Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Milk Procurement Policy — Policy Held Valid Under Cooperative Societies Act. The court upheld the milk procurement policy of the Goa State Cooperative Milk Producers' Federation Ltd. as a reasonable restriction under Section 30 of the Goa Cooperative Societies Act, 2001, and not violative of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA
  • 11
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by 15 individual milk producers' cooperative societies and their chairmen against the Goa State Cooperative Milk Producers' Federation Ltd. and other state authorities. The petitioners challenged the milk procurement policy of the Federation, which allegedly restricted procurement to only certain societies, thereby affecting the petitioners' right to trade and their legitimate expectation to supply milk to the Federation. The court examined the provisions of the Goa Cooperative Societies Act, 2001, particularly Section 30, which empowers the Federation to regulate business among member societies. The court found that the policy was based on reasonable classification and was in public interest to ensure quality and efficiency in milk procurement. The court held that there was no violation of fundamental rights under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, as the right to trade is subject to reasonable restrictions. The doctrine of legitimate expectation was not applicable as there was no promise or past practice of procurement from all societies. The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the validity of the milk procurement policy.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Law - Milk Procurement Policy - Legitimate Expectation - The petitioners, being primary milk producers' cooperative societies, challenged the milk procurement policy of the respondent Federation which restricted procurement to certain societies. The court held that the policy was based on reasonable classification and did not violate any fundamental rights. The doctrine of legitimate expectation was not applicable as there was no promise or past practice. (Paras 1-10)

B) Constitutional Law - Right to Trade - Article 19(1)(g) - The court held that the right to trade is subject to reasonable restrictions. The milk procurement policy was a reasonable restriction imposed in public interest to ensure quality and efficiency. (Paras 11-15)

C) Cooperative Law - Section 30 of Goa Cooperative Societies Act, 2001 - The court interpreted Section 30 which deals with the powers of the Federation to regulate business among member societies. The policy was within the ambit of the Act. (Paras 16-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the milk procurement policy of the Goa State Cooperative Milk Producers' Federation Ltd. is arbitrary and violative of the rights of the petitioner societies under the Goa Cooperative Societies Act, 2001 and the Constitution of India.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the milk procurement policy of the respondent Federation as valid and not violative of any legal rights of the petitioners.

Law Points

  • Doctrine of legitimate expectation
  • Policy of milk procurement
  • Cooperative societies
  • Right to trade
  • Reasonable classification
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017:BHC-GOA:631-DB

WRIT PETITION NO.112 of 2017

2020-12-30

2017:BHC-GOA:631-DB

Mr. Aselmo Furtado & Ors.

The Goa State Cooperative Milk Producers' Federation Ltd. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the milk procurement policy of the respondent Federation.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners sought quashing of the milk procurement policy and direction to the Federation to procure milk from all member societies without discrimination.

Filing Reason

The petitioners alleged that the milk procurement policy of the Federation was arbitrary and discriminatory, affecting their right to trade and legitimate expectation.

Issues

Whether the milk procurement policy of the respondent Federation is arbitrary and violative of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution? Whether the petitioners have a legitimate expectation to supply milk to the Federation?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the policy was arbitrary and discriminatory, violating their right to trade under Article 19(1)(g). Respondents argued that the policy was based on reasonable classification and in public interest, within the powers under Section 30 of the Goa Cooperative Societies Act, 2001.

Ratio Decidendi

The milk procurement policy of the Federation is a reasonable restriction on the right to trade under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, and is within the powers conferred by Section 30 of the Goa Cooperative Societies Act, 2001. The doctrine of legitimate expectation does not apply as there was no promise or past practice.

Judgment Excerpts

The policy is based on reasonable classification and is in public interest. The right to trade under Article 19(1)(g) is subject to reasonable restrictions.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed in 2017 before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the milk procurement policy. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 30 December 2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Goa Cooperative Societies Act, 2001: Section 30
  • Constitution of India: Article 19(1)(g)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Milk Procurement Policy — Policy Held Valid Under Cooperative Societies Act. The court upheld the milk procurement policy of the Goa State Cooperative Milk Producers' Federation Ltd. as a...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Forest Land Dispute Due to Denial of Adequate Opportunity and Procedural Errors. The Court set aside lower court judgments and remanded the matter for fresh trial, emphasizing the need to admit additional survey...