Madras High Court Directs Removal of Encroachments on Public Road by Temple and Petitioner in Writ Petition for Public Nuisance. Court Orders Authorities to Remove All Encroachments Following Statutory Procedure Within Twelve Weeks, Finding Both Temple and Petitioner Had Encroached on Public Road.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 72
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M.Selvam, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court seeking a direction to respondents 1 to 4 (Commissioner of Oulgaret Municipality, District Collector, Director of Hindu Religious Institutions and Wakf, and Tahsildar) to remove the encroachment made by the 5th respondent (Arulmigu Muthumariamman Temple) on a public road in Chinna Kospalayam, Nellithoppu, Pondicherry, in Survey No.175N. The Tahsildar cum Executive Magistrate filed a counter affidavit stating that the temple had encroached upon the public road to an extent of 4.70 sq.m. (50.59 sq.ft) and that the petitioner himself had built an RCC house encroaching the road portion to an extent of 14.08 sq.m. (150 sq.ft). The court noted that both the temple and the petitioner had encroached upon public property. The court directed the authorities to remove all such encroachments by following the procedures under the relevant statute and rules, and to complete the exercise within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, and no costs were awarded.

Headnote

A) Public Nuisance - Encroachment on Public Road - Removal of Encroachment - The court considered a writ petition seeking removal of encroachment by a temple on a public road. The Tahsildar's counter affidavit revealed that the temple encroached 4.70 sq.m. and the petitioner also encroached 14.08 sq.m. on the public road. The court directed removal of all encroachments following statutory procedure within twelve weeks. Held that encroachments on public property must be removed irrespective of who the encroacher is (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the encroachments on the public road by the 5th respondent temple and the petitioner should be removed by the authorities.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the authorities to remove all encroachments (both by the temple and the petitioner) by following procedures under relevant statute and rules within twelve weeks. Writ petition disposed of. No costs.

Law Points

  • Encroachment on public road
  • Removal of encroachment
  • Duty of authorities to remove encroachments
  • Compliance with statutory procedure
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (04) 104

WP No. 41220 of 2025 and WMP No. 46175 of 2025

2026-04-09

S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender

Mr.K.S.Ilangovan for petitioner, Dr. K. Ramasamy (Addl.G.P.(Pondy)) for respondents 1 to 4, No appearance for respondent 5

M.Selvam

The Commissioner, Oulgaret Municipality; The District Collector; The Director, Department Of Hindu Religious Institutions And Wakf; The Tashildar; Arulmigu Muthumariamman Temple

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking removal of encroachment on public road.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents 1 to 4 to remove encroachment made by 5th respondent on public road.

Filing Reason

Alleged encroachment by the 5th respondent temple on public road beyond permitted limit.

Issues

Whether the encroachments on the public road should be removed by the authorities.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner sought removal of temple encroachment; counter affidavit revealed petitioner also encroached.

Ratio Decidendi

Encroachments on public property must be removed irrespective of who the encroacher is, and authorities must follow statutory procedure.

Judgment Excerpts

With reference to the relief sought for in the present writ petition, the Tahsildar cum Executive Magistrate, Taluk Office, Oulgaret, Puducherry, filed counter affidavit stating that the encroachments are identified to an extent of 4.70 sq.m. or 50.59 Sq.ft in the subject property. Further, the report reveals that the writ petitioner has built RCC house by encroaching the road portion to an extent of 14.08 Sq.mts or 150 Sq.ft approximately. Since the authorities identified the encroachment in the subject land as well as found that the petitioner has also encroached upon the public property, all such encroachments are directed to be removed by following the procedures under the relevant statute and rules.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed WP No. 41220 of 2025 seeking removal of encroachment. The Tahsildar filed a counter affidavit. The court disposed of the petition with directions.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Directs Removal of Encroachments on Public Road by Temple and Petitioner in Writ Petition for Public Nuisance. Court Orders Authorities to Remove All Encroachments Following Statutory Procedure Within Twelve Weeks, Finding Both Temp...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Pre-emption Suit — Letter Held to Constitute Waiver of Right of Pre-emption. Agreement among co-sharers to give preference in sale was waived by plaintiff's letter consenting to sale to stranger.