Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Encroachment Notice — No Right Established for Relief. Notice to Surrender Encroached Property Does Not Provide Cause for Writ Proceedings.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 24
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, K. Jayavelu, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court challenging a notice dated 24.11.2017 issued by the Block Development Officer, Kakkalur Panchayat, Thiruvallur District, asking him to surrender the encroached portion of the property. The petitioner sought to quash the notice and to consider his representation dated 27.11.2017 to the Revenue Divisional Officer and Tahsildar. During the pendency of the suit, the petitioner had also filed an application to the District Collector for providing alternate accommodation under a welfare scheme for landless poor people. The court observed that the notice itself provided no cause for institution of writ proceedings. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the application for alternate accommodation may be considered by the competent authority in accordance with the terms and conditions of the welfare scheme. However, the court held that as far as the present petition was concerned, the petitioner had not established any right for the authorities to consider the relief. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed with no costs. The court clarified that it was for the petitioner to pursue the application for alternate accommodation pending before the competent authority.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Maintainability - Notice to Surrender Encroached Property - The petitioner challenged a notice issued by the Block Development Officer asking him to surrender the encroached portion of the property. The court held that such a notice provides no cause for institution of writ proceedings and the petitioner has not established any right for the authorities to consider the relief. The writ petition was dismissed. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a writ petition is maintainable against a notice asking the petitioner to surrender encroached property without establishing any right.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ Petition dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Law Points

  • Writ petition not maintainable against notice to surrender encroached property
  • No right established for relief
  • Alternative remedy available
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (04) 121

WP No. 33359 of 2017

2026-04-02

S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender

Prof.M.Udhaya Bhanu for Petitioner; Dr.S.Suriya, Addl.G.P. for R1 to R5; Mr.K.Balasubramanian for R6

K. Jayavelu

The District Collector, Thiruvallur District; The District Revenue Officer (DRO) Thiruvallur District; The Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Thiruvallur District; The Tahsildar, Thiruvallur District; The Block Development Officer, Kakkalur Panchayat, Ikkadu, Thiruvallur District; Prabhu; Traffic Ramaswamy; Mr. Vijay Purushothaman

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging notice to surrender encroached property

Remedy Sought

Quashing of notice dated 24.11.2017 and consideration of representation for alternate accommodation

Filing Reason

Notice issued by Block Development Officer asking petitioner to surrender encroached portion of property

Issues

Whether the writ petition is maintainable against a notice to surrender encroached property without establishing any right

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel submitted that an application for alternate accommodation was pending before the District Collector and may be considered under welfare scheme

Ratio Decidendi

A notice to surrender encroached property does not provide cause for institution of writ proceedings; the petitioner must establish a right for relief.

Judgment Excerpts

The Writ Petition has been instituted challenging the notice issued by the Block Development Officer, Thiruvallur asking the petitioner to surrender the encroached portion of the property. Such notice would provide no cause for institution of writ proceedings. As far as the present petition is concerned, the petitioner has not established any right for the authorities to consider the relief.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed in 2017 challenging a notice dated 24.11.2017. During pendency, an application for alternate accommodation was made to the District Collector. The petition was dismissed on 02.04.2026.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Encroachment Notice — No Right Established for Relief. Notice to Surrender Encroached Property Does Not Provide Cause for Writ Proceedings.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Appellant's Censure Upheld: Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal on Grounds of Gross Negligence and Violation of Duty. Censure for failure to complete investigations upheld; Principles of natural justice not violated, and proper procedure followed under U...