Bombay High Court Directs State to Consider Remission for Convict in Golden Jubilee Case — Denial of Remission Based on Policy Not Applicable to Convicts Sentenced Before Policy Date.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 55
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Santosh Tulsiram Shitole, a convict lodged in Central Prison, Aurangabad, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the State Government for grant of State remission on account of 'Golden Jubilee of Indian Independence', as granted to similarly situated convicts. The petitioner was convicted in Crime No.186/1995 registered on 11th August, 1995. The court heard the matter and, with the consent of parties, disposed of the petition by directing the State to consider the petitioner's case for remission in accordance with the policy applicable at the time of his conviction. The court did not delve into the merits of the remission claim but directed the respondents to pass appropriate orders within a specified period.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Article 226 of Constitution of India - Remission of Sentence - Petitioner sought direction for grant of State remission on account of Golden Jubilee of Indian Independence - Court held that the petitioner is entitled to be considered for remission in accordance with the policy applicable at the time of his conviction, and directed the State to consider his case for remission (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner-convict is entitled to State remission on account of 'Golden Jubilee of Indian Independence' as granted to similarly situated convicts.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's case for grant of remission in accordance with the policy applicable at the time of his conviction and pass appropriate orders within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order.

Law Points

  • Remission of sentence
  • Golden Jubilee remission
  • Article 226 of Constitution of India
  • State remission policy
  • equal treatment of convicts
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (03) 75

Criminal Writ Petition No.1494 of 2016

2017-03-27

S.S. Shinde, K.K. Sonawane

Mr. G.D. Jain for Petitioner, Mr. S.Y. Mahajan, Addl. P.P. for Respondent/State

Santosh Tulsiram Shitole

The State of Maharashtra, The Police Superintendent, Central Prison, Aurangabad

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition seeking direction for grant of State remission on account of Golden Jubilee of Indian Independence.

Remedy Sought

Direction to the State Government to grant State remission on account of 'Golden Jubilee of Indian Independence' as granted to similarly situated convicts.

Filing Reason

The petitioner, a convict, claimed that he was entitled to remission on account of Golden Jubilee of Indian Independence, which was granted to similarly situated convicts.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to State remission on account of Golden Jubilee of Indian Independence?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he is entitled to remission as granted to similarly situated convicts. State's arguments not detailed in the judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court directed the State to consider the petitioner's case for remission in accordance with the policy applicable at the time of his conviction, implying that remission policies should be applied consistently to similarly situated convicts.

Judgment Excerpts

By way of filing this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks direction to the State Government for grant of State remission on account of 'Golden Jubilee of Indian Independence', as granted in favour of similarly situated convicts.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No.1494 of 2016 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad. The petition was heard on 20.03.2017 and judgment pronounced on 27.03.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs State to Consider Remission for Convict in Golden Jubilee Case — Denial of Remission Based on Policy Not Applicable to Convicts Sentenced Before Policy Date.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against 18-Year-Old Student Over Instagram Post on Environmental Concerns. Expression of environmental concerns on social media without malicious intent towards religion does not attract Section 295-A of IPC.