Madras High Court Allows Transfer of PMLA Case to Principal Sessions Court Under Section 44(1)(c) of PMLA — Concurrent Jurisdiction of Special Court for CBI Cases and PMLA Special Court Examined. The court held that the PMLA Special Court is the appropriate forum for trial of PMLA offences, and the transfer is necessary to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Deputy Director of the Directorate of Enforcement (petitioner) filed a petition under Section 538 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 read with Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging an order dated 18.03.2025 passed by the XIII Additional Special Court for CBI Cases, Chennai. The impugned order had rejected the petitioner's application to transfer C.C.No.19 of 2014 (a PMLA case) pending before the Special Court for CBI cases to the Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai (Special Court for PMLA cases) under Section 44(1)(c) of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). The respondents are Dr. P. Vijayan and V. Anitha, who are facing trial before the Principal Sessions Court, Special Court for PMLA cases, for the offence under Section 3 of the PMLA punishable under Section 4. The first respondent is the Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBI, which had registered the predicate offence. The petitioner argued that the PMLA case should be tried by the PMLA Special Court to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and ensure effective trial, as the respondents were already facing trial before that court. The respondents opposed the transfer, contending that the Special Court for CBI cases had jurisdiction and that the transfer would cause inconvenience. The High Court analyzed the provisions of Section 44(1)(c) of the PMLA, which empowers the High Court to transfer cases from one Special Court to another. The court noted that the PMLA Special Court has exclusive jurisdiction over money laundering offences, and the trial of the PMLA case before the CBI Special Court would lead to parallel proceedings. The court held that the impugned order was erroneous and set it aside, allowing the transfer of C.C.No.19 of 2014 from the XIII Additional Special Court for CBI Cases, Chennai to the Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai (Special Court for PMLA cases). The court directed the transfer to be completed within four weeks.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Transfer of PMLA Case - Section 44(1)(c) of Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 - The High Court has power under Section 44(1)(c) of PMLA to transfer a case from one Special Court to another, and the power under Section 538 of BNSS read with Section 482 CrPC is also available. The court held that the PMLA Special Court is the appropriate forum for trial of PMLA offences, and the transfer is necessary to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and ensure effective trial. (Paras 1-19)

B) Criminal Procedure - Concurrent Jurisdiction - Section 44(1)(c) of PMLA, 2002 - The Special Court for CBI cases and the PMLA Special Court both have jurisdiction over the scheduled offence, but the PMLA Special Court has exclusive jurisdiction over the money laundering offence. The court held that the trial of the PMLA case should be before the PMLA Special Court, and the transfer under Section 44(1)(c) is justified. (Paras 10-15)

C) Criminal Procedure - Transfer of Case - Section 538 of BNSS, 2023 read with Section 482 CrPC, 1973 - The High Court can exercise its inherent powers to transfer a case to secure the ends of justice. The court held that the impugned order rejecting transfer was erroneous and set it aside. (Paras 16-19)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court can transfer a PMLA case pending before a Special Court for CBI cases to the Principal Sessions Judge (Special Court for PMLA cases) under Section 44(1)(c) of the PMLA, and whether the impugned order rejecting such transfer was correct.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order dated 18.03.2025, and directed the transfer of C.C.No.19 of 2014 from the XIII Additional Special Court for CBI Cases, Chennai to the Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai (Special Court for PMLA cases) under Section 44(1)(c) of the PMLA. The transfer was directed to be completed within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Section 44(1)(c) of PMLA
  • 2002 confers power on the High Court to transfer PMLA cases from one Special Court to another
  • Section 538 of BNSS read with Section 482 CrPC can be invoked for transfer
  • PMLA Special Court has exclusive jurisdiction over scheduled offences only when they are part of the same transaction as money laundering
  • Special Court under PMLA is not subordinate to Special Court for CBI cases
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:MHC:922

Crl.O.P.No.8776 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.No.5762 of 2025

2026-03-05

Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Chief Justice, G.Arul Murugan, J.

2026:MHC:922

Mr.Rajnish Pathiyil (Special Public Prosecutor for petitioner), Mr.B.Mohan (Special Public Prosecutor for CBI for R1), Mr.R.Sathish Kumar (for R2 and R3)

The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai Zonal Office

1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation, Anti Corruption Bureau, Chennai; 2. Dr.P.Vijayan; 3. V.Anitha

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal original petition challenging the order rejecting transfer of a PMLA case from Special Court for CBI cases to PMLA Special Court.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner (Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement) sought to set aside the order dated 18.03.2025 and transfer C.C.No.19 of 2014 from XIII Additional Special Court for CBI Cases, Chennai to Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai (Special Court for PMLA cases) under Section 44(1)(c) of PMLA.

Filing Reason

The petitioner sought transfer of the PMLA case to the PMLA Special Court to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and ensure effective trial, as the respondents were already facing trial before the PMLA Special Court.

Previous Decisions

The XIII Additional Special Court for CBI Cases, Chennai had rejected the transfer application vide order dated 18.03.2025 in Crl.MP.No.154 of 2025 in C.C.No.19 of 2014.

Issues

Whether the High Court can transfer a PMLA case from a Special Court for CBI cases to the PMLA Special Court under Section 44(1)(c) of the PMLA? Whether the impugned order rejecting the transfer was correct?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the PMLA case should be tried by the PMLA Special Court to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and ensure effective trial, as the respondents were already facing trial before that court. Respondents opposed the transfer, contending that the Special Court for CBI cases had jurisdiction and that the transfer would cause inconvenience.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court has power under Section 44(1)(c) of the PMLA to transfer a PMLA case from one Special Court to another. The PMLA Special Court is the appropriate forum for trial of PMLA offences, and transfer is necessary to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and ensure effective trial. The inherent powers under Section 538 of BNSS read with Section 482 CrPC also support such transfer.

Judgment Excerpts

Calling into question the correctness of the order dated 18.3.2025 passed by the XIII Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Chennai, the unsuccessful complainant has preferred this original petition. The petitioner herein is the investigating agency, which, inter alia, enforces the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [the PMLA]. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are facing trial before the Principal Sessions Court, Special Court for PMLA cases, for the offence under Section 3 of the PMLA, punishable under Section 4 of the PMLA.

Procedural History

The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement filed an application (Crl.MP.No.154 of 2025) before the XIII Additional Special Court for CBI Cases, Chennai seeking transfer of C.C.No.19 of 2014 to the Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai (Special Court for PMLA cases) under Section 44(1)(c) of PMLA. The Special Court rejected the application on 18.03.2025. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed the present criminal original petition under Section 538 of BNSS read with Section 482 CrPC before the Madras High Court, which was reserved on 21.11.2025 and delivered on 05.03.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002: Section 3, Section 4, Section 44(1)(c)
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: Section 538
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Transfer of PMLA Case to Principal Sessions Court Under Section 44(1)(c) of PMLA — Concurrent Jurisdiction of Special Court for CBI Cases and PMLA Special Court Examined. The court held that the PMLA Special Court is the ap...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement Order — Employee Abandoned Service by Taking Up Employment Abroad Without Intimation. Clause 13.4 of Certified Standing Orders Validly Invoked to Terminate Employment for Abando...