Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-2016 Due to Non-Compliance with Section 148A and Invalid Sanction. Notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 issued after 01.04.2021 must follow new procedure under Section 148A and obtain valid sanction under Section 151.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 65
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Nova Dye Stuff Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2015-2016. The notice was issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(1), Surat. The petitioner contended that the notice was issued without complying with the mandatory procedure under Section 148A(b) of the Act, which came into effect from 01.04.2021. The respondent relied on the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 (TOLA) to extend the time limit for issuance of notice up to 30.06.2021. However, the notice was actually issued on 26.05.2022 after the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal (2022) 444 ITR 1 (SC). The court noted that similar notices for Assessment Years 2013-2014 to 2017-2018 were challenged on grounds of delay and invalid sanction. The Gujarat High Court in Keenara Industries (P.) Ltd. v. ITO [2023] 147 taxmann.com 585 (Guj) had allowed such petitions. The matter was taken to the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal (2024) 469 ITR 46 (SC), which decided the issues regarding delay under Section 149 and validity of sanction under Section 151. Following the Supreme Court's decision, the High Court held that the notice under Section 148 was invalid as it did not comply with Section 148A procedure and the sanction under Section 151 was not granted by the competent authority. The court quashed the notice and allowed the petition.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Reassessment - Section 148, 148A, 149, 151, 155 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Validity of Notice - The petitioner challenged notice under Section 148 for AY 2015-2016 issued after 01.04.2021 without complying with Section 148A(b) procedure. The court held that the notice was invalid as it did not follow the mandatory procedure under Section 148A and the sanction under Section 151 was not granted by the competent authority. (Paras 1-6)

B) Income Tax - Sanction - Section 151 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Invalid Sanction - The court found that the sanction for issuance of notice under Section 148 was granted by an authority not competent under Section 151 as per the new regime. The sanction was held to be invalid, rendering the notice void. (Paras 5-6)

C) Income Tax - Time Limit - Section 149 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Delay - The notice was issued beyond the time limit prescribed under Section 149 as applicable after 01.04.2021. The court held that the extension under TOLA cannot validate a notice that is otherwise barred by limitation. (Paras 4-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2015-2016 is valid when it was issued without complying with Section 148A(b) and without proper sanction under Section 151 of the Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and quashed the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2015-2016.

Law Points

  • Reassessment notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act
  • 1961 issued after 01.04.2021 must comply with Section 148A procedure
  • Sanction under Section 151 must be granted by the specified authority
  • TOLA cannot override substantive provisions of the Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 467

R/Special Civil Application No. 5595 of 2023

2026-03-03

Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia, Honourable Mr. Justice Pranav Trivedi

Parimalsinh Parmar for the Petitioner, Karan G Sanghani for the Respondent

Nova Dye Stuff Industries Pvt. Limited

The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(1), Surat

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to reassessment notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961

Remedy Sought

Quashing of notice under Section 148 for Assessment Year 2015-2016

Filing Reason

Notice issued without complying with Section 148A(b) and without valid sanction under Section 151

Previous Decisions

Gujarat High Court in Keenara Industries allowed similar petitions; Supreme Court in Rajeev Bansal decided issues on delay and sanction

Issues

Whether the notice under Section 148 issued after 01.04.2021 is valid without complying with Section 148A procedure? Whether the sanction under Section 151 was granted by the competent authority? Whether the notice is barred by limitation under Section 149?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that notice was issued without complying with Section 148A(b) and without valid sanction. Respondent argued that TOLA extended time limit and notice was valid as per Ashish Agarwal decision.

Ratio Decidendi

A reassessment notice under Section 148 issued after 01.04.2021 must comply with the mandatory procedure under Section 148A and obtain valid sanction under Section 151 from the competent authority. Failure to do so renders the notice invalid.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner has challenged notices issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2015-2016 under the old regime by placing reliance on the provisions of the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020. It is the case of the petitioner that the said notice was issued without complying Section 148A(b) of the Act, as required to be issued with effect from 01.04.2021, under the new regime governing reopening provisions which had came into force. This Court in case of Keenara Industries (P.) Ltd vs. ITO reported in [2023] 147 taxamann.com 585 (Guj) allowed such petitions. The matter was carried to Hon’ble Apex Court wherein Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal reported in (2024) 469 ITR 46 (SC) decided the issues raised with regard to delay as per the provisions of section 149 of the Act which has come into operation after 01.04.2021 as well as validity of sanction granted under section 155 of the Act.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Special Civil Application No. 5595 of 2023 challenging the reassessment notice. Similar petitions for other assessment years were allowed by Gujarat High Court in Keenara Industries. The Supreme Court in Rajeev Bansal decided the issues on delay and sanction. The present petition was heard and decided on 03.03.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 148, 148A, 149, 151, 155
  • Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal, Holds Interest on Unrecognised Provident Fund Contributions Taxable Under Section 56 of Income-tax Act, 1961. High Court's Exemption under Section 17(3)(ii) Set Aside as Interest on Assessee's Own Contributions Co...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Development Case Due to Delay and Acquiescence. Petitioner Barred from Challenging Notification After Voluntarily Executing Relinquishment Deed Accepting Conditions, Constituting Estoppel and La...