High Court of Gujarat Disposes of Writ Petition Seeking Direction to Gujarat State Waqf Board to Decide Applications Filed Under Waqf Act, 1995. Board Directed to Decide Applications Under Sections 69 and 70 Within Six Months After Hearing All Concerned, Ensuring Proper Administration of Waqf.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 15
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by the petitioners, who were trustees/mutawallis of a registered Waqf, against the Gujarat State Waqf Board, seeking a direction to the Board to decide their pending applications. The dispute concerned the administration of the Hazrat Sahid Pir Mehmoodshah Bukhari Dada Waqf, registered under the Waqf Act, 1995. The petitioners complained of irregularities in the scheme of the Waqf, mismanagement, and exclusion from management. They filed applications under Sections 69 and 70 of the Waqf Act for framing a scheme of better administration and for action against mismanagement, respectively. The Board did not act on these applications, prompting the petition. The core legal issue was whether the High Court under Article 226 could direct the Board to decide the applications within a time frame. The petitioners argued that the Board's inaction was illegal and violative of the Waqf Act, causing continued mismanagement. The Board's counsel assured the court that the applications would be decided within six months. The court, relying on this assurance, directed the Board to decide the applications within six months from the date of receipt of the order, after giving proper opportunity to all concerned parties. The petition was accordingly disposed of, and the rule was discharged. The court emphasized that the Board must act in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Waqf Law - Administration of Waqf - Sections 69 and 70, Waqf Act, 1995 - Mandatory Direction to Waqf Board - Petitioners sought direction to the Gujarat State Waqf Board to decide their applications for framing scheme of better administration and removal of mismanagement. The court, based on assurance by Board's counsel, directed the Board to decide the applications within six months after giving opportunity to all parties. Held that the Board shall decide the applications in accordance with law (Paras 2-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Gujarat State Waqf Board should be directed to consider and decide the petitioners' applications dated 25/01/2022 and 08/10/2024 within a time-bound schedule.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent Board to decide the petitioners' applications within six months from the date of receipt of the order, after giving proper opportunity to all concerned parties, in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Waqf Board duty to decide applications under Waqf Act
  • 1995
  • direction to decide within six months
  • opportunity of hearing to all parties
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 276

R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15015 of 2025

2026-03-17

Hemant M. Prachchhak

2026:GUJHC:20050

Rizwan Shaikh for petitioners, Manish S Shah for respondent

Dilavarmiya Dadumiya Sumra & Ors.

Gujarat State Waqf Board

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 seeking direction to Gujarat State Waqf Board to decide applications under Waqf Act

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought direction to respondent to consider and decide applications dated 25/01/2022 and 08/10/2024 in time-bound schedule

Filing Reason

Inaction by the Waqf Board on petitioners' applications for better administration and against mismanagement, leading to continued mismanagement of Waqf

Issues

Whether the Gujarat State Waqf Board should be directed to decide the petitioners' applications within a time-bound schedule.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the Board's inaction was illegal, unconstitutional, and violative of the Waqf Act, causing mismanagement. Respondent's counsel assured the court that the applications would be decided within six months.

Judgment Excerpts

the respondent Board is required to consider, appreciate and take decision on the applications made by the petitioners and communicate the decision to them within a period of 6 months the applications made by the petitioners shall be decided by the respondent Board the respondent Board is hereby directed to decide the applications made by the present petitioners within a period of 6 months from the date of receipt of writ of this Order in accordance with law, after giving proper opportunity to all the concerned parties

Procedural History

Petitioners filed applications under Sections 69 and 70 of the Waqf Act, 1995 on 25.01.2022 and 08.10.2024 respectively, followed by reminder applications on 01.02.2025. No action by respondent Board. Petitioners then filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The High Court issued Rule and after hearing both sides, disposed of the petition with directions.

Acts & Sections

  • Waqf Act, 1995: 69, 70
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeals Against Acquittal in Dowry Death Cases — Prosecution Fails to Prove Demand of Dowry and Harassment. The court upheld the trial court's acquittal under Sections 498-A and 304-B IPC and Sections 3 and 4...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Gujarat Disposes of Writ Petition Seeking Direction to Gujarat State Waqf Board to Decide Applications Filed Under Waqf Act, 1995. Board Directed to Decide Applications Under Sections 69 and 70 Within Six Months After Hearing All Concer...