Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Quash FIR in Personal Dispute Case Due to Compromise. Criminal proceedings under Sections 323, 324, 506, 141, 143, 147 read with Section 149 IPC quashed as parties amicably settled the matter.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 49
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Salil Bandodkar, Sailee Bandodkar, and Saima Narvekar, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No.155/2016 registered at Porvorim Police Station, Goa. The FIR was lodged by respondent no.3, Bhanuk Hajuria, on 30 October 2016, alleging offences under Sections 323, 324, 506, 141, 143, 147 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The dispute arose from a scuffle between the petitioners and respondent no.3 along with his friends at PDA Colony, Porvorim. Subsequently, the parties arrived at a composite understanding and amicably resolved the dispute. The petitioners also filed a separate petition under Section 482 CrPC for quashing FIR No.154/2016, which was registered on a complaint by petitioner no.2 against respondent no.3 and others. The court considered the compromise and held that since the dispute was personal in nature and the parties had settled their differences, continuing the criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law. The court, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC, quashed FIR No.155/2016 to secure the ends of justice. The petition was allowed, and rule was made absolute.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Compromise in Non-Compoundable Offences - Petitioners sought quashing of FIR No.155/2016 registered for offences under Sections 323, 324, 506, 141, 143, 147 read with Section 149 IPC on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the dispute - Court held that since the dispute was personal and the parties had resolved their differences, continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process of law - Held that FIR can be quashed to secure ends of justice (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR registered for offences under Sections 323, 324, 506, 141, 143, 147 read with Section 149 IPC can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC on the basis of a compromise between the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. FIR No.155/2016 registered with Porvorim Police Station is quashed. Rule is made absolute.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC
  • Compromise in non-compoundable offences
  • Inherent powers of High Court
  • Settlement of personal disputes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (05) 100

Criminal Writ Petition No.81 of 2017

2017-05-04

F.M. Reis, Nutan D. Sardessai

2017:BHC-GOA:1314-DB

Shailesh Redkar, Mahesh Amonkar, V. Amonkar

Salil Bandodkar, Sailee Bandodkar, Saima Narvekar

State of Goa, Police Inspector Porvorim Police Station, Bhanuk Hajuria

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of FIR No.155/2016 registered against them.

Filing Reason

The FIR was registered based on a complaint by respondent no.3 regarding a scuffle; parties later settled the dispute amicably.

Issues

Whether the FIR can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC when the parties have compromised.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the dispute was personal and had been amicably resolved, and continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process. Respondents did not oppose the quashing in light of the compromise.

Ratio Decidendi

When the dispute is personal in nature and the parties have amicably settled their differences, continuing criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law, and the High Court can quash the FIR under Section 482 CrPC to secure the ends of justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners are taking exception to the FIR no.155/2016 dated 30.10.2016 registered with the respondent no.2 based on the complaint filed by the respondent no.3 for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 506, 141, 143, 147 read with Section 149 IPC. It was the petitioners' case further that the complaint filed by the respondent no.3 and the others and they had filed a separate petition before this Court invoking the powers of this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing the FIR No.154/2016.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Criminal Writ Petition No.81 of 2017 before the High Court of Bombay at Goa seeking quashing of FIR No.155/2016. The court heard the matter on 04/05/2017 and allowed the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 323, 324, 506, 141, 143, 147, 149
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Quash FIR in Personal Dispute Case Due to Compromise. Criminal proceedings under Sections 323, 324, 506, 141, 143, 147 read with Section 149 IPC quashed as parties amicably settled the matter.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order for Violation of Article 22(5) in Habeas Corpus Petition. Detenu's Right to Make Representation in Language Understood by Him Upheld, Detention Order Set Aside.