High Court of Gujarat Quashes Reassessment Notice and Proceedings Under Income Tax Act, 1961 as Notice Issued Beyond Surviving Time Limit. Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 for Assessment Year 2013-14 Held Invalid as It Was Issued After the Expiry of the Surviving Time Computed From Deemed Notice Date Under Section 148A(b).

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 13
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner assessee challenged the order under Section 148A(d) dated 20.07.2022 and the consequent reassessment notice under Section 148 dated 21.07.2022 for Assessment Year 2013-2014, contending it was time-barred. The original notice under Section 148 was issued on 10.06.2021 during the extended period provided by the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA). Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal, this notice was deemed a show-cause notice under Section 148A(b). The Assessing Officer supplied information on 26.05.2022, making the due date for reply 10.06.2022. No reply was filed, and the order under Section 148A(d) and the fresh notice under Section 148 were passed on 20.07.2022 and 21.07.2022 respectively. The petitioner argued that the reassessment notice was invalid as it was issued beyond the surviving time limit stipulated by the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal. The Revenue could not controvert the factual matrix. The Court, relying on its earlier decision in Dhanraj Govindram Kella, held that for Assessment Year 2013-2014, where the original notice was issued on 10.06.2021, the surviving time till 30.06.2021 was 20 days. Consequently, the last date for issuance of the reassessment notice under the new regime was 01.07.2022. Since the order under Section 148A(d) was passed on 20.07.2022, it was beyond the surviving period and thus time-barred. The Court quashed the impugned order and all consequential proceedings, holding them invalid and liable to be set aside in accordance with the dictum in Rajeev Bansal.

Headnote

A) Taxation - Reassessment Proceedings - Validity of Notice under Section 148 - Income Tax Act, 1961, Sections 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d); Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 - The Assessing Officer issued a notice under Section 148 on 10.06.2021 for AY 2013-14 during the extended period under TOLA, which was deemed a notice under Section 148A(b) per Ashish Agarwal. The surviving time from 10.06.2021 to 30.06.2021 was 20 days, so the last date for issuing notice under the new regime was 01.07.2022. The order under Section 148A(d) was passed on 20.07.2022, beyond this surviving period. Held, the notice and all consequential proceedings are invalid and quashed. (Paras 3-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2013-2014 was valid in view of the surviving time limit under the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 and the Supreme Court's directions in Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal and Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court quashed the order under Section 148A(d) dated 20.07.2022, the notice under Section 148 dated 21.07.2022, and all consequential reassessment proceedings as invalid and time-barred. The Court held that the notice was issued beyond the surviving time limit as mandated by the Supreme Court in Rajeev Bansal.

Law Points

  • Reassessment notice under Section 148 must be issued within the surviving time limit computed from the date of the deemed notice under Section 148A(b) to 30.06.2021. Notices issued beyond the surviving period are invalid and liable to be quashed.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 526

R/SCA/9019/2023

2026-03-23

A.S. Supehia, Pranav Trivedi

2026:GUJHC:21871-DB

Jaimin A. Gandhi, Viresh I. Rudalal, Karan G. Sanghani

Rameshchandra Ratilal Bordiwala, LHS of Late Ratilal Dahyabhai Chauhan

The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2)(1), Surat

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to the validity of reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, 1961 on grounds of limitation.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought quashing of the order under Section 148A(d) dated 20.07.2022, the notice under Section 148 dated 21.07.2022, and all consequential reassessment proceedings.

Filing Reason

The reassessment notice was issued beyond the surviving time limit as per the Supreme Court's directions in Ashish Agarwal and Rajeev Bansal, rendering it time-barred.

Previous Decisions

The original notice under Section 148 dated 10.06.2021 was deemed a notice under Section 148A(b) pursuant to the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal.

Issues

Whether the reassessment notice issued for Assessment Year 2013-2014 was valid in view of the surviving time limit under TOLA and the Supreme Court's directions in Ashish Agarwal and Rajeev Bansal.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the reassessment notice was time-barred as it was issued beyond the surviving time limit computed from the date of the deemed notice. The Revenue did not dispute the factual matrix and could not controvert the petitioner's contention regarding limitation.

Ratio Decidendi

A reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued pursuant to the Supreme Court's directions in Ashish Agarwal must be issued within the surviving time limit computed from the date of the deemed notice under Section 148A(b) to 30.06.2021. If the notice is issued beyond this surviving period, it is time-barred and invalid, and all consequential proceedings are liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

The Assessing Officers were required to issue the reassessment notice under section 148 of the new regime within the time limit surviving under the Income-tax Act read with the Taxation and other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020. All notices issued beyond the surviving period are time barred and liable to be set aside. In view of foregoing reasons, impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Act dated 20.07.2022 is hereby quashed and set aside and all consequential proceedings are also quashed and set aside.

Procedural History

The Assessing Officer issued a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 10.06.2021 for Assessment Year 2013-2014 during the extended period under TOLA. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal, this notice was treated as a notice under Section 148A(b). The Assessing Officer provided information on 26.05.2022. The assessee did not file any reply. The Assessing Officer passed an order under Section 148A(d) on 20.07.2022 and issued a fresh notice under Section 148 on 21.07.2022. The assessee filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging these proceedings on the ground of being time-barred.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d)
  • Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020: 3(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Gujarat Quashes Reassessment Notice as Time-Barred Under Income Tax Act. Notice Issued Beyond 'Surviving Time' Period Invalid as per Supreme Court Directives in Ashish Agarwal and Rajeev Bansal Cases.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Assessee in Income Tax Case Allowing Deduction of Expenses Incurred by Partner from Share of Firm's Profits. Partner's Expenditure to Earn Income from Registered Firms is Deductible Under Section 10(2) of Income-tax Act, 1922 De...