Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Negotiable Instruments Act Case Following Settlement — Conviction for Cheque Dishonour Set Aside as Complainant Received Full Compensation Amount.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant (accused) filed a Criminal Revision Application under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment and order of conviction dated 03.03.2017 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Himmatnagar, in Criminal Appeal No.49 of 2014, which upheld the conviction and sentence dated 07.06.2014 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Himmatnagar, in Criminal Case No.859 of 2011. The trial court had convicted the applicant for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and sentenced him to simple imprisonment of one year and directed payment of compensation of Rs.5,30,000/- to the complainant, with default sentence of three months. When the revision application was called out, the learned advocate for the applicant remained absent. The learned advocate for the respondent no.2 (complainant) appeared and submitted that the complainant had received the amount and the dispute was settled. The court noted that the applicant was not interested in proceeding with the matter. Considering the concurrent findings and the fact that the impugned amount had already been paid to the complainant, the court held that once the amount is deposited and the offence under Section 138 NI Act is compounded, the conviction and sentence can be set aside. The court allowed the revision application, quashed and set aside the judgments of the courts below, and acquitted the applicant of the offence under Section 138 NI Act. The court also directed that the amount deposited by the applicant, if any, be disbursed to the complainant.

Headnote

A) Negotiable Instruments Act - Dishonour of Cheque - Section 138 - Compounding of Offence - Settlement between parties - Where the complainant has received the entire cheque amount and the dispute is settled, the conviction and sentence under Section 138 NI Act can be set aside and the accused acquitted - Held that once the amount is paid and the offence is compounded, the revision application is allowed and the impugned judgments are quashed (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 can be set aside when the parties have settled the dispute and the complainant has received the cheque amount.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The revision application is allowed. The judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 03.03.2017 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Himmatnagar in Criminal Appeal No.49 of 2014, and the judgment and order dated 07.06.2014 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Himmatnagar in Criminal Case No.859 of 2011 are quashed and set aside. The applicant is acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The amount deposited by the applicant, if any, shall be disbursed to the complainant.

Law Points

  • Compounding of offence under Section 138 NI Act
  • Settlement between parties
  • Acquittal upon payment of cheque amount
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 578

R/Criminal Revision Application (Against Conviction - Negotiable Instrument Act) No. 265 of 2017

2026-03-23

Hasmukh D. Suthar

Hemang S Bharwad, Sahil B Trivedi, Mr. Rohan Raval, Shrikar H Bhatt

Govindbhai Bhulabhai Prajapati

State of Gujarat & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Revision Application against conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Remedy Sought

Quashing and setting aside the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the trial court and appellate court.

Filing Reason

The applicant was convicted for dishonour of cheque under Section 138 NI Act and sentenced to one year imprisonment and compensation of Rs.5,30,000/-.

Previous Decisions

The trial court convicted the applicant on 07.06.2014 in Criminal Case No.859 of 2011. The appellate court dismissed the appeal on 03.03.2017 in Criminal Appeal No.49 of 2014.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 can be set aside when the parties have settled the dispute and the complainant has received the cheque amount.

Submissions/Arguments

The learned advocate for the respondent no.2 (complainant) submitted that the complainant has received the amount and the dispute is settled. The applicant remained absent and was not interested in proceeding with the matter.

Ratio Decidendi

Once the amount under the cheque is paid to the complainant and the dispute is settled, the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 can be compounded, and the conviction and sentence can be set aside, leading to acquittal of the accused.

Judgment Excerpts

Learned Advocate Mr. Shrikar H. Bhatt, for the respondent no.2 – complainant appeared and submitted that the complainant has received the amount and dispute is settled. In view of above once the amount being deposited and as the offence under Section 138 of the NI Act is compounded, the conviction and sentence can be set aside.

Procedural History

The trial court convicted the applicant on 07.06.2014 in Criminal Case No.859 of 2011. The applicant appealed to the Sessions Court, which dismissed the appeal on 03.03.2017 in Criminal Appeal No.49 of 2014. The applicant then filed the present revision application before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 397, 401
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Negotiable Instruments Act Case Following Settlement — Conviction for Cheque Dishonour Set Aside as Complainant Received Full Compensation Amount.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support the prosecutio...