Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 307 IPC for Attempted Murder — Assault with Sharp Weapon on Intervener Constitutes Attempt to Cause Death. The court held that stabbing the victim in the stomach with a knife and assaulting with a sword clearly indicates an attempt to cause death, and the conviction under Section 307 IPC is sustainable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The revision petitioners, accused nos.1 to 3, were convicted by the learned Adhoc Assistant Sessions Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court, Greater Bombay, Mumbai, on 18th October 2011, for the offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 4 years each and fine of Rs.1,000/- each, in default, to undergo further simple imprisonment for 1 month. Their appeal before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court, Greater Bombay, Mumbai, in Criminal Appeal No.636 of 2011 was dismissed on 23rd November 2016. Aggrieved, they filed the present criminal revision application. The incident occurred on 21st May 2008 at about 9.30 p.m. in the vicinity of Mehek General Stores, Anna Nagar, Dharavi. The prosecution case was that accused no.1 Amir Shaikh saw PW3 Hamid talking with Shehanaz, daughter of accused no.3 Najir Shaikh. He questioned and assaulted Hamid. Then accused no.3 Najir Shaikh came holding a knife and started beating Hamid. PW2 Dastgir Shaikh intervened to pacify the quarrel. Infuriated by this intervention, the accused persons assaulted Dastgir Shaikh with sharp-edged weapons. Accused no.3 Najir Shaikh assaulted PW2 Dastgir with a knife, the blow landing on his stomach. Accused no.1 Amir Shaikh assaulted him with a sword. The court considered the evidence and arguments. The revision petitioners contended that the conviction was not sustainable as the injuries were not on a vital part and there was no intention to cause death. The State supported the conviction. The court analyzed the nature of the assault, the weapons used (knife and sword), and the location of the injury (stomach). The court held that the act of stabbing the victim in the stomach with a knife and assaulting with a sword clearly indicates an attempt to cause death. The conviction under Section 307 IPC was upheld. The court found no merit in the revision and dismissed it, confirming the sentence of 4 years rigorous imprisonment.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Attempt to Murder - Section 307 IPC - Conviction - Assault with knife and sword on intervenor causing stomach injury - Held that the act of accused no.3 stabbing the victim in the stomach with a knife and accused no.1 assaulting with a sword, coupled with the nature of injuries, clearly indicates an attempt to cause death, and the conviction under Section 307 IPC is sustainable (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the revision petitioners under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for attempting to murder PW2 Dastgir Shaikh by assaulting him with a knife and sword is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The revision application is dismissed. The conviction and sentence of the revision petitioners under Section 307 IPC are upheld.

Law Points

  • Attempt to murder
  • Section 307 IPC
  • conviction upheld
  • sharp weapon assault
  • stomach injury
  • intervention in quarrel
  • common intention
  • sentence of 4 years rigorous imprisonment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (02) 57

Criminal Revision Application No.692 of 2016 with Criminal Application No.738 of 2016

2017-02-23

A. M. Badar, J.

Mr. P.V. Vare for the Applicant, Mr. P.H. GaikwadPatil, APP for the Respondent State

Amir Nanhejan Shaikh and Ors.

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal revision application challenging conviction and sentence under Section 307 IPC.

Remedy Sought

The revision petitioners (accused nos.1 to 3) sought to set aside the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the trial court and confirmed by the appellate court.

Filing Reason

The revision petitioners were convicted for attempting to murder PW2 Dastgir Shaikh by assaulting him with a knife and sword.

Previous Decisions

The trial court convicted the accused on 18th October 2011, sentencing them to 4 years rigorous imprisonment and fine. The appellate court dismissed their appeal on 23rd November 2016.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 307 IPC is sustainable based on the evidence of assault with knife and sword causing stomach injury.

Submissions/Arguments

The revision petitioners argued that the conviction is not sustainable as the injuries were not on a vital part and there was no intention to cause death. The State supported the conviction, arguing that the nature of the assault and weapons used clearly indicate an attempt to cause death.

Ratio Decidendi

The act of stabbing the victim in the stomach with a knife and assaulting with a sword, given the nature of the weapons and the location of the injury, clearly indicates an attempt to cause death, and the conviction under Section 307 IPC is sustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

By this revision petition, revision petitioner / accused nos.1 to 3 are challenging the judgment and order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court, Greater Bombay, Mumbai, on 23rd November 2016, passed in Criminal Appeal No.636 of 2011 thereby dismissing the appeal filed by them and confirming the judgment and order passed by the learned Adhoc Assistant Sessions Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court, Greater Bombay, Mumbai, on 18th October 2011, thereby convicting them of the offence punishable under Section 307 of the IPC and sentencing them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 4 years each and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/ each, in default, to undergo further simple imprisonment for 1 month, by each of them.

Procedural History

The trial court convicted the accused on 18th October 2011. The accused appealed to the Sessions Court, which dismissed the appeal on 23rd November 2016. The accused then filed the present criminal revision application before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 307
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 307 IPC for Attempted Murder — Assault with Sharp Weapon on Intervener Constitutes Attempt to Cause Death. The court held that stabbing the victim in the stomach with a knife and assaulting with a ...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Second Appeals in Rent Fixation Cases, Remands for Fresh Consideration. Court Holds That Appellate Court Erred in Dismissing Appeals Without Merits Under Section 11(3) of Bombay Rent Act.