Madras High Court Directs Removal of Encroachment on Public Land in Coimbatore — Religious Activity Alleged as Cover for Encroachment. Revenue Authorities Confirmed Encroachment on Road and Public Land; Court Orders Enforcement Action Within Twelve Weeks.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 92
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, S. Anuradha, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the District Collector, Tahsildar, and Commissioner of Coimbatore Corporation to remove an encroachment allegedly in the name of religious activity at Survey No.295 in Senganur Village, Coimbatore Taluk, Coimbatore District. The respondents included the District Collector, Tahsildar, Commissioner, and a private individual, Babysutha R. The learned Additional Government Pleader, based on written instructions from the Tahsildar, Coimbatore (North), submitted that during a survey, revenue authorities identified encroachment on the road, i.e., a portion of land classified as public land had been encroached upon and some constructions were made. In view of this, the court directed respondents 2 and 3 (Tahsildar and Commissioner) to initiate enforcement action and remove the encroachments by following the procedure contemplated under the relevant statute and rules in force. The exercise was directed to be completed within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

Headnote

A) Public Law - Encroachment on Public Land - Mandamus - Removal of Encroachment - Petitioner sought direction to remove encroachment allegedly in the name of religious activity on public land - Revenue authorities confirmed encroachment on road and public land - Court directed respondents 2 and 3 to initiate enforcement action and remove encroachments following procedure under relevant statute within twelve weeks (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents should be directed to remove the alleged encroachment on public land at S.No.295 in Senganur Village, Coimbatore.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is disposed of directing respondents 2 and 3 to initiate enforcement action and remove the encroachments by following procedure under relevant statute and rules within twelve weeks from receipt of order. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.

Law Points

  • Encroachment on public land
  • Mandamus
  • Removal of encroachment
  • Procedure under relevant statute
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (04) 19

Writ Petition No.36806 of 2025

2026-04-29

S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender

Mr.S.Karthikei Balan (for petitioner), Mr.T.Arun Kumar (Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2), Mr.D.Ferdinand (Standing Counsel for R3), No appearance (R4)

S. Anuradha

The District Collector, Coimbatore; The Tahsildar, Coimbatore North; The Commissioner, Corporation of Coimbatore; Babysutha R.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus to remove encroachment on public land.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachment allegedly in the name of religious activity at S.No.295 in Senganur Village, Coimbatore Taluk, Coimbatore District.

Filing Reason

Alleged encroachment on public land under the guise of religious activity.

Issues

Whether the respondents should be directed to remove the alleged encroachment on public land.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner sought removal of encroachment. Additional Government Pleader submitted that revenue authorities identified encroachment on road and public land during survey.

Ratio Decidendi

Where revenue authorities confirm encroachment on public land, the court may direct removal of encroachment by following due procedure under relevant statute.

Judgment Excerpts

Learned Additional Government Pleader, based on the written instructions given by the Tahsildar, Coimbatore (North), would submit that during the course of survey, the revenue authorities identified encroachment on the road. the respondents 2 and 3 are directed to initiate enforcement action and remove the encroachments by following the procedure as contemplated under relevant Statute and Rules in force.

Procedural History

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Heard counsel. Order passed on 29-04-2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Directs Removal of Encroachment on Public Land in Coimbatore — Religious Activity Alleged as Cover for Encroachment. Revenue Authorities Confirmed Encroachment on Road and Public Land; Court Orders Enforcement Action Within Twelve...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Grabbing Proceedings Against Petitioners for Lack of Jurisdiction of Special Court — Land Grabbing Complaint Filed by Forest Officer Not Maintainable as Dispute Pertains to Private Land Not Notified as Governmen...