Gujarat High Court Allows Transfer of Family Suit from Gandhinagar to Rajkot in Wife's Favor Under Section 24 CPC. Transfer Granted Due to Convenience of Wife Who Has Multiple Proceedings Pending at Rajkot and No Independent Means to Travel.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Varsha Chandubhai Rathod, filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of Family Suit No. 318 of 2025 from the Family Court at Gandhinagar to a competent court at Rajkot. The marriage between the parties was solemnized on 15.07.2024 as per Hindu rites. Disputes arose, leading to the wife filing a Maintenance Application under Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Cr.M.A. No. 307 of 2025) before the JMFC, Rajkot, a complaint under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 in March 2025, and an FIR under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Mahila Police Station, Rajkot on 10.04.2025. The husband, Jignesh Kishorbhai Pabari, filed a suit under Sections 11 and 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the Family Court at Gandhinagar seeking declaration of the marriage as void. The wife, residing at Rajkot with her parents and having no independent means, contended that it was extremely inconvenient and financially burdensome for her to travel to Gandhinagar to defend the suit, especially given the pendency of multiple proceedings at Rajkot. The court, after hearing the applicant's counsel (respondent served but absent), found that the balance of convenience was in favor of the wife. The court noted that the wife had already initiated several proceedings at Rajkot and that requiring her to travel to Gandhinagar would cause undue hardship. The court allowed the application, transferring Family Suit No. 318 of 2025 from the Family Court, Gandhinagar to the Family Court, Rajkot, or any other competent court at Rajkot, with a direction to the transferee court to decide the suit on its own merits without being influenced by any observations made in the order.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Suit - Section 24 CPC - Transfer on Grounds of Convenience - Wife sought transfer of Family Suit from Gandhinagar to Rajkot where she resides and where multiple proceedings (maintenance, domestic violence complaint, FIR) are pending - Court held that it is just and proper to transfer the suit to avoid inconvenience and hardship to the wife, especially when she has no independent income and has to travel long distance - Held that transfer is necessary to ensure effective access to justice and to avoid multiplicity of litigation (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Family Suit filed by the husband at Gandhinagar should be transferred to Rajkot where the wife resides and where other proceedings are pending.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. Family Suit No. 318 of 2025 pending before the learned Family Court, Gandhinagar is ordered to be transferred to the learned Family Court, Rajkot or any other competent court at Rajkot. The transferee court shall decide the suit on its own merits without being influenced by any observations made in this order.

Law Points

  • Transfer of proceedings under Section 24 CPC
  • convenience of wife
  • multiple proceedings at one place
  • avoidance of multiplicity of litigation
  • protection of women
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:20743

R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR TRANSFER) NO. 199 of 2026

2026-03-13

Devan M. Desai

2026:GUJHC:20743

Mr. Jay B. Ambani for the applicant; Notice served for the opponent

Varsha Chandubhai Rathod

Jignesh Kishorbhai Pabari

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Miscellaneous Civil Application for transfer of a family suit from one family court to another under Section 24 CPC.

Remedy Sought

Transfer of Family Suit No. 318 of 2025 from Family Court, Gandhinagar to a competent court at Rajkot.

Filing Reason

The applicant-wife sought transfer on grounds of convenience as she resides in Rajkot, has no independent income, and multiple proceedings are pending at Rajkot, making it difficult to travel to Gandhinagar.

Issues

Whether the Family Suit filed by the husband at Gandhinagar should be transferred to Rajkot for the convenience of the wife.

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant-wife submitted that she resides at Rajkot with her parents and has no means of survival. She has filed Maintenance Application under Section 144 BNSS, a complaint under DV Act, and an FIR at Rajkot. The husband filed a suit at Gandhinagar, causing inconvenience and hardship to her.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 24 CPC, the court has discretion to transfer a suit if it is just and proper, especially when the wife has multiple proceedings pending at one place and would face hardship in traveling to another place. The convenience of the wife and avoidance of multiplicity of litigation are paramount considerations.

Judgment Excerpts

The present Application is filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908... Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 15.07.2024... The applicant is residing at Rajkot with her parents and she has no other means of survival. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the present application is allowed.

Procedural History

The applicant filed MCA under Section 24 CPC seeking transfer of Family Suit No. 318/2025 from Gandhinagar to Rajkot. The court heard the applicant's counsel on 13/03/2026 and passed the order allowing the transfer.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: 24
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: 144
  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005: 12
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: 85, 115(2), 352, 54
  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: 11, 12
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute. Court upholds award granting compensation for work done, security deposit refund, and loss of profit under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Recognition of 'No Religion' as a Form of Religion. Article 25 of the Constitution does not confer a right to compel State recognition of 'No Religion' as a religion, and a writ of mandamus cannot be issued wit...