Gujarat High Court Directs Expeditious Disposal of Interim Injunction Application in Trademark Suit - Petitioner Sought Mandamus for Timely Adjudication of Exhibit-5 Application in TM Suit No. 2 of 2024

High Court: Gujarat High Court
  • 169
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Rupalben Mayurbhai Patel, filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat High Court, seeking a writ of mandamus or certiorari to direct the Learned Trial Court to expeditiously decide and dispose of the application below Exhibit-5 in TM Suit No. 2 of 2024, preferably within thirty days. The petitioner had originally filed the trademark suit on 14.08.2024 against the respondent, Husenali Anwarali Charaniya, seeking reliefs of injunction against the respondent for infringement of copyright and passing off of the trademark 'KANTI DADA'. The summons of the suit and the injunction application were served upon the defendant on 23.08.2024. Thereafter, the defendant moved an application under Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for staying of the suit. The petitioner contended that despite the suit being filed in August 2024, the interim injunction application remained pending due to the defendant's Section 10 application. The High Court heard learned advocate Ms. Rushvi Shah for the petitioner, while the respondent remained absent. The Court observed that the suit was filed in August 2024 and the interim application was pending for a considerable period. The Court directed the Trial Court to decide the application below Exhibit-5 in TM Suit No. 2 of 2024 within four weeks from the date of receipt of the order, and disposed of the petition accordingly. The Court also noted that the respondent had not filed any written statement and had only moved an application under Section 10 CPC.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Interim Injunction - Expeditious Disposal - The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to direct the Trial Court to decide the application below Exhibit-5 in TM Suit No. 2 of 2024 within thirty days, as the suit was filed in August 2024 and the interim application remained pending due to the defendant's application under Section 10 CPC for stay of the suit. The High Court, noting the delay, directed the Trial Court to decide the interim application within four weeks from the date of receipt of the order. (Paras 1-5)

B) Trademark Law - Infringement and Passing Off - Interim Relief - The petitioner filed a trademark suit seeking injunction against the respondent for infringement of copyright and passing off of the trademark 'KANTI DADA'. The summons and injunction application were served on the defendant on 23.08.2024, and the defendant moved an application under Section 10 CPC for stay of the suit. The High Court held that the interim application should be decided expeditiously and directed the Trial Court to dispose of it within four weeks. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court should direct the Trial Court to expeditiously dispose of the interim injunction application (Exhibit-5) in a trademark suit, given the delay caused by the defendant's application under Section 10 CPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court directed the Trial Court to decide the application below Exhibit-5 in TM Suit No. 2 of 2024 within four weeks from the date of receipt of the order. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

Law Points

  • Expeditious disposal of interim applications
  • Mandamus for timely adjudication
  • Trademark infringement and passing off
  • Section 10 CPC stay application
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 1117

R/Special Civil Application No. 3819 of 2026

2026-03-30

Devan M. Desai

2026:GUJHC:24144

Ms. Rushvi N. Shah, Mr. Zahid K. Shaikh, Mr. Arbaz A. Saiyed

Rupalben Mayurbhai Patel

Husenali Anwarali Charaniya

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil writ petition seeking direction for expeditious disposal of interim injunction application in a trademark suit.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus/certiorari directing the Trial Court to decide the application below Exhibit-5 in TM Suit No. 2 of 2024 within thirty days.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's interim injunction application in the trademark suit was pending due to the defendant's application under Section 10 CPC for stay of the suit.

Issues

Whether the High Court should direct the Trial Court to expeditiously dispose of the interim injunction application in a trademark suit.

Submissions/Arguments

Learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner filed Trademark Suit No. 02/2024 on 14.08.2024 seeking injunction against the respondent for infringement of copyright and passing off of trademark 'KANTI DADA'. The summons and injunction application were served on the defendant on 23.08.2024, and the defendant moved an application under Section 10 CPC for stay of the suit. The interim application remained pending.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court held that interim applications in pending suits should be decided expeditiously to avoid delay in justice, and directed the Trial Court to dispose of the interim injunction application within four weeks.

Judgment Excerpts

The present petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, by the petitioner - original plaintiff praying for following prayers:- Learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that the appellant had filed Trademark Suit No. 02/2024 against the respondent on 14.08.2024 seeking reliefs of injunction against the respondent for infringement of copyright and passing off of Trademark KANTI DADA. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Learned Trial Court to decide the application below Exhibit-5 in TM Suit No. 2 of 2024 within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Trademark Suit No. 02/2024 on 14.08.2024. Summons and injunction application were served on the defendant on 23.08.2024. The defendant moved an application under Section 10 CPC for stay of the suit. The petitioner then filed the present Special Civil Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction for expeditious disposal of the interim application.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India, 1950: Articles 226, 227
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC): Section 10
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Directs Expeditious Disposal of Interim Injunction Application in Trademark Suit - Petitioner Sought Mandamus for Timely Adjudication of Exhibit-5 Application in TM Suit No. 2 of 2024
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Directly Recruited Assistant Professors Seeking Stepping Up of Pay Based on Juniors' Pay. Rule 21 of Gujarat Civil Services (Pay) Rules, 2002 Not Applicable Where Anomaly Arises from Counting of Ad Hoc Services of J...