Gujarat High Court Grants Regular Bail to Applicant in Land Grabbing Case Under Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020 — Considering Charge-sheet Filed and No Custodial Interrogation Required. Court Held That No Useful Purpose Would Be Served by Keeping Applicant in Jail for Indefinite Period After Filing of Charge-sheet.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 24
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Makabhai Kababhai Varu (Bharwad), filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking regular bail in connection with FIR No. 11198070250533/2025 registered with Mahuva Rural Police Station, Bhavnagar, for offences punishable under Sections 4(2) and 5(c) of the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020. The applicant's counsel argued that considering the role attributed and the nature of allegations, and since the charge-sheet had already been filed, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for an indefinite period. The applicant expressed readiness to abide by any conditions imposed by the court. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. The court, after hearing both sides, noted that the charge-sheet had been filed and no custodial interrogation was required. The court found it a fit case to exercise discretion in favor of the applicant and granted regular bail subject to certain conditions, including executing a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with one surety, not misusing liberty, not tampering with evidence, and marking presence before the police station once per month for six months. The court clarified that observations were only for the purpose of deciding the bail application and not on the merits of the trial.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Regular Bail - Section 483 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Applicant sought regular bail after charge-sheet was filed for offences under Sections 4(2) and 5(c) of the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020 - Court granted bail considering that charge-sheet was already filed, no custodial interrogation was required, and the applicant was ready to abide by conditions - Held that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for an indefinite period (Paras 3-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after filing of charge-sheet, in connection with offences under Sections 4(2) and 5(c) of the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with FIR No. 11198070250533/2025 registered with Mahuva Rural Police Station, Bhavnagar, on executing a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court, subject to conditions including not misusing liberty, not tampering with evidence, and marking presence before the police station once per month for six months. Observations are only for bail purpose and not on merits of trial.

Law Points

  • Bail
  • Regular bail
  • Charge-sheet filed
  • No custodial interrogation
  • Section 483 BNSS
  • Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act
  • 2020
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 266

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 2110 of 2026

2026-03-24

NIKHIL S. KARIEL

MR VASIMKHAN Y PATHAN, MR VIVEK V BHAMARE, MR HARDIK MEHTA

Makabhai Kababhai Varu (Bharwad)

State of Gujarat

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal miscellaneous application for regular bail after charge-sheet under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023.

Remedy Sought

Applicant sought enlargement on regular bail in connection with FIR for offences under Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020.

Filing Reason

Applicant was arrested and charge-sheeted for alleged land grabbing; he sought bail on ground that charge-sheet was filed and no custodial interrogation was required.

Issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 BNSS after filing of charge-sheet in a land grabbing case.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant's counsel submitted that considering the role attributed and nature of allegations, and since charge-sheet is filed, no useful purpose would be served by keeping applicant in jail for indefinite period; applicant ready to abide by conditions. Learned APP opposed the bail application.

Ratio Decidendi

After filing of charge-sheet, when no custodial interrogation is required, keeping the accused in jail for an indefinite period serves no useful purpose; bail can be granted under Section 483 BNSS subject to conditions to secure presence and prevent tampering.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of the allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail. Since the charge-sheet is filed no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. The applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court.

Procedural History

FIR registered at Mahuva Rural Police Station for offences under Sections 4(2) and 5(c) of Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020. Charge-sheet was filed. Applicant filed this application under Section 483 BNSS for regular bail. Heard on 24/03/2026 and allowed.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: 483
  • Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020: 4(2), 5(c)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Grants Regular Bail to Applicant in Land Grabbing Case Under Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020 — Considering Charge-sheet Filed and No Custodial Interrogation Required. Court Held That No Useful Purpose Would Be Serve...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals in Service Matter - Selection Process for Assistant Professor Upheld Despite Alleged Irregularities. Court holds that selection committee's decision based on qualifications and interview performance cannot be in...