Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Intent. Conviction under Section 307 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove intention to cause death beyond reasonable doubt.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 14
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Mahadeo Dhakne, was convicted under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for attempting to murder his wife, Sangitabai, by attacking her with a sickle. The trial court sentenced him to five years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine. The appellant appealed to the Bombay High Court. The prosecution alleged that on 14.10.2012, the appellant, under the influence of liquor, demanded Rs. 2 lakhs from his wife and, upon her refusal, attacked her with a sickle, causing injuries on her head and face. The High Court examined the evidence, including the testimonies of the victim, her son, and the medical officer. The court found material inconsistencies: the victim initially stated that the appellant was not present at the time of the incident, but later claimed he attacked her. The son's testimony also varied. The medical evidence showed injuries on the head, but the doctor opined that the injuries were not sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredient of intention to cause death under Section 307 IPC. The court also noted that the appellant had returned home after a long absence and was behaving normally, and the incident occurred in a domestic setting without premeditation. Consequently, the High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction, and acquitted the appellant, giving him the benefit of doubt.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Attempt to Murder - Section 307 IPC - Conviction set aside - The appellant was convicted for attempting to murder his wife by attacking her with a sickle on the head. The High Court found inconsistencies in the testimonies of prosecution witnesses, particularly regarding the presence of the appellant at the scene and the nature of the attack. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove the intention to cause death beyond reasonable doubt, and the injuries were not sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death. The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was acquitted. (Paras 1-15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 307 of IPC is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Conviction and sentence set aside. Appellant acquitted of the offence under Section 307 IPC. Fine, if paid, to be refunded.

Law Points

  • Section 307 IPC
  • attempt to murder
  • intention to cause death
  • injury on vital part
  • inconsistency in evidence
  • benefit of doubt
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (07) 32

Criminal Appeal No. 737 of 2016

2017-07-20

K.K. Sonawane

Mr. M.A. Tandale for Appellant, Mr. A.P. Basarkar for Respondent-State

Mahadeo s/o. Nivrutti Dhakne

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction under Section 307 IPC for attempt to murder.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal by setting aside the conviction and sentence.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambejogai in Sessions Case No. 53 of 2015 for attempt to murder his wife.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 307 IPC and sentenced to 5 years RI and fine of Rs. 1,000/-.

Issues

Whether the prosecution proved the intention to cause death under Section 307 IPC beyond reasonable doubt. Whether the evidence of prosecution witnesses is consistent and reliable.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence is inconsistent and the injuries were not sufficient to cause death. Respondent argued that the conviction is based on credible evidence and the injuries were on a vital part.

Ratio Decidendi

For conviction under Section 307 IPC, the prosecution must prove intention to cause death or knowledge that the act is likely to cause death. Inconsistent evidence and lack of proof of such intention lead to acquittal.

Judgment Excerpts

Being dissatisfied with the judgment and order of conviction under Section 307 of IPC... the appellant/convict preferred the present appeal. The prosecution failed to prove the intention to cause death beyond reasonable doubt.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambejogai in Sessions Case No. 53 of 2015 on 29.11.2016. He appealed to the Bombay High Court under Section 374 Cr.P.C. The High Court reserved judgment on 21.06.2017 and pronounced on 20.07.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 307
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.): 374
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Intent. Conviction under Section 307 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove intention to cause death beyond reasonable doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Deletion of Addition for Unexplained Cash Credit and Waiver of Interest Under Sections 234A and 234B of Income Tax Act, 1961. Assessee's Explanation of Gift from Husband Accepted as Satisfa...