Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Dismissal Application in Commercial Suit — Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act Not Mandatory for Suits Filed Before 20.08.2022. The court held that the cut-off date fixed by the Supreme Court in Patil Automation applies, and the plaint filed on 11.01.2021 cannot be rejected for non-compliance with Section 12-A.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 19
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The civil revision petition was filed by M/s. P.A.Sea Impex, the defendant in a commercial suit, challenging the order of the Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai, which dismissed their application for rejection of the plaint. The respondent, M/s. Fumigation Services Private Limited, had filed a suit on 11.01.2021 before the Commercial Court seeking recovery of Rs.17,38,348/- with interest at 18% per annum. The petitioner-defendant filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC read with Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, seeking rejection of the plaint on the ground that the plaintiff had not undergone mandatory pre-institution mediation as required under Section 12-A. The Commercial Court dismissed the application, leading to the present revision. The petitioner argued that Section 12-A is mandatory and relied on the Supreme Court's decision in M/s. Patil Automation Private Limited v. Rakheja Engineers Private Limited, which declared Section 12-A mandatory but made the declaration effective from 20.08.2022. The petitioner contended that the cut-off date is subject to three exceptions recognized in Patil Automation and that the Madras High Court in Arvind Gupta v. Punjab National Bank had already declared Section 12-A mandatory, so the plaint should be rejected even if filed before 20.08.2022. The High Court examined the Patil Automation judgment and noted that the Supreme Court explicitly made the declaration effective from 20.08.2022, with three exceptions: (i) plaints already rejected and not reopened, (ii) cases where the defendant has filed written statement and participated in trial, and (iii) cases where issues have been framed. The court found that the suit was filed on 11.01.2021, well before the cut-off date, and none of the exceptions applied. The court held that the Patil Automation judgment is binding and the cut-off date must be respected. The High Court also noted that the Arvind Gupta judgment was rendered before Patil Automation and cannot override the Supreme Court's declaration. Consequently, the court dismissed the civil revision petition, upholding the Commercial Court's order and confirming that the plaint is not liable to be rejected for non-compliance with Section 12-A.

Headnote

A) Commercial Law - Pre-Institution Mediation - Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 - Mandatory Nature - Cut-off Date - The Supreme Court in Patil Automation declared Section 12-A mandatory but made the declaration effective from 20.08.2022. The court held that suits filed before that date are not liable to be rejected for non-compliance, subject to three exceptions: (i) plaints already rejected and not reopened, (ii) cases where the defendant has already filed written statement and participated in trial, and (iii) cases where the court has already framed issues. The present suit was filed on 11.01.2021, before the cut-off date, and none of the exceptions applied. Hence, the plaint cannot be rejected. (Paras 4-6)

B) Commercial Law - Pre-Institution Mediation - Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 - Binding Precedent - High Court Judgment - The petitioner relied on a judgment of the Madras High Court in Arvind Gupta v. Punjab National Bank, which declared Section 12-A mandatory. However, the Supreme Court in Patil Automation is the binding precedent and its cut-off date applies. The High Court judgment cannot override the Supreme Court's declaration. Therefore, the plaint filed before 20.08.2022 is not liable to be rejected. (Paras 3-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a plaint filed before 20.08.2022 can be rejected for non-compliance with mandatory pre-institution mediation under Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, in light of the cut-off date fixed in Patil Automation case and the exceptions thereto.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The civil revision petition is dismissed. The order of the Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai dated 04.11.2023 in I.A.No.3/2023 in COS No.1644/2022 is upheld. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Law Points

  • Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act is mandatory but declaration effective from 20.08.2022
  • exceptions to cut-off date not applicable
  • plaint filed before cut-off date not liable to be rejected
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:MHC:560

CRP No. 1064 of 2024 and CMP.No.5538 of 2024

2026-02-02

S. Sounthar

2026:MHC:560

P.V.Sanjeev for petitioner, M/s. S. Sadasharam for respondent

M/s. P.A.Sea Impex, Rep by its Proprietor, Mr S. Parthiban

M/s. Fumigation Services Private Limited, Rep by Assistant Manager, Mr D. Moses

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil revision petition against order dismissing application for rejection of plaint in a commercial suit for recovery of money.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought setting aside of the order dated 04.11.2023 in I.A.No.3/2023 in COS No.1644/2022 passed by the Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai, and rejection of the plaint.

Filing Reason

Petitioner contended that the respondent/plaintiff failed to undergo mandatory pre-institution mediation under Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act before filing the suit.

Previous Decisions

The Commercial Court dismissed the petitioner's application for rejection of plaint. The present revision is against that dismissal.

Issues

Whether the plaint filed before 20.08.2022 is liable to be rejected for non-compliance with Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act, given the cut-off date fixed in Patil Automation? Whether the exceptions to the cut-off date in Patil Automation apply to the present case?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that Section 12-A is mandatory and the cut-off date in Patil Automation is subject to three exceptions; the Madras High Court in Arvind Gupta had already declared Section 12-A mandatory, so the plaint should be rejected. Respondent argued that the suit was filed before 20.08.2022 and the cut-off date applies; none of the exceptions are attracted.

Ratio Decidendi

The declaration in Patil Automation that Section 12-A is mandatory is effective only from 20.08.2022. Suits filed before that date are not liable to be rejected for non-compliance with Section 12-A, unless one of the three exceptions recognized in Patil Automation applies. The present suit was filed on 11.01.2021, before the cut-off date, and none of the exceptions apply. Therefore, the plaint cannot be rejected.

Judgment Excerpts

We declare that Section 12A of the Act is mandatory and hold that any suit instituted violating the mandate of Section 12A must be visited with rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11. ... We, however, make this declaration effective from 20.08.2022 so that concerned stakeholders become sufficiently informed. In the case on hand, the suit was filed on 11.01.2021, much prior to the cut-off date fixed by the Hon'ble Apex Court. Therefore, the plaint is not liable to be rejected for non-compliance of Section 12-A of the Commercial Court Act.

Procedural History

The respondent filed a commercial suit (COS No.1644/2022) on 11.01.2021 before the Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai for recovery of money. The petitioner-defendant filed I.A.No.3/2023 seeking rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC read with Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act. The Commercial Court dismissed the application on 04.11.2023. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed the present civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Madras High Court, which was heard and dismissed on 02.02.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Commercial Courts Act, 2015: 12-A
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order VII Rule 11
  • Constitution of India: Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Dismissal Application in Commercial Suit — Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act Not Mandatory for Suits Filed Before 20.08.2022. The court held that t...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Contempt Petition Against State Officer in Gratuity Dispute. False Affidavit Allegation Fails as Court Finds No Willful Disobedience or Scandalizing Conduct Under Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.