Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Minor Deceased — Compensation of Rs.79,500/- Upheld. Notional Income of Rs.15,000 per annum applied for a 6-year-old child under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166, but no enhancement allowed without cross-appeal.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by the National Insurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and order dated 11/11/2005 of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Wardha, in Claim Petition No. 79/1998, whereby the Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.79,500/- to the respondents (claimants) for the death of a 6-year-old child, Shailesh, in a motor vehicle accident. The accident occurred on 14/04/1995 when the deceased was standing by the side of the road and was hit by a truck bearing registration MP23B6244, driven rashly and negligently by respondent no.5 (driver) and owned by respondent no.6. The claimants, parents and siblings of the deceased, sought compensation of Rs.1,00,000/-. The insurance company contested the claim, but the Tribunal held them jointly and severally liable along with the owner and driver. In appeal, the insurance company argued that the compensation was excessive as there was no evidence of the child's income. The High Court noted that for a child of 6 years, in the absence of evidence, notional income should be taken as Rs.15,000/- per annum as per the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act. Applying a multiplier of 15 and deducting 1/3rd for personal expenses, the loss of dependency would be Rs.1,50,000/-. Adding Rs.5,000/- for funeral expenses, the total compensation would be Rs.1,55,000/-. However, since the claimants did not file any cross-appeal or cross-objections, the High Court declined to enhance the award and dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal's award of Rs.79,500/-.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation for Minor Child - Notional Income - The Tribunal awarded Rs.79,500/- for death of a 6-year-old child, but the High Court held that in absence of evidence of income, notional income of Rs.15,000/- per annum should be taken, applying multiplier of 15 and deducting 1/3rd for personal expenses, resulting in Rs.1,50,000/- as loss of dependency, plus Rs.5,000/- for funeral expenses, total Rs.1,55,000/-. However, since the claimants did not cross-appeal, the award was reduced to Rs.79,500/- as per the Tribunal's order. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal for the death of a 6-year-old child is excessive and requires reduction.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The judgment and order of the MACT, Wardha dated 11/11/2005 in Claim Petition No. 79/1998 is confirmed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Compensation for death of minor child
  • notional income
  • multiplier method
  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Section 166
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (07) 200

First Appeal No. 142/2006

2017-07-12

Dr. Smt. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, J.

Smt. S.P. Deshpande for appellant; None present for respondents

M/s. National Insurance Co. Ltd.

Bhagwan Rajaram Gawai and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in a claim petition for compensation for death of a minor child in a motor vehicle accident.

Remedy Sought

Insurance company sought reduction of compensation awarded by Tribunal.

Filing Reason

Insurance company challenged the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal as excessive.

Previous Decisions

MACT, Wardha awarded Rs.79,500/- in Claim Petition No. 79/1998 on 11/11/2005.

Issues

Whether the compensation of Rs.79,500/- awarded by the Tribunal for the death of a 6-year-old child is excessive and requires reduction.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant insurance company argued that the compensation is excessive as there was no evidence of income of the deceased child.

Ratio Decidendi

In the absence of evidence of income of a deceased minor child, notional income of Rs.15,000/- per annum should be taken for computing compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act. However, if the claimants have not challenged the award, the appellate court cannot enhance the compensation suo motu.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal is preferred by the insurance company which is held liable to pay compensation of Rs.79,500/- to respondent nos.1 to 4 herein, along with the owner and the driver of the offending vehicle, by the judgment and order dated 11/11/2005 by MACT, Wardha in Claim Petition No. 79/1998. In the absence of any evidence regarding the income of the deceased, the notional income of the deceased can be taken as Rs.15,000/- per annum.

Procedural History

Claim Petition No. 79/1998 filed before MACT, Wardha by respondents 1-4 (claimants) for compensation for death of minor Shailesh in accident on 14/04/1995. Tribunal awarded Rs.79,500/- on 11/11/2005. Insurance company filed First Appeal No. 142/2006 before Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, which was dismissed on 12/07/2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Minor Deceased — Compensation of Rs.79,500/- Upheld. Notional Income of Rs.15,000 per annum applied for a 6-year-old child under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 16...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Reduces Sentence for Appellant Convicted Under Section 304 Part-II IPC in Culpable Homicide Case -- Youth and Provocation Factors Lead to Sentence Modification While Conviction Upheld