Gujarat High Court Quashes Cancellation of Bail in Criminal Breach of Trust Case — Petitioner's Regular Bail Restored as Sessions Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 528 BNSS. The Sessions Court cannot cancel bail on merits under Section 528 BNSS; only supervening circumstances justify cancellation.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 65
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mahammad Sahal Ismail Patel, was granted regular bail by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) on 08.10.2025 in connection with FIR No. 11199010250535 registered at Bharuch City 'A' Division Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 409, 406, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The State of Gujarat filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) before the learned District and Sessions Court, Bharuch, seeking cancellation of the bail. The Sessions Court, by order dated 15.12.2025 in CRMA No.823 of 2025, cancelled the regular bail. Aggrieved, the petitioner approached the High Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Section 528 BNSS. The High Court examined the scope of Section 528 BNSS, which confers revisional powers on the Sessions Court. It held that the Sessions Court, while exercising such powers, cannot cancel a regular bail granted by the Magistrate on merits; it can only examine the legality or propriety of the order. The court noted that the grounds for cancellation of bail are different from grounds for rejection of bail. Cancellation requires supervening circumstances such as violation of bail conditions, tampering with evidence, or fleeing from justice. In the present case, the Sessions Court had re-appreciated the evidence and substituted its own view, which was impermissible. The High Court, therefore, quashed the impugned order dated 15.12.2025 and restored the regular bail granted to the petitioner on 08.10.2025.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Bail Cancellation - Jurisdiction under Section 528 BNSS - The Sessions Court, while exercising powers under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, cannot cancel a regular bail granted by the Magistrate on merits; it can only examine the legality or propriety of the order. The impugned order cancelling bail was set aside as the Sessions Court exceeded its jurisdiction by re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view. (Paras 1-12)

B) Criminal Procedure - Bail - Cancellation vs. Rejection - The grounds for cancellation of bail are distinct from grounds for rejection of bail; cancellation requires supervening circumstances or violation of bail conditions. In the absence of such circumstances, the Sessions Court erred in cancelling the bail. (Paras 8-12)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the learned District and Sessions Court had the jurisdiction to cancel the regular bail granted by the learned JMFC under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and whether the order of cancellation was legally sustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned order dated 15.12.2025 passed by the learned District and Sessions Court, Bharuch in CRMA No.823 of 2025, and restored the regular bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 08.10.2025 passed by the learned JMFC.

Law Points

  • Bail cancellation
  • Jurisdiction under Section 528 BNSS
  • Scope of revisional powers
  • Regular bail cannot be cancelled on merits by Sessions Court under Section 528 BNSS
  • Distinction between cancellation of bail and rejection of bail
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 244

R/Special Criminal Application (Quashing) No. 2002 of 2026

2026-03-10

M. R. Mengdey

Mr. P P Majmudar for the Applicant, Mr. Hardik Dave, Public Prosecutor with Mr. Himanshu Patel, APP for the Respondent No. 1

Mahammad Sahal Ismail Patel (Taluka Development Officer, Naitrang)(Patel Mohamedsahal Ismail)

State of Gujarat & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Section 528 BNSS seeking quashing of an order cancelling regular bail.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the order dated 15.12.2025 passed by the learned District and Sessions Court, Bharuch in CRMA No.823 of 2025 cancelling the regular bail granted to the petitioner.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's regular bail was cancelled by the Sessions Court under Section 528 BNSS, which the petitioner contends was without jurisdiction and on merits.

Previous Decisions

The learned JMFC granted regular bail to the petitioner on 08.10.2025 in CRMA No.1495 of 2025. The State filed an application under Section 528 BNSS, and the Sessions Court cancelled the bail on 15.12.2025.

Issues

Whether the Sessions Court had jurisdiction under Section 528 BNSS to cancel regular bail granted by the Magistrate on merits? Whether the order of cancellation of bail was legally sustainable in the absence of supervening circumstances?

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the Sessions Court exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 528 BNSS by re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view, which is impermissible. The State argued that the bail was granted erroneously and the Sessions Court rightly cancelled it.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the Sessions Court, while exercising revisional powers, cannot cancel a regular bail granted by the Magistrate on merits; cancellation of bail requires supervening circumstances such as violation of bail conditions, tampering with evidence, or fleeing from justice. The Sessions Court exceeded its jurisdiction by re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view.

Judgment Excerpts

The Sessions Court, while exercising powers under Section 528 BNSS, cannot cancel a regular bail granted by the Magistrate on merits; it can only examine the legality or propriety of the order. The grounds for cancellation of bail are distinct from grounds for rejection of bail; cancellation requires supervening circumstances or violation of bail conditions.

Procedural History

FIR registered at Bharuch City 'A' Division Police Station for offences under IPC. Petitioner granted regular bail by JMFC on 08.10.2025. State filed application under Section 528 BNSS before Sessions Court, which cancelled bail on 15.12.2025. Petitioner filed present petition on 10.03.2026, which was allowed.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: 528
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 409, 406, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120(B), 114
  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes Cancellation of Bail in Criminal Breach of Trust Case — Petitioner's Regular Bail Restored as Sessions Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 528 BNSS. The Sessions Court cannot cancel bail on merits under Section 528 ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.