Gujarat High Court Allows Transfer of Family Suit from Radhanpur to Deodar on Wife's Plea of Financial Hardship and Convenience. Wife's Convenience Prevails Over Husband's Choice of Forum in Transfer Petition Under Section 24 CPC.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 45
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Kajalben, wife of Hareshbhai Raval, filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of Family Suit No.33 of 2025 from the Family Court at Radhanpur, District Patan, to the Family Court at Deodar, District Banaskantha. The marriage was solemnized in 2021 at Dhanakwada, and the couple resided at Madhapur, Taluka Radhanpur. Disputes arose, leading the wife to file a written complaint on 19.10.2024 before the Mahila Police Station, Palanpur, and her mother filed a complaint on 20.10.2024 before the Deodar Police Station. The wife also filed Family Suit No.31 of 2025 before the Family Court, Deodar, seeking divorce and permanent monthly alimony of Rs.40,000/-. In response, the husband filed Family Suit No.33 of 2025 before the Family Court, Radhanpur, seeking restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The wife sought transfer of the husband's suit to Deodar, arguing that the distance between Deodar and Radhanpur is approximately 45 kms one way, and due to financial constraints, she is unable to travel to Radhanpur. The husband's counsel opposed the transfer, submitting that the husband is willing to bear the travel expenses of the wife. The Court considered the submissions and held that the wife's convenience and financial hardship must be given weight, and that the husband, being the petitioner in the suit, can travel to Deodar. The Court allowed the application, transferring Family Suit No.33 of 2025 from the Family Court, Radhanpur to the Family Court, Deodar, and directed the transferee court to proceed with the suit from the stage at which it was transferred. Rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Proceedings - Section 24 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Convenience of Wife - The applicant-wife sought transfer of a restitution of conjugal rights suit filed by the husband from Family Court, Radhanpur to Family Court, Deodar, citing financial constraints and distance of 45 kms one way. The Court allowed the transfer, holding that the wife's convenience and financial hardship must be considered, and that the husband can travel to Deodar. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Family Suit No.33 of 2025 pending before the Family Court, Radhanpur should be transferred to the Family Court, Deodar on the ground of convenience of the wife-applicant.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. Family Suit No.33 of 2025 pending before the learned Family Court, Radhanpur is transferred to the learned Family Court, Deodar. The transferee court shall proceed with the suit from the stage at which it was transferred. Rule is made absolute with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Transfer of proceedings under Section 24 CPC
  • convenience of wife
  • financial constraints
  • distance between courts
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:20091

R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR TRANSFER) NO. 3017 of 2025

2026-03-13

Devan M. Desai

2026:GUJHC:20091

V.R. Halani for applicant, V.C. Vaghela for respondent

Kajalben w/o Hareshbhai Madevbhai Raval d/o Nanjibhai Devshibhai Raval

Hareshbhai Madevbhai Raval

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Remedy Sought

Transfer of Family Suit No.33 of 2025 from Family Court, Radhanpur to Family Court, Deodar

Filing Reason

Wife unable to travel 45 kms one way due to financial constraints

Issues

Whether the Family Suit No.33 of 2025 should be transferred from Radhanpur to Deodar on grounds of wife's convenience and financial hardship.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant-wife submitted that distance between Deodar and Radhanpur is 45 kms one way and due to financial constraints she cannot travel. Respondent-husband submitted that he is willing to bear the travel expenses of the wife.

Ratio Decidendi

In transfer petitions under Section 24 CPC, the convenience of the wife, especially financial constraints and distance, is a paramount consideration. The husband, being the petitioner in the suit, can travel to the wife's preferred forum.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the financial constraints, applicant is unable to travel from Deodar to Radhanpur. The husband, being the petitioner in the suit, can travel to Deodar.

Procedural History

The applicant-wife filed a transfer application under Section 24 CPC on 13/03/2026. The matter was heard and disposed of on the same day with consent of parties.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 24
  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 9
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Improper Income Assessment — Tribunal's Rejection of Documentary Evidence Without Reasons Set Aside. The Court held that the claimants had sufficiently proved the deceased's income fro...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Transfer of Family Suit from Radhanpur to Deodar on Wife's Plea of Financial Hardship and Convenience. Wife's Convenience Prevails Over Husband's Choice of Forum in Transfer Petition Under Section 24 CPC.