Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Absence of Instigation. Allegations of Harassment Not Sufficient to Attract Section 306 IPC as No Direct or Indirect Act of Abetment Was Disclosed.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 48
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Padmakar Ramdas Agresar, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 99 of 2016 registered at Ramanand Nagar Police Station, Jalgaon, for the offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The FIR was lodged by respondent No. 2, Ulhas Lakhichand Pachpol, alleging that the petitioner abetted the suicide of his wife (the sister of respondent No. 2). The petitioner contended that the allegations in the FIR did not disclose any act of instigation or abetment as required under Section 306 IPC. The State and respondent No. 2 opposed the petition. The court examined the FIR and the material on record and found that there was no allegation that the petitioner instigated, conspired, or intentionally aided the deceased to commit suicide. The court held that mere allegations of harassment or cruelty, without a direct nexus to the suicide, do not constitute abetment. Consequently, the court quashed the FIR, holding that the essential ingredients of the offence under Section 306 IPC were not made out. The petition was allowed, and the rule was made absolute.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Abetment of Suicide - Section 306 IPC - Quashing of FIR - The petitioner sought quashing of FIR registered for abetment of suicide of his wife. The court examined whether the allegations in the FIR and material on record disclosed any act of instigation or abetment. Held that mere allegations of harassment and cruelty without any direct or indirect act of instigation or intentional aid to commit suicide do not constitute abetment under Section 306 IPC. The FIR was quashed as the essential ingredients of the offence were not made out. (Paras 1-10)

B) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Inherent Powers - The court considered the scope of its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash criminal proceedings. Held that where the allegations in the FIR do not disclose the commission of an offence, the High Court can exercise its inherent powers to prevent abuse of process of law. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR registered under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for abetment of suicide can be quashed when the allegations do not prima facie disclose any act of instigation or abetment by the accused.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The impugned FIR (Exhibit I) at Crime No. 99 of 2016 registered with Ramanand Nagar Police Station, Jalgaon for the offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code is quashed and set aside. Rule is made absolute.

Law Points

  • Abetment of suicide requires direct or indirect act of instigation
  • conspiracy
  • or intentional aid
  • mere harassment or cruelty without nexus to suicide does not attract Section 306 IPC
  • FIR can be quashed if allegations do not disclose essential ingredients of offence.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (03) 74

Criminal Writ Petition No. 1296 of 2016

2017-03-02

S.S. Shinde, K.K. Sonawane

Mr. N.B. Suryawanshi for Petitioner, Mr. S.B. Yawalkar APP for Respondent No.1/State, Mr. G.A. Nagori for Respondent No.2

Padmakar Ramdas Agresar

State of Maharashtra and Ulhas Lakhichand Pachpol

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No. 99 of 2016 registered at Ramanand Nagar Police Station, Jalgaon for offence under Section 306 IPC.

Filing Reason

The petitioner alleged that the FIR did not disclose any act of instigation or abetment to commit suicide, and the continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.

Issues

Whether the FIR under Section 306 IPC can be quashed when allegations do not disclose any act of instigation or abetment.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the FIR does not disclose any act of instigation or abetment as required under Section 306 IPC. Respondents opposed the petition, contending that the allegations prima facie disclose the offence.

Ratio Decidendi

For an offence under Section 306 IPC, there must be a direct or indirect act of instigation, conspiracy, or intentional aid to commit suicide. Mere allegations of harassment or cruelty, without any nexus to the suicide, do not constitute abetment. The High Court can exercise its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash an FIR if the allegations do not disclose the commission of an offence.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, and heard finally with the consent of the parties. This Petition is filed with the following prayer: b) Quash and set aside impugned FIR (Exhibit I) at Crime No.99 of 2016 registered with Ramanand Nagar Police Station Jalgaon for the offence punishable under section 306 of the Indian Penal Code

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 CrPC before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking quashing of FIR No. 99 of 2016. The petition was heard and finally disposed of on 02.03.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 306
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Absence of Instigation. Allegations of Harassment Not Sufficient to Attract Section 306 IPC as No Direct or Indirect Act of Abetment Was Disclosed.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Setting Aside of Sarpanch Election Due to Procedural Violation. Election by show of hands after demand for secret ballot under Rule 10 of Bombay Village Panchayats (Sarpanch and Upsarpanch) Election Ru...