Bombay High Court Suspends Sentence of Convict in POCSO Case Pending Appeal Due to Short Term and Pendency. The court suspended the execution of one-year rigorous imprisonment under Section 354 IPC and Section 8 POCSO Act, 2012, pending appeal, citing that the applicant would otherwise undergo the sentence before the appeal is heard.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Yogesh Subhash Sanap, was convicted in Special (Child) Sessions Case No. 334 of 2014 by the Special Judge, Pune, for offences under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012. He was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year and a fine of Rs.1,000, with default imprisonment of one month. He filed Criminal Application No. 1418 of 2017 in the pending Criminal Appeal No. 856 of 2017 seeking suspension of the sentence and release on bail. The High Court noted that the sentence was short (one year) and the appeal, filed in 2017, was unlikely to be heard for several years due to the large pendency of old cases. The applicant had been on bail during the trial and had not violated any bail conditions. Considering these facts, the court found it a fit case to suspend the execution of sentence pending disposal of the appeal. The court allowed the application, suspended the sentence, and directed the applicant to furnish a fresh bail bond of Rs.15,000 with one or two solvent sureties to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, Pune. The applicant was also ordered not to interfere with the prosecution witnesses.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Suspension of Sentence Pending Appeal - Section 389 CrPC - Short Term Imprisonment - The applicant was convicted under Section 354 IPC and sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment. The appeal was filed in 2017 and not likely to be heard for years due to pendency. The court held that rejection of the application would result in the applicant undergoing the sentence before the appeal is heard on merits, and thus suspended the sentence subject to bail conditions (Paras 3-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the execution of sentence should be suspended pending appeal when the sentence is short and the appeal is not likely to be heard soon due to pendency.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Criminal Application No. 1418 of 2017 is allowed. Execution of sentence imposed in Special Sessions Case No. 334 of 2014 vide judgment dated 8th September, 2017 is suspended till disposal of the appeal on merits, subject to the applicant furnishing fresh bail bond of Rs.15,000 with one or two solvent sureties to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Pune. The applicant shall not interfere with the prosecution witnesses.

Law Points

  • Suspension of sentence pending appeal
  • short term imprisonment
  • pendency of cases
  • bail conditions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (10) 58

Criminal Application No. 1418 of 2017 in Criminal Appeal No. 856 of 2017

2017-10-11

Smt. Anuja Prabhudesai, J.

Mr. Pravin Dabke, I/b Vikas Shivarkar, Advocate for the Applicant; Mrs. M. R. Tidke, APP for the Respondent/State

Mr. Yogesh Subhash Sanap

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application for suspension of sentence pending appeal

Remedy Sought

Suspension of execution of sentence and release on bail pending disposal of appeal

Filing Reason

Applicant convicted and sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment; appeal not likely to be heard soon due to pendency

Previous Decisions

Conviction and sentence by Special Judge, Pune in Special (Child) Sessions Case No. 334 of 2014 on 8th September, 2017

Issues

Whether the execution of sentence should be suspended pending appeal when the sentence is short and the appeal is not likely to be heard soon due to pendency.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that the sentence is short and the appeal will not be heard for years, so rejection would cause him to undergo sentence before merits hearing. State opposed the application.

Ratio Decidendi

When a convict is sentenced to a short term of imprisonment and the appeal is not likely to be heard for a considerable period due to pendency of cases, the execution of sentence should be suspended pending appeal to prevent the convict from undergoing the sentence before the appeal is heard on merits.

Judgment Excerpts

The records reveal that the applicant has been sentenced to undergo short term imprisonment of One year. The appeal is of the year 2017 and is not likely to come up for final hearing in the next couple of years due to large pendency of old cases. Hence, rejection of the application will result in the applicant undergoing the sentence of imprisonment even before the appeal is heard on merits.

Procedural History

The applicant was convicted and sentenced by the Special Judge, Pune on 8th September, 2017 in Special (Child) Sessions Case No. 334 of 2014. He filed Criminal Appeal No. 856 of 2017 and the present Criminal Application No. 1418 of 2017 for suspension of sentence pending appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 354
  • Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO): 8
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Suspends Sentence of Convict in POCSO Case Pending Appeal Due to Short Term and Pendency. The court suspended the execution of one-year rigorous imprisonment under Section 354 IPC and Section 8 POCSO Act, 2012, pending appeal, citin...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Landowner's Appeal for Enhanced Compensation and Allows State's Appeal Restoring Original Award. Market Value of Land Acquired for Fire Station Determined at Rs.70 per sqm Based on Comparable Sales and Developmen...