Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment based on change of opinion without new tangible material is invalid.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 20
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, an individual assessee, filed his income tax return for Assessment Year 2010-11 on 30 March 2011 declaring income of ₹1.70 Crore and showing a capital receipt of ₹1.30 Crore. The original assessment was completed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Subsequently, the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax issued a notice under Section 148 seeking to reopen the assessment. The petitioner sought reasons, which were supplied on 24 July 2017. The reasons indicated that the Assessing Officer wanted to examine the capital receipt of ₹1.30 Crore which was claimed as exempt. The petitioner filed objections on 7 August 2017, which were disposed of by an order dated 16 August 2017. The petitioner then approached the High Court challenging the notice. The court examined the reasons recorded and found that the Assessing Officer had already considered the capital receipt during the original assessment and had applied his mind. The court held that reopening based on the same material without any fresh tangible information amounts to a change of opinion, which is not permissible under Section 147. The court quashed the notice and the order disposing of objections.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Reopening of Assessment - Section 147, 148 Income Tax Act, 1961 - Reassessment based on change of opinion - The Assessing Officer reopened assessment on the ground that the assessee had shown capital receipt of ₹1.30 Crore which was claimed as exempt but the officer had already examined this during original assessment - Held that reopening without fresh tangible material is a mere change of opinion and not permissible (Paras 6-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reopening of assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 based on the same material as originally considered is valid when the Assessing Officer had already applied his mind during the original assessment.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the notice dated 30 March 2017 issued under Section 148 and the order dated 16 August 2017 disposing of objections. Rule made absolute.

Law Points

  • Reopening of assessment under Section 147 requires fresh tangible material
  • mere change of opinion is not permissible
  • reasons recorded must be examined independently
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (11) 229

WRIT PETITION NO.929 OF 2017

2017-11-21

N.M. Jamdar, Nutan D. Sardessai

2017:BHC-GOA:3165-DB

Nitin Sardessai, Gautami Kamat, Amira Razaq

Cedric De Souza Faria

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Commissioner of Income Tax, Union of India, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Central Circle), Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka (Central)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging reopening of assessment under Section 148 of Income Tax Act

Remedy Sought

Quashing of notice dated 30 March 2017 issued under Section 148 and order dated 16 August 2017 disposing of objections

Filing Reason

Assessee aggrieved by reopening of assessment on ground of change of opinion without fresh material

Previous Decisions

Original assessment completed under Section 143(3); objections to reopening disposed of by order dated 16 August 2017

Issues

Whether reopening of assessment under Section 147 based on same material as original assessment is valid Whether the reasons recorded for reopening disclose a change of opinion

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the reopening is based on a mere change of opinion as the Assessing Officer had already examined the capital receipt during original assessment Respondents contended that the reopening was justified as the assessee had not fully disclosed the nature of the receipt

Ratio Decidendi

Reopening of assessment under Section 147 requires fresh tangible material; mere change of opinion on the same material is not permissible. The Assessing Officer must have reason to believe that income has escaped assessment based on new information.

Judgment Excerpts

Section 147 of the Income Tax Act deals with the concept of Income Escaping Assessment. The reasons recorded must be examined to see if there is any fresh tangible material.

Procedural History

Original assessment completed under Section 143(3) for AY 2010-11. Notice under Section 148 issued on 30 March 2017. Assessee sought reasons on 7 April 2017, reasons supplied on 24 July 2017. Objections filed on 7 August 2017, disposed of on 16 August 2017. Writ petition filed challenging notice and order. Ad interim relief granted on 7 November 2017. Final hearing on 21 November 2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 147, 148, 143(3)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment based on change of opinion without new tangible material is invalid.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Reference Application in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Service of Notice Under Section 12(2). The court permitted the petitioners to amend their reference application to plead that no notice under Section 12(2...