Gujarat High Court Upholds Labour Court Award Granting Reinstatement Without Backwages in Industrial Dispute. Deletion of Workman's Name from Muster Roll Without Hearing Held Illegal, but Backwages Denied as Workman Failed to Prove Unemployment.

High Court: Gujarat High Court
  • 99
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner-workman, Jayantibhai Merubhai Patel, filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, challenging the judgment and award dated 18.06.2019 passed by the Labour Court, Ahmedabad in Reference (LCV) No. 490 of 2011. The Labour Court had partly allowed the reference in favour of the workman, granting reinstatement with continuity of service but without backwages. The brief facts are that by Resolution No. 139 dated 10.06.2010, the respondent No.1 (Ahmedabad Municipal Transport Services) deleted the name of the petitioner-workman from the waiting list and muster roll with retrospective effect from 13.02.2007 without giving him an opportunity of hearing and without following due procedure of law. Aggrieved, the workman filed a complaint before the Assistant Labour Commissioner, which after failure of conciliation, was referred to the Labour Court. The workman alleged that the deletion was in vengeance due to a previous reference filed by the union. The Labour Court, after considering evidence, partly allowed the reference. The High Court, in the present petition, examined the legality of the award. The court noted that the Labour Court had exercised its discretion in denying backwages, and the workman failed to prove that he was not employed elsewhere. The High Court found no perversity or illegality in the award and dismissed the petition, upholding the Labour Court's decision.

Headnote

A) Industrial Law - Reinstatement - Backwages - The Labour Court partly allowed the reference and granted reinstatement with continuity of service but without backwages. The High Court upheld the award, finding no error in the Labour Court's discretion to deny backwages as the workman did not prove he was unemployed. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the deletion of the petitioner-workman's name from the waiting list and muster roll with retrospective effect without giving opportunity of hearing and without following due procedure of law is justified, and whether the Labour Court's award of reinstatement without backwages is proper.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the petition, upholding the Labour Court's award of reinstatement without backwages.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Reinstatement without backwages
  • Industrial Dispute
  • Deletion from muster roll without opportunity of hearing
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 396

R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13842 of 2020

2026-03-05

Hemant M. Prachchhak

MR MJ MEHTA, MR SAURABH J MEHTA for the Petitioner(s) No. 1, MR DEEP D VYAS for the Respondent(s) No. 1, MR MRUNAL DHOLARIA, ASST. GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Respondent(s) No. 2

Jayantibhai Merubhai Patel

Ahmedabad Municipal Transport Services & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Industrial dispute challenging Labour Court award granting reinstatement without backwages

Remedy Sought

Petitioner-workman sought full backwages along with reinstatement

Filing Reason

Deletion of workman's name from waiting list and muster roll with retrospective effect without hearing

Previous Decisions

Labour Court partly allowed reference granting reinstatement with continuity but without backwages

Issues

Whether the Labour Court's denial of backwages was justified Whether the deletion of name without hearing was illegal

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that deletion was without opportunity of hearing and in vengeance Respondent supported the Labour Court's award

Ratio Decidendi

The Labour Court's discretion to deny backwages is justified when the workman fails to prove unemployment; reinstatement with continuity is appropriate when termination is illegal.

Judgment Excerpts

Present petition is filed by the petitioner-workman under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India read with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 challenging the judgment and award dated 18.06.2019 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Ahmedabad in Reference (LCV) No. 490 of 2011, whereby, the learned Judge has partly allowed the Reference in favour of the petitioner-workman and granted reinstatement with continuity of service but, without backwages.

Procedural History

The workman filed a complaint before the Assistant Labour Commissioner, which after conciliation failure was referred to the Labour Court. The Labour Court partly allowed the reference on 18.06.2019. The workman then filed the present petition before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
  • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Resignation by Employee Who Resigned Under Mental Stress - Resignation Tendered During Mental Illness Not Voluntary. Employee Entitled to Reinstatement Without Back Wages as Resignation Was Not Voluntary Act.
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Upholds Labour Court Award Granting Reinstatement Without Backwages in Industrial Dispute. Deletion of Workman's Name from Muster Roll Without Hearing Held Illegal, but Backwages Denied as Workman Failed to Prove Unemployment.