Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Invalidated Scheduled Tribe Certificate for 'Arakh' Community — Committee Failed to Consider Documentary Evidence. Scrutiny Committee's Order Set Aside for Non-Consideration of Documents and Incorrect Application of Socio-Cultural Affinity Test.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 32
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sudhakar s/o Rajaram Tumram, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 31.05.2004 passed by the Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims, Amravati, which invalidated his caste certificate issued on 21.12.1988 certifying him as belonging to the 'Arakh' Scheduled Tribe. The petitioner, a project affected person, was appointed as Junior Assistant in Zill Parishad, Amravati and was working in Panchayat Samiti at Morshi. He claimed to belong to the 'Arakh' community, notified as a Scheduled Tribe at Sr. No.18 in the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950 for Maharashtra. In support of his claim, he submitted seven documents before the Scrutiny Committee. However, the Committee passed the order invalidating his tribe claim without considering those documents, mainly on the ground that the petitioner failed to establish socio-cultural affinity and ethnic linkage with 'Arakh' subtribe of 'Gond' Scheduled Tribe. The Committee also observed that 'Arakh' has not been listed as an independent single entry but is clubbed with synonyms and subtribes. The High Court, after hearing the Assistant Government Pleader for respondent no.1 (no one appeared for the petitioner), found that the Committee had not considered the documents submitted by the petitioner. The Court held that the Committee's order was unsustainable as it failed to examine the documentary evidence. The Court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter back to the Scrutiny Committee for fresh consideration, directing the Committee to consider all the documents produced by the petitioner and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Scheduled Tribes - Caste Scrutiny - Validity of Tribe Certificate - The Scrutiny Committee must consider all documents produced by the claimant and cannot reject the claim solely on the ground of lack of socio-cultural affinity without examining the documentary evidence. The Committee's order was set aside for non-consideration of documents. (Paras 1-2)

B) Scheduled Tribes - 'Arakh' Community - Entry in Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950 - 'Arakh' is listed as a Scheduled Tribe at Sr. No.18 in relation to Maharashtra, and the Committee's observation that it is not an independent entry is erroneous. The Committee must verify the claim based on the notified entry. (Para 2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Scrutiny Committee's order invalidating the petitioner's Scheduled Tribe certificate as 'Arakh' was legally sustainable when it failed to consider the documents submitted by the petitioner and applied an incorrect standard of proof.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 31.05.2004 passed by the Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims, Amravati, is quashed and set aside. The matter is remitted back to the Scrutiny Committee for fresh consideration. The Committee shall consider all the documents produced by the petitioner and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Caste Scrutiny Committee must consider all documentary evidence
  • socio-cultural affinity and ethnic linkage test must be applied correctly
  • burden of proof on claimant
  • presumption in favour of validity of pre-existing certificates
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (07) 221

Writ Petition No. 2647/2004

2017-07-21

R.K. Deshpande, Mrs. Swapna Joshi

None present for petitioner; Mr. N.S. Rao, Assistant Govt. Pleader for respondent no.1

Sudhakar s/o Rajaram Tumram

The Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims, Amravati; The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Morshi, Dist. Amravati

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's Scheduled Tribe certificate.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the Scrutiny Committee's order dated 31.05.2004 and restoration of his caste certificate.

Filing Reason

The Scrutiny Committee invalidated the petitioner's caste certificate without considering the documents submitted by him.

Previous Decisions

The caste certificate was issued by the competent authority on 21.12.1988. The Scrutiny Committee invalidated it on 31.05.2004.

Issues

Whether the Scrutiny Committee's order invalidating the petitioner's Scheduled Tribe certificate was legally sustainable when it failed to consider the documents submitted by the petitioner. Whether the Committee's observation that 'Arakh' is not an independent entry is correct.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Committee did not consider the seven documents submitted in support of his tribe claim. Respondent no.1 (through Assistant Govt. Pleader) supported the Committee's order.

Ratio Decidendi

The Scrutiny Committee must consider all documentary evidence produced by the claimant before passing an order invalidating the tribe claim. Failure to do so renders the order unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the decision of respondent no.1 Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims, Amravati, rendered on 31.05.2004, by which the caste certificate of the petitioner as belonging to ‘Arakh’ Scheduled Tribe, issued by the competent authority on 21.12.1988 has been invalidated. The petitioner submitted in support of his tribe claim, seven documents before the said Committee. However, the said Committee without considering those documents, passed the order invalidating the tribe claim of the petitioner mainly on the ground that the petitioner has failed to establish socio cultural affinity and ethnic linkage with ‘Arakh’ subtribe of ‘Gond’, Scheduled Tribe.

Procedural History

The petitioner obtained a caste certificate on 21.12.1988. His claim was referred to the Scrutiny Committee for verification. The Committee passed an order on 31.05.2004 invalidating the certificate. The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 2647/2004 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging that order. The High Court heard the matter on 21.07.2017 and allowed the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950: Sr. No.18
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Demolition of Unauthorized Terrace Construction in Cooperative Housing Society. Lease of Terrace by Member Without Society's Consent Invalid Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Invalidated Scheduled Tribe Certificate for 'Arakh' Community — Committee Failed to Consider Documentary Evidence. Scrutiny Committee's Order Set Aside for Non-Consideration of Documents and Incorrect A...