Gujarat High Court Allows Release of Seized Light Diesel Oil in Criminal Case Due to Perishable Nature. Muddamal Ordered to be Released to Owner on Conditions Including Furnishing of Bank Guarantee and Undertaking.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Bivesh Kumar Singh, filed a Special Criminal Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking release of muddamal Light Diesel Oil seized in connection with FIR No. 11199061250374 of 2025 registered at Ankleshwar City B Division Police Station, Bharuch. The petitioner claimed ownership of the oil and stated that his applications for release before the Magistrate and Sessions Court were rejected. The petitioner argued that the oil is perishable and would deteriorate if not released, and that no other claimant had come forward. The State opposed the release, contending that the oil was used illegally. The court, considering the perishable nature of the goods and following coordinate bench precedents, allowed the petition. It quashed the impugned orders and directed release of the oil subject to conditions: the petitioner must furnish a bank guarantee of Rs. 1,00,000, execute an undertaking to produce the oil if required, provide details of the party receiving the oil (who must hold a valid license), and not transfer ownership without court permission. The court also directed the trial court to expedite the trial.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Release of Muddamal - Perishable Goods - Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India - The petitioner sought release of seized Light Diesel Oil, which is perishable and likely to deteriorate if kept in custody. The court held that continuing seizure of perishable goods does not further the cause of justice and ordered release on conditions including furnishing of bank guarantee and undertaking. (Paras 6-9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the seized Light Diesel Oil, being perishable in nature, should be released to the petitioner pending trial.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The impugned orders are quashed and set aside. The authority is directed to release the muddamal Light Diesel Oil to the petitioner on conditions: (i) petitioner to furnish bank guarantee of Rs. 1,00,000; (ii) execute an undertaking to produce the oil as and when required; (iii) provide details of the party to whom oil is handed over, who must hold a valid license; (iv) not to transfer ownership or create third-party rights without court permission; (v) trial court to expedite trial.

Law Points

  • Release of muddamal
  • perishable goods
  • interim custody
  • Article 226
  • Article 227
  • Code of Criminal Procedure
  • 1973
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 265

R/Special Criminal Application (Possession of Muddamal) No. 2219 of 2026

2026-03-24

M. R. Mengdey

Mr. Virat G. Popat, Advocate for Mr Prem D Dave for the Applicant; Ms. Krina Calla, APP for the Respondent No. 1

Bivesh Kumar Singh

State of Gujarat & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal miscellaneous application for release of seized muddamal (Light Diesel Oil) pending trial.

Remedy Sought

Release of muddamal Light Diesel Oil to the petitioner and quashing of orders refusing release.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's applications for release of the seized oil were rejected by the Magistrate and Sessions Court.

Previous Decisions

The Magistrate Court rejected the application for release; the Sessions Court also rejected the revision.

Issues

Whether the seized Light Diesel Oil, being perishable, should be released to the owner pending trial.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: The oil is perishable and will deteriorate; no other claimant; petitioner is owner; willing to abide by conditions. Respondent-State: The oil was used illegally; opposes release.

Ratio Decidendi

Seized perishable goods, if not released, will deteriorate and lose value, and their continued seizure does not aid the cause of justice. Hence, courts should exercise discretion to release such goods on suitable conditions to the owner.

Judgment Excerpts

if the muddamal – Light Diesel Oil in question is not released, ultimately it would reduce as it is a perishable goods. continuing the oil in seizure as muddamal, for various reasons, hardly turns out to be a factor for furtherance of dispensation of justice

Procedural History

FIR registered in 2025; petitioner applied for release before Magistrate, rejected; approached Sessions Court, rejected; then filed present petition under Articles 226 and 227.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Adoption Agency to Continue Operations Pending Renewal of License — Best Interest of Child Paramount. Licensing Authority Cannot Refuse Renewal Based on Pending Criminal Proceedings Without Giving Opportunity of Hearing.
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Release of Seized Light Diesel Oil in Criminal Case Due to Perishable Nature. Muddamal Ordered to be Released to Owner on Conditions Including Furnishing of Bank Guarantee and Undertaking.