Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Part, Sets Aside Interest Award in Loan Recovery Suit. No Agreement for Interest Existed Between Parties, Hence Interest Cannot Be Awarded Under Section 34 CPC or Interest Act.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 22
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants against a decree for recovery of money. The respondent/plaintiff had filed a suit for recovery of Rs.1,50,000/- alleging that the appellants/defendants, who were relatives, had induced him to take a loan from a co-operative society by mortgaging his house, promising to pay the monthly installments. The defendants paid about fifteen installments but later stopped. The plaintiff then filed a suit claiming the balance loan amount of Rs.1,44,050/- along with other amounts. The defendants in their written statement admitted taking a hand loan of Rs.80,000/- without interest and claimed a set-off of Rs.52,578/-. The trial court decreed the suit for Rs.1,44,050/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization. The first appellate court confirmed the decree. In second appeal, the sole substantial question of law was whether the court could have awarded interest on the principal amount. The High Court examined the evidence and found that there was no agreement between the parties regarding payment of interest. The plaintiff's own case was that the loan was taken without interest. The court held that in the absence of an agreement or statutory provision, interest could not be awarded. The court relied on the principle that interest is payable only if there is a contract or usage of trade or a statutory provision. The court set aside the award of interest but maintained the principal amount of Rs.1,44,050/-. The appeal was partly allowed.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Interest on Principal Amount - Section 34 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The Court held that interest on the principal amount cannot be awarded in the absence of an agreement between the parties or a statutory provision entitling the plaintiff to interest. The trial court and first appellate court had erred in awarding interest on the principal amount of Rs.1,44,050/- without any basis. The substantial question of law was answered in the negative, and the interest component was set aside. (Paras 1-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Court could have awarded interest on the principal amount in a suit for recovery of loan without any agreement for payment of interest?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is partly allowed. The decree passed by the courts below is modified by setting aside the award of interest on the principal amount of Rs.1,44,050/-. The rest of the decree is maintained. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Interest on principal amount cannot be awarded without agreement or statutory provision
  • Section 34 CPC applies to decrees for money
  • Interest Act 1978 governs interest in absence of contract
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (06) 219

Second Appeal No. 382 of 2016

2017-06-30

A.S. Chandurkar

R. I. Agrawal for appellants, H. I. Kothari for respondent

Vikram son of Somaji Dhabale and Indubai wife of Vikram Dhabale

Bisan son of Ramaji Katgaye

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Second appeal against decree in suit for recovery of money

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought setting aside of decree awarding interest on principal amount

Filing Reason

Appellants challenged the award of interest on the principal amount of Rs.1,44,050/- by the trial court and first appellate court

Previous Decisions

Trial court decreed suit for Rs.1,44,050/- with interest at 6% per annum from date of suit till realization; first appellate court confirmed the decree

Issues

Whether the court could have awarded interest on the principal amount in the absence of an agreement or statutory provision?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that there was no agreement to pay interest and hence interest could not be awarded. Respondent argued that interest was rightly awarded under Section 34 CPC.

Ratio Decidendi

Interest on the principal amount cannot be awarded in the absence of an agreement between the parties or a statutory provision entitling the plaintiff to interest. Section 34 CPC applies only to decrees for money and does not create a substantive right to interest. The Interest Act, 1978 also requires an agreement or usage for payment of interest.

Judgment Excerpts

Whether the Court could have awarded interest on the principal amount? In the absence of any agreement between the parties to pay interest, the Courts below could not have awarded interest on the principal amount. The substantial question of law is answered in the negative.

Procedural History

The respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs.1,50,000/-. The trial court decreed the suit for Rs.1,44,050/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization. The first appellate court confirmed the decree. The appellants filed a second appeal in the High Court, which was admitted on the substantial question of law regarding award of interest.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 34
  • Interest Act, 1978:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Part, Sets Aside Interest Award in Loan Recovery Suit. No Agreement for Interest Existed Between Parties, Hence Interest Cannot Be Awarded Under Section 34 CPC or Interest Act.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC for Throwing Petrol Bottle into Fire Causing Death. The court held that the act was done with knowledge of likely death but without intention to cause death, reducing sentence to peri...