Bombay High Court Quashes Reservation for OBC (Woman) in Masrul Constituency for 2017 Elections Due to Violation of Rotation Principle. Court holds that Instruction No. 5.1 of State Election Commission requiring consideration of previous three elections must be followed over Rule 6 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samitis Rules, 1996 which only considers immediate previous election.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shri Raju s/o Fakirba Muley, filed a writ petition challenging the reservation of the Masrul constituency for Other Backward Class (Woman) for the 2017 elections. The petitioner contended that in the last four elections, the Masrul constituency had been reserved for women in 2002 and 2007, and again in 2017, while other constituencies like Dongaon, Pimpalgaon Kale, and Chandurbiswa had only one reservation for women. The petitioner relied on Instruction No. 5.1 of the State Election Commission dated 18.08.2016, which mandates consideration of the previous three elections for rotation. The respondents argued that Rule 6 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samitis (Manner and Rotation of Reservation of Seats) Rules, 1996 only requires consideration of the immediate previous election. The court examined the facts and found that Masrul had been reserved for women in 2002 and 2007, and in 2012 it was reserved for Scheduled Tribe. The court held that Instruction No. 5.1, which considers the previous three elections, must be followed to ensure proper rotation. Since Masrul had already been reserved for women twice in the last three elections, the reservation for 2017 was unsustainable. The court quashed the reservation and directed the respondents to reconsider the reservation in accordance with the instructions.

Headnote

A) Local Government - Reservation Rotation - Consideration of Previous Elections - Instruction No. 5.1 of State Election Commission vs. Rule 6 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samitis (Manner and Rotation of Reservation of Seats) Rules, 1996 - The court considered whether reservation for women in Masrul constituency for 2017 elections was valid. The petitioner argued that reservation had been provided in Masrul in 2002 and 2007, and again in 2017, while other constituencies had only one reservation in the last four elections. The court held that Instruction No. 5.1, which requires consideration of previous three elections, must be followed, and the reservation in Masrul was unsustainable as it violated the rotation principle. (Paras 2-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reservation of the Masrul constituency for Other Backward Class (Woman) for the 2017 elections is valid, considering the principle of rotation and the instructions of the State Election Commission.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the reservation of Masrul constituency for Other Backward Class (Woman) for the 2017 elections and directed the respondents to reconsider the reservation in accordance with Instruction No. 5.1 of the State Election Commission.

Law Points

  • Reservation rotation
  • consideration of previous three elections
  • interpretation of statutory rules vs. executive instructions
  • Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samitis (Manner and Rotation of Reservation of Seats) Rules
  • 1996
  • Rule 6
  • State Election Commission Instructions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (01) 124

WRIT PETITION NO. 6987 OF 2016

2017-01-23

B.P. Dharmadhikari, Mrs. Swapna Joshi

Shri A.S. Kilor for petitioner, Shri P. Tembhare, AGP for respondents

Shri Raju s/o Fakirba Muley

The Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati; The Collector, Buldhana

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging reservation of constituency for OBC (Woman) in 2017 elections.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of reservation of Masrul constituency for Other Backward Class (Woman) for 2017 elections.

Filing Reason

Petitioner alleged that reservation was fastened on Masrul constituency in violation of rotation principle as it had been reserved for women in 2002 and 2007, while other constituencies had only one reservation.

Issues

Whether the reservation of Masrul constituency for OBC (Woman) for 2017 elections is valid under the rotation principle. Whether Instruction No. 5.1 of State Election Commission or Rule 6 of the Rules should be followed for rotation.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: Reservation in Masrul in 2002, 2007, and again in 2017 violates rotation; other constituencies had only one reservation; Instruction No. 5.1 requires consideration of previous three elections. Respondents: Rule 6 only requires consideration of immediate previous election; rotation has been correctly followed.

Ratio Decidendi

Instruction No. 5.1 of the State Election Commission, which requires consideration of previous three elections for rotation, must be followed over Rule 6 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samitis (Manner and Rotation of Reservation of Seats) Rules, 1996, which only considers the immediate previous election. Since Masrul had been reserved for women in 2002 and 2007, the reservation for 2017 was unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

Instruction No. 5.1 of Election Commission stipulates consideration of previous three elections and reservations therein for working of rotation in 2017 Elections. Rule 6 mentioned supra states that while providing the reservation for women, the Electoral division where seats were reserved for such caste, Tribes or Class need to be put up for drawing of lots initially.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench challenging the reservation of Masrul constituency for OBC (Woman) for the 2017 elections. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 23 January 2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samitis (Manner and Rotation of Reservation of Seats) Rules, 1996: Rule 6
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Reservation for OBC (Woman) in Masrul Constituency for 2017 Elections Due to Violation of Rotation Principle. Court holds that Instruction No. 5.1 of State Election Commission requiring consideration of previous three electi...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Recovery Proceedings Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act — Cooperative Bank's Recovery of Loan Dues Upheld Against Borrowers and Guarantors. Alternative Remedy of Arbitration Under Secti...