Gujarat High Court Allows Additional Compensation Under Section 30(3) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 for Land Acquired Under National Highways Act, 1956 — Multiplier Factor-2 Already Applied, Yet Solatium Payable on Market Value from Preliminary Notification Date

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 77
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, whose lands were acquired under the National Highways Act, 1956, filed writ petitions seeking the benefit of additional compensation at 12% per annum under Section 30(3) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (the 2013 Act). The market value of the land had been determined under Section 26 of the 2013 Act with the application of multiplier Factor-2, but the additional compensation under Section 30(3) was not granted. The petitioners contended that the additional compensation should be paid on the market value from the date of the preliminary notification under Section 3A of the National Highways Act, 1956 until the date of the award or taking possession, whichever is earlier. The respondents argued that since multiplier Factor-2 had already been applied, no further additional compensation was payable. The court, after hearing the parties, held that Section 30(3) of the 2013 Act provides for solatium on the market value determined under Section 26, and the period for such additional compensation commences from the date of the preliminary notification under the National Highways Act, 1956, as the acquisition is deemed to be under the 2013 Act. The court further held that the application of multiplier Factor-2 does not bar the grant of additional compensation under Section 30(3), as the two benefits are distinct and cumulative. Accordingly, the court allowed the petitions and directed the respondents to pay additional compensation at 12% per annum on the market value from the date of the preliminary notification under Section 3A of the National Highways Act, 1956 till the date of the award or possession, whichever is earlier, within a period of three months.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Additional Compensation under Section 30(3) - Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Section 30(3) - Petitioners sought additional compensation at 12% on market value from date of preliminary notification under Section 3A of National Highways Act, 1956 till award/possession - Court held that Section 30(3) provides for solatium on market value determined under Section 26, and the period runs from the date of preliminary notification under the National Highways Act, 1956, as the acquisition is deemed under the 2013 Act - Held that the benefit is admissible even if multiplier Factor-2 was applied (Paras 2-5)

B) Land Acquisition - Multiplier Factor-2 and Additional Compensation - Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Sections 26 and 30(3) - The application of multiplier Factor-2 under Section 26 does not preclude the grant of additional compensation under Section 30(3) - The two benefits are distinct and cumulative - Held that the petitioners are entitled to additional compensation at 12% per annum on the market value from the date of preliminary notification under Section 3A of the National Highways Act, 1956 till the date of award or possession, whichever is earlier (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners are entitled to additional compensation at 12% per annum under Section 30(3) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 on the market value of land acquired under the National Highways Act, 1956, for the period from the date of preliminary notification under Section 3A of the National Highways Act, 1956 till the date of award or possession, even when multiplier Factor-2 has already been applied in the award

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petitions and directed the respondents to pay additional compensation at 12% per annum under Section 30(3) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 on the market value determined under Section 26 of the said Act, from the date of preliminary notification under Section 3A of the National Highways Act, 1956 till the date of award or taking possession, whichever is earlier, within a period of three months from the date of the judgment.

Law Points

  • Additional compensation under Section 30(3) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition
  • Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act
  • 2013 is payable on the market value determined under Section 26 of the same Act
  • even if multiplier Factor-2 has been applied
  • and the period commences from the date of preliminary notification under Section 3A of the National Highways Act
  • 1956 until the date of award or possession
  • whichever is earlier
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:22212-DB

R/Special Civil Application No. 3696 of 2026 with connected matters

2026-03-24

Sunita Agarwal, D.N. Ray

2026:GUJHC:22212-DB

Ms. Divyanshi Singh, Mr. Aishwary B. Gupta, Mr. A.J. Yagnik, Mr. Tushar L. Chauhan, Ms. Hetal Patel, Mr. Sanjay Udhawani, Mr. Ankit Shah, Nanavati & Co.

Digvijaysinh Jashwantsinh Solanki & Anr.

Competent Authority and Special Land Acquisition Officer & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions seeking benefits of additional compensation under Section 30(3) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought direction to respondents to pay additional compensation at 12% per annum on the market value of the land from the date of preliminary notification under Section 3A of the National Highways Act, 1956 till the date of award or possession, whichever is earlier

Filing Reason

The respondents did not grant additional compensation under Section 30(3) of the 2013 Act despite applying multiplier Factor-2 under Section 26

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to additional compensation under Section 30(3) of the 2013 Act on the market value determined under Section 26, even when multiplier Factor-2 has been applied What is the period for which such additional compensation is payable

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners submitted that additional compensation under Section 30(3) is payable on the market value from the date of preliminary notification under Section 3A of the National Highways Act, 1956 till the date of award or possession, and the application of multiplier Factor-2 does not bar this benefit Respondents argued that since multiplier Factor-2 was already applied, no further additional compensation is payable

Ratio Decidendi

The additional compensation under Section 30(3) of the 2013 Act is a solatium payable on the market value determined under Section 26, and the period commences from the date of preliminary notification under the National Highways Act, 1956. The application of multiplier Factor-2 under Section 26 does not preclude the grant of additional compensation under Section 30(3), as the two benefits are distinct and cumulative.

Judgment Excerpts

In the present set of writ petitions, the petitioners are seeking for the benefits of statutory benefits of additional compensation @ 12% on the market value of the land provided under Section 30(3) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (in short as ‘the 2013 Act’) for the period commending from the date of the preliminary notification published under Section 3A of the National Highways Act, 1956, till the date of the award or the date of taking possession of the land, whichever is earlier, as per the scheme of the said provision. The petitioners would submit that though while making determination of the market value in accordance with Section 26 of the 2013 Act, multiplication Factor-2 was applied with respect to the land-in-question under the award, however, the benefits of the additional compensation as payable under Section 30(3) of the Act, 2013 on the total amount of the market value of the land has not been granted.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions before the High Court of Gujarat seeking additional compensation under Section 30(3) of the 2013 Act. The court heard the parties and delivered judgment on 24/03/2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013: Section 26, Section 30(3)
  • National Highways Act, 1956: Section 3A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Additional Compensation Under Section 30(3) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 for Land Acquired Under National Highways Act, 1956 — Multiplier Factor-2 Already Applied, Yet Solatium Payable on Market Value from Preliminary Notificatio...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in U.P. Excise Act Interest Dispute, Holding Licensee Liable for Interest Despite Interim Stay. Interest on Arrears of Excise Revenue is Payable Under Section 38A of U.P. Excise Act, 1910, as Interim Stay Only Suspen...