Gujarat High Court Allows Wife's Revision in Maintenance Case Under Section 125 CrPC, Quashes Set-Off Direction. Voluntary payments made by husband prior to filing of maintenance application cannot be set off against awarded maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Manishaben Vijaybhai Shah, married respondent No. 2 on 11.12.2000 and resided at her matrimonial home in Bhavnagar. She alleged she was driven out on 01.08.2007 and has since lived with her parents in Ahmedabad. She filed proceedings under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act (Criminal Misc. Application No. 352 of 2016) before the JMFC, Ahmedabad (Rural), which directed respondent No. 2 to pay Rs. 8,000 per month. She also filed an application under Section 125 CrPC (Criminal Misc. Application No. 214 of 2016) before the Family Court, Ahmedabad. The Family Court partly allowed the application on 09.01.2020, directing respondent No. 2 to pay Rs. 15,000 per month as maintenance from the date of application (25.01.2016). However, it further directed that the amount voluntarily paid by respondent No. 2 prior to filing of the application shall be given set-off. The applicant challenged this set-off direction in revision. The High Court held that the direction for set-off of prior voluntary payments is contrary to law, as maintenance under Section 125 CrPC is awarded from the date of application and such payments cannot be deducted. The court allowed the revision application, quashed the set-off direction, and directed respondent No. 2 to pay the arrears of maintenance without any set-off.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Maintenance - Section 125 CrPC - Set-off of prior voluntary payments - The Family Court's direction to set off amounts voluntarily paid by the husband prior to the filing of the maintenance application against the awarded maintenance is contrary to law, as maintenance under Section 125 CrPC is awarded from the date of application and prior voluntary payments cannot be deducted. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Family Court's direction to set off voluntary payments made by the husband prior to filing of the maintenance application against the awarded maintenance is legally sustainable under Section 125 CrPC

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The revision application is allowed. The impugned judgment and award dated 09.01.2020 passed by the Family Court, Ahmedabad in Criminal Misc. Application No. 214 of 2016 is modified to the extent that direction no. 3 regarding set-off of prior voluntary payments is quashed and set aside. Respondent No. 2 is directed to pay the arrears of maintenance without any set-off.

Law Points

  • Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC cannot be set off against voluntary payments made prior to filing of application
  • Maintenance is awarded from date of application
  • Voluntary payments prior to application are not deductible
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 491

R/Criminal Revision Application (For Maintenance) No. 399 of 2020

2026-03-24

Hasmukh D. Suthar

Bhavin B Thakar, Tapaswi P Raval for Applicant; Dr. Abhisst K Thaker for Respondent No. 2; Mr. Rohan Raval, APP for Respondent No. 1

Manishaben Vijaybhai Shah W/o Bhaveshbhai Ramniklal Shah

State of Gujarat & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Revision Application challenging the Family Court's order granting set-off of prior voluntary payments against maintenance awarded under Section 125 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Enhancement of maintenance and quashing of direction no. 3 regarding set-off

Filing Reason

The Family Court directed set-off of amounts voluntarily paid by respondent No. 2 prior to filing of the maintenance application, which the applicant contends is contrary to law

Previous Decisions

Family Court, Ahmedabad partly allowed Criminal Misc. Application No. 214 of 2016 on 09.01.2020, directing Rs. 15,000 per month maintenance from date of application with set-off of prior voluntary payments

Issues

Whether the direction to set off voluntary payments made prior to filing of the maintenance application is legally valid under Section 125 CrPC

Submissions/Arguments

Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that the direction granting set-off for amount paid prior to filing of the application is contrary to law, particularly in view of the finding that maintenance is awarded from the date of application

Ratio Decidendi

Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC is awarded from the date of application, and voluntary payments made by the husband prior to filing of the application cannot be set off against the awarded maintenance, as such set-off is contrary to the scheme of Section 125 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

Learned advocate for the applicant, while restricting the challenge, has submitted that such direction granting set-off for the amount paid prior to filing of the application is contrary to law, particularly in view of the finding that maintenance is awarded from the date of application.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Criminal Misc. Application No. 214 of 2016 under Section 125 CrPC before the Family Court, Ahmedabad, which was partly allowed on 09.01.2020. The applicant then filed the present Criminal Revision Application No. 399 of 2020 before the High Court of Gujarat challenging the set-off direction.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 125
  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005: 12
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Wife's Revision in Maintenance Case Under Section 125 CrPC, Quashes Set-Off Direction. Voluntary payments made by husband prior to filing of maintenance application cannot be set off against awarded maintenance under Section...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Violation of Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India renders detention order invalid.