Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes FIR in Criminal Writ Petition Based on Compromise Between Parties — Offences Under Section 323 IPC and Section 8(2) of Goa Children's Act, 2003 Settled Amicably. The court held that when parties have settled the dispute and do not wish to proceed, continuing prosecution would be an abuse of process of law, warranting quashing under Section 482 CrPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 119
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Menino Camilo Fernandes, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of Crime No.183 of 2011 registered at Colva Police Station for offences punishable under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 8(2) of the Goa Children's Act, 2003. The petitioner was arraigned as an accused in the said crime. The dispute arose between the petitioner and the respondents no.2 and 3, Jose Dias and Jaison Dias. The petitioner had a son aged 17 years, while respondent no.2 had a son, respondent no.3, aged 20 years. The parties subsequently amicably settled their differences and mutually did not wish the criminal investigation or prosecution to proceed further. The petitioner therefore approached the High Court for quashing of the FIR and chargesheet. The High Court, after hearing the learned advocates for the parties and noting the compromise, held that since the parties had settled the matter and did not wish to continue with the proceedings, continuing the prosecution would be an abuse of the process of law. Accordingly, the court quashed the FIR and chargesheet in Crime No.183 of 2011 and disposed of the petition.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Quashing of FIR - Compromise - Section 482 CrPC - The petitioner sought quashing of FIR and chargesheet registered under Section 323 IPC and Section 8(2) of the Goa Children's Act, 2003, on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the dispute. The High Court, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC, quashed the FIR and chargesheet, holding that when the parties have settled the matter and do not wish to proceed, continuing the prosecution would be an abuse of process of law. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and chargesheet can be quashed on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties in a case involving offences under Section 323 IPC and Section 8(2) of the Goa Children's Act, 2003.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court quashed the FIR and chargesheet in Crime No.183 of 2011 registered with Colva Police Station and disposed of the criminal writ petition.

Law Points

  • Compromise in non-compoundable offences
  • Quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC
  • Inherent powers of High Court
  • Settlement between parties
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (05) 77

Criminal Writ Petition No.79 of 2017

2017-05-03

F. M. REIS, NUTAN D. SARDESSAI

Ms. M. Furtado, Shri P. Faldessai, Shri Pavithran A.V.

Menino Camilo Fernandes

The State of Goa, Jose Dias, Jaison Dias

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR and chargesheet.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of Crime No.183 of 2011 registered at Colva Police Station for offences under Section 323 IPC and Section 8(2) of the Goa Children's Act, 2003.

Filing Reason

The petitioner was arraigned as an accused and the parties had amicably settled the dispute, so the petitioner sought to quash the criminal proceedings.

Issues

Whether the FIR and chargesheet should be quashed on the basis of a compromise between the parties.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner submitted that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and did not wish the criminal investigation/prosecution to proceed further.

Ratio Decidendi

When the parties have amicably settled the dispute and do not wish to proceed with the criminal investigation or prosecution, continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law, and the High Court can exercise its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash the FIR and chargesheet.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner has taken exception to the Crime no.183 of 2011 registered with the Colva Police Station for the offence punishable under Section 323 IPC and under Section 8(2) of The Goa Children's Act,2003. The petitioner and the respondents no.2 and 3 have amicably settled the dispute and differences that arose between them and mutually did not wish that the criminal investigation / prosecution proceeded any further.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No.79 of 2017 before the High Court of Bombay at Goa seeking quashing of FIR and chargesheet in Crime No.183 of 2011. The court heard the parties and disposed of the petition on 3rd May 2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 323
  • Goa Children's Act, 2003: 8(2)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Sale Dispute Due to Lack of Consent from Co-Owner Under Portuguese Civil Code. Sale Deed executed by one co-owner without consent of other held voidable under Article 1119 of Family Laws.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging PST Rejection for Height Deficiency in CAPF Recruitment — Directs Re-measurement with Proper Procedure. The court held that rejection slips must be reasoned and candidates must be given a fair opp...