Gujarat High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — License Not Proven Fake. Insurance Company Failed to Produce Cogent Evidence to Establish Driving License Was Fake, Hence Not Exonerated from Liability.

High Court: Gujarat High Court
  • 11
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal filed by the National Insurance Company Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 03.04.2015 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxiliary), Gandhidham at Kachchh in MACP No.272/2009. The Tribunal had partly allowed the claim petition and awarded Rs.5,30,123/- with interest at 9% per annum. The insurance company challenged the award on the ground that the driver of the offending vehicle did not hold a valid driving license at the time of the accident, and the license produced at Exh.74 was fake as per the company's investigator. The insurance company sought exoneration from satisfying the award. The High Court, after hearing the appellant's counsel, examined the record. It noted that the insurance company had not examined any officer from the RTO to prove that the license was fake. In the absence of cogent evidence, the Tribunal did not err in holding that the insurance company failed to prove the license was fake. The Court also referred to the Supreme Court judgment in Hind Samachar Ltd. v. National Insurance Company Ltd., 2025 INSC 1204, which emphasizes the need for due diligence and evidence. Consequently, the High Court found no merit in the appeal and dismissed it, upholding the Tribunal's award.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Driving License - Fake License - Burden of Proof - Insurance Company - The insurance company alleged that the driver's license was fake but failed to examine any RTO officer or produce cogent evidence. The Tribunal held that the company could not prove the license was fake. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, relying on Hind Samachar Ltd. v. National Insurance Company Ltd., 2025 INSC 1204, which requires the insurer to prove due diligence and produce evidence. (Paras 3-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the insurance company can be exonerated from satisfying the award on the ground that the driver's driving license was fake, when the company failed to produce cogent evidence to prove the license was fake.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The impugned judgment and award dated 03.04.2015 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxiliary), Gandhidham at Kachchh in MACP No.272/2009 is confirmed.

Law Points

  • Burden of proof on insurance company to prove driving license fake
  • Requirement of cogent evidence to establish fake license
  • Insurance company cannot be exonerated without proper evidence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:17012

R/First Appeal No. 2457 of 2015

2026-02-24

Mool Chand Tyagi

2026:GUJHC:17012

Ms. Masumi Nanavaty (for Mr. Vibhuti Nanavati) for Appellant, Mr. Savan N Pandya for Defendant No.2, Mr. Vishal C Mehta, Mr. Kishan H Daiya, Mr. Kishan Prajapati for Defendant No.3

National Insurance Company Ltd. Gandhidham, Kachchh

Adhelal Shivpujan Manji (Deleted) & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against judgment and award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in a claim petition for compensation.

Remedy Sought

Insurance company sought modification of the award to exonerate it from satisfying the compensation on the ground that the driver's license was fake.

Filing Reason

Insurance company alleged that the driver of the offending vehicle did not hold a valid driving license and the license was fake.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxiliary), Gandhidham at Kachchh partly allowed MACP No.272/2009 and awarded Rs.5,30,123/- with 9% interest per annum.

Issues

Whether the insurance company can be exonerated from liability when it fails to produce cogent evidence to prove that the driving license was fake.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant/Insurance Company: The driver's license was fake as per the investigator's report; the license copy at Exh.74 was fake; the Tribunal erred in not exonerating the insurance company. Respondents: Not argued as only appellant was heard.

Ratio Decidendi

The insurance company failed to produce cogent evidence, such as examining an RTO officer, to prove that the driving license was fake. Therefore, the Tribunal correctly held that the insurance company could not be exonerated from satisfying the award.

Judgment Excerpts

The insurance company has not examined any officer from the RTO to prove that the license produced at Exh.74 is fake. In absence of any cogent evidence, the learned Tribunal has not committed any error in holding that the insurance company could not prove on record that the license was fake.

Procedural History

The claim petition (MACP No.272/2009) was filed before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxiliary), Gandhidham at Kachchh, which partly allowed it on 03.04.2015. The insurance company filed the present first appeal (R/FA/2457/2015) in the High Court of Gujarat, which was heard and dismissed on 24.02.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — License Not Proven Fake. Insurance Company Failed to Produce Cogent Evidence to Establish Driving License Was Fake, Hence Not Exonerated from Liability.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Upholds General Court Martial Conviction Under POCSO Act. Judicial Review of Court Martial Proceedings – Sexual Offences Against Minors – Scope of High Court’s Jurisdiction Under Article 226