Gujarat High Court Allows Wife's Appeal for Possession of Matrimonial Home in Domestic Violence Case. Right to Residence Under Section 17 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Upheld.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Rina Diwan, wife of Kiritkumar Diwan, filed a First Appeal before the Gujarat High Court challenging the judgment dated 26.11.2025 passed by the Family Court, Ahmedabad in Family Suit No. 2069 of 2021. The Family Court had dismissed her suit seeking a declaration and permanent injunction in respect of the suit premises, a tenement located at Chunwal Nagar (Part-2), First Floor, Bhargav Road, Meghaninagar, Ahmedabad. The marriage between the parties took place on 16th February 2010, and a son was born on 22nd October 2012. The parties lived together in the suit premises until May 2020, when the respondent-husband left the home for reasons not specified, followed by respondent nos. 2 and 3 (in-laws). The appellant continued to reside in the suit premises. She filed the suit seeking a direction to the respondents to hand over peaceful possession of the suit premises. The Family Court dismissed the suit. On appeal, the High Court, after hearing the submissions of Mr. Bhunesh Rupera for the appellant and Mr. Tapaswi Raval for the respondents, passed an order on 02.02.2026 accepting the submissions and allowing the appeal. The Court held that the wife has a right to reside in the matrimonial home and the Family Court's order was erroneous. The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was granted possession of the suit premises.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Matrimonial Home - Right to Residence - Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 17 - Wife sought possession of suit premises as shared household - Husband and in-laws left the house, wife continued in possession - Family Court dismissed suit - Held that wife has a right to reside in the matrimonial home and the Family Court's order was erroneous - Appeal allowed, possession granted to wife (Paras 1-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the wife is entitled to possession of the suit premises as her matrimonial home and whether the Family Court erred in dismissing her suit for declaration and permanent injunction.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The judgment dated 26.11.2025 passed by the Family Court, Ahmedabad in Family Suit No. 2069 of 2021 is set aside. The appellant is entitled to possession of the suit premises.

Law Points

  • Matrimonial home
  • right to residence
  • domestic violence
  • shared household
  • possession
  • injunction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (02) 324

R/First Appeal No. 232 of 2026

2026-02-06

Sangeeta K. Vishen, Nisha M. Thakore

Bhunesh C Rupera, Tapaswi P Raval

Rina W/o Kiritkumar Diwan and D/o Rameshbhai

Kiritkumar Revandas Diwan & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First Appeal against dismissal of suit for declaration and permanent injunction regarding possession of matrimonial home.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought direction to respondents to hand over peaceful possession of the suit premises.

Filing Reason

Appellant's husband and in-laws left the matrimonial home, and the Family Court dismissed her suit for possession.

Previous Decisions

Family Court, Ahmedabad dismissed Family Suit No. 2069 of 2021 on 26.11.2025.

Issues

Whether the appellant is entitled to possession of the suit premises as her matrimonial home? Whether the Family Court erred in dismissing the suit for declaration and permanent injunction?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant's counsel submitted that marriage took place on 16.02.2010, son born on 22.10.2012, and respondent left home in May 2020, followed by in-laws. Respondent's counsel made submissions, but details not specified in the judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

The wife has a right to reside in the matrimonial home under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and the Family Court's dismissal of her suit was erroneous.

Judgment Excerpts

The captioned appeal is filed challenging the judgment dated 26.11.2025 passed by the Family Court, Ahmedabad in Family Suit no. 2069 of 2021 whereby the suit filed by the appellant seeking declaration and permanent injunction is dismissed. Accepting the submissions, this Court on 02.02.2026 has passed the following order...

Procedural History

Family Suit No. 2069 of 2021 filed by appellant before Family Court, Ahmedabad, dismissed on 26.11.2025. Appellant filed First Appeal No. 232 of 2026 before Gujarat High Court. High Court passed order on 02.02.2026 and final judgment on 06.02.2026 allowing the appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005: 17
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Wife's Appeal for Possession of Matrimonial Home in Domestic Violence Case. Right to Residence Under Section 17 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Upheld.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad in Land Acquisition Compensation Case. Market Value Fixed at Rs.99 per sq. yard Upheld as Just and Reasonable Based on Comparable Sale Deeds and Location of Land.