court allowed the petition, set aside the termination order, and directed reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Termination of Teacher - Prior Approval - Section 5 of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher and her services were terminated without any inquiry and without obtaining prior approval of the Education Officer - Held that termination is illegal and set aside - Petitioner entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the termination of the petitioner from the post of Assistant Teacher without conducting any inquiry and without obtaining prior approval of the Education Officer under Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 is legal and valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The termination order dated 19.03.2016 is quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner with continuity of service and full back wages.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • prior approval requirement
  • termination without inquiry
  • Section 5 of MEPS Act
  • 1977
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (01) 18

Writ Petition No.7963 of 2016

2018-01-30

S.S. Shinde, K.K. Sonawane

Mr. S.S. Jadhavar for petitioner, Mr. S.Y. Mahajan (Addl.G.P.) for respondent no.1, Mr. P.R. Tandale for respondent no.2, Mr. D.D. Sarwade for respondent nos.3 and 4

Rajeshree Hanumantrao Rokade

State of Maharashtra, Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Latur, Dnyandan Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Primary School, Vaibhav Nagar, Latur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging termination of service of an assistant teacher.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of termination order dated 19.03.2016 and reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.

Filing Reason

Termination without inquiry and without prior approval of Education Officer under Section 5 of MEPS Act, 1977.

Issues

Whether termination of petitioner without inquiry and without prior approval under Section 5 of MEPS Act, 1977 is valid.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that termination was illegal as no inquiry was conducted and no prior approval was obtained. Respondents argued that the petitioner was not a permanent employee and termination was justified.

Ratio Decidendi

Termination of an employee without conducting an inquiry and without obtaining prior approval of the Education Officer under Section 5 of the MEPS Act, 1977 is illegal and violative of principles of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The termination of the petitioner without any inquiry and without prior approval of the Education Officer is illegal. The petitioner is entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.7963 of 2016 before the Bombay High Court challenging the termination order dated 19.03.2016. The petition was reserved on 22.01.2018 and pronounced on 30.01.2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977: Section 5
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Committal Proceedings for Criminal Breach of Trust, Confirms Commitment Order. Accused Committed Under Section 120B read with Sections 409, 477A IPC; Court Holds Magistrate Need Not Be Satisfied as to Guilt, Onl...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Settlement Commission Order in Customs Duty Case — Jurisdictional Condition Under Section 127B Not Fulfilled. Settlement Commission lacked jurisdiction to entertain application under Section 127B of the Customs Act, 1962 a...