Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appeal by Electricity Company in Electrocution Death Case. Negligence Established Under Res Ipsa Loquitur as Live Wire Caused Death of Plumber.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 21
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal by Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd (PGVCL) against a judgment and decree dated 13.11.2006 passed by the 4th Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Bhuj, in Special Civil Suit No.64 of 2003. The plaintiffs, parents of the deceased Abdul Hasam, filed a suit claiming compensation for his death due to electrocution. The deceased was a plumber earning Rs.150 per day and was the sole breadwinner. On 6.12.2001, while passing near a lake at village Bharasar, he came into contact with a live wire of PGVCL and died on the spot. The plaintiffs alleged negligence on the part of PGVCL in maintaining the wire. PGVCL denied liability, claiming the deceased was negligent. The trial court decreed the suit, awarding Rs.3,38,000 with 9% interest from the date of filing till realization. PGVCL appealed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The High Court, after considering the evidence and arguments, held that the principle of res ipsa loquitur applies, as the live wire was under the control of PGVCL and the accident would not have occurred in the ordinary course if proper care had been taken. The court found no contributory negligence on the part of the deceased. The compensation was deemed just and proper, and the appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs. The civil application also stood disposed of.

Headnote

A) Tort Law - Negligence - Electrocution Death - Strict Liability - The appellant electricity company failed to maintain its live wire, which came in contact with the deceased, causing death. The court held that the principle of res ipsa loquitur applies, and the company is liable for negligence. (Paras 1-8)

B) Compensation - Quantum - Death of Plumber - The deceased was a plumber earning Rs.150 per day. The trial court awarded Rs.3,38,000 with 9% interest. The High Court found no reason to interfere, as the compensation was just and proper. (Paras 1-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant PGVCL is liable for negligence in maintaining its electrical wires resulting in the death of the deceased, and whether the compensation awarded by the trial court is just and proper.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial court's judgment and decree. No order as to costs. The civil application also stands disposed of.

Law Points

  • Negligence
  • Strict Liability
  • Res Ipsa Loquitur
  • Compensation
  • Interest
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 321

R/First Appeal No. 3505 of 2007

2026-03-10

J. C. Doshi

MS RV ACHARYA, MR EE SAIYED, MR NASIR SAIYED

Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd

Hasam Mamad Sama & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First Appeal under Section 96 of CPC challenging judgment and decree in a civil suit for compensation for death due to electrocution.

Remedy Sought

Appellant PGVCL sought to set aside the trial court's decree awarding compensation to the plaintiffs.

Filing Reason

Appellant aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 13.11.2006 passed by the 4th Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Bhuj, in Special Civil Suit No.64 of 2003.

Previous Decisions

Trial court decreed the suit and directed PGVCL to pay Rs.3,38,000 with 9% interest.

Issues

Whether the appellant PGVCL was negligent in maintaining the live wire that caused the death of the deceased. Whether the compensation awarded by the trial court is just and proper.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the incident occurred due to the sole negligence of the deceased, who failed to take necessary care. Respondents argued that the appellant was negligent in maintaining the live wire, leading to the death of their son.

Ratio Decidendi

The principle of res ipsa loquitur applies to cases of electrocution from live wires under the control of the electricity company. The company is liable for negligence if the accident would not have occurred in the ordinary course without negligence. The deceased was not contributorily negligent.

Judgment Excerpts

By way of filing present First Appeal u/s 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short “the Code”), the appellant – PGVCL challenges judgment and decree dated 13.11.2006 passed by the learned 4th Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Bhuj, whereby the learned trial Court has decreed Special Civil Suit NO.64 of 2003 and directed the PGVCL to pay Rs.3,38,000/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till realization for the death of Abdul Hasam.

Procedural History

Plaintiffs filed Special Civil Suit No.64 of 2003 before the 4th Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Bhuj, seeking compensation for death due to electrocution. The suit was decreed on 13.11.2006. PGVCL appealed under Section 96 of CPC to the High Court of Gujarat, which dismissed the appeal on 10.03.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: 96
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appeal by Electricity Company in Electrocution Death Case. Negligence Established Under Res Ipsa Loquitur as Live Wire Caused Death of Plumber.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging HRA Entitlement for Ordnance Factory Employees Who Built Own Houses. Employees who constructed own houses without obtaining non-availability certificate are not entitled to House Rent ...