Gujarat High Court Directs Expedited Hearing of Arbitration Petition Under Gujarat Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal Act, 1992 — Petitioner Sought Direction to Decide Arbitration Petition No. 38 of 2025 Expeditiously. Court Directed Tribunal to Decide Within One Year Considering Pendency of Prior Petitions.

High Court: Gujarat High Court
  • 102
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Nirmal Build Infra Private Limited, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Gujarat High Court seeking a direction to expedite the hearing of Arbitration Petition No. 38 of 2025 pending before the Arbitration Tribunal constituted under the Gujarat Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal Act, 1992. The contract in question was of the year 2022, and the arbitration petition was filed in 2025. The petitioner alleged that respondent No.2 was taking coercive steps against it pending the arbitration proceedings. The respondent State, through the Assistant Government Pleader, submitted that the arbitration petition was filed in 2025 and left it to the court to pass appropriate orders. The court noted that even arbitration petitions prior to 2025 were still pending before the Tribunal. Considering the submissions and the fact of pendency, the court directed the learned Arbitration Tribunal to decide the Arbitration Petition No. 38 of 2025 as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt of the order. The petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Arbitration - Expedited Hearing - Section 8(4) of Gujarat Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal Act, 1992 - Petitioner sought direction to expedite hearing of Arbitration Petition No. 38 of 2025, alleging coercive steps by respondent No.2 - Court directed the Arbitration Tribunal to decide the petition as expeditiously as possible, preferably within one year from receipt of order - Held that considering pendency of prior petitions, a time-bound disposal is warranted (Paras 3-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Arbitration Petition No. 38 of 2025 pending before the Arbitration Tribunal should be heard and decided expeditiously, given the coercive steps alleged by the petitioner.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the learned Arbitration Tribunal to decide Arbitration Petition No. 38 of 2025 as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of 1 year from the date of receipt of the order. The Special Civil Application was disposed of accordingly. Rule made absolute to the aforesaid extent. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Expeditious disposal of arbitration petition
  • Section 8(4) of Gujarat Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal Act
  • 1992
  • Direction to decide within one year
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 855

R/Special Civil Application No. 3470 of 2026

2026-03-20

Hemant M. Prachchhak

2026:GUJHC:21174

Paras K Sukhwani for Petitioner, Vaibhav Sharma AGP for Respondents

Nirmal Build Infra Private Limited

State of Gujarat & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking direction to expedite hearing of arbitration petition

Remedy Sought

Direction to hear and decide Arbitration Petition No. 38 of 2025 expeditiously within the mandate of Section 8(4) of the Gujarat Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal Act, 1992

Filing Reason

Petitioner alleged coercive steps by respondent No.2 pending arbitration proceedings

Issues

Whether the Arbitration Petition No. 38 of 2025 should be heard and decided expeditiously

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted that contract was of 2022, notice issued in 2025, respondent No.2 already served, and coercive steps were being taken; sought expedited hearing. Respondent AGP submitted that arbitration petition was filed in 2025 and left it to court to pass appropriate orders.

Ratio Decidendi

Considering the pendency of prior arbitration petitions and the petitioner's allegation of coercive steps, the Arbitration Tribunal must decide the petition expeditiously, preferably within one year, to ensure timely justice.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions and the fact that even the arbitration petitions prior to the year 2025 are still pending before the learned Arbitration Tribunal, it is directed that the learned Arbitration Tribunal shall decide the present Arbitration Petition as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of 1 year from the date of receipt of this order.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Special Civil Application No. 3470 of 2026 before the Gujarat High Court seeking expedited hearing of Arbitration Petition No. 38 of 2025. The court issued rule and with consent of parties, took up the matter for final hearing. After hearing submissions, the court disposed of the petition with directions.

Acts & Sections

  • Gujarat Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal Act, 1992: Section 8(4)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Injured Tailor in Motor Accident Case — Apportionment of Liability Between Joint Tortfeasors Upheld. Claimant with 40% permanent disability awarded Rs. 5,00,000/- under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, ...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Directs Expedited Hearing of Arbitration Petition Under Gujarat Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal Act, 1992 — Petitioner Sought Direction to Decide Arbitration Petition No. 38 of 2025 Expeditiously. Court Direc...